76/95 VA counties declare 2A sanctuaries

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if your current guns are grandfathered then why so worried?

I wouldn't have a problem with that, I know many others who would. But after some of the extreme legislation I've seen from a couple other states, i'll believe that when it happens. I already went through a background check for each firearm purchased, the paperwork is still on file and will be forever. Virginia has a state form which VSP can obtain at any time and ATF can obtain the 4473.

Why should I "register" these again? And with who? The State or a local government? Who has access to this information and what do they do with it? If there is a criminal complaint against me related to firearms or any serious crime at the Federal, State or local level my information can already be accessed. What happens when a spouse or parent dies? Can they pass along firearms or will it be property of the State at that point?

If your spouse dies, you might become depressed. We should seize your guns preemptively.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't we all come to an agreement and give these gun nut anarchists Florida or something? Give them the penis state and maybe they'll feel less inadequate.

But if you flipped the coin, can't we just send you to California or New Jersey. I mean Ive lived my entire life in Virginia, how long have you been here?

I've lived in VA my entire life as well - probably more years than you. I support your unlimited right to muskets. Go for it! Other than that, you and your fellow gun nuts need to enjoy yourselves silly to death in your own dystopian culture together, and leave the rest of us well alone.

For those of you who think that the 2nd Amendment applies only to "muskets", what about the 1st amendment? Do you think that "freedom of the press" applies only to hand-operated wooden presses? What about radio, TV, and the internet? They're not mentioned in the first amendment, so maybe we can regulate those outlets the way that MDA and other groups want to regulate modern guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't we all come to an agreement and give these gun nut anarchists Florida or something? Give them the penis state and maybe they'll feel less inadequate.

But if you flipped the coin, can't we just send you to California or New Jersey. I mean Ive lived my entire life in Virginia, how long have you been here?

I've lived in VA my entire life as well - probably more years than you. I support your unlimited right to muskets. Go for it! Other than that, you and your fellow gun nuts need to enjoy yourselves silly to death in your own dystopian culture together, and leave the rest of us well alone.

For those of you who think that the 2nd Amendment applies only to "muskets", what about the 1st amendment? Do you think that "freedom of the press" applies only to hand-operated wooden presses? What about radio, TV, and the internet? They're not mentioned in the first amendment, so maybe we can regulate those outlets the way that MDA and other groups want to regulate modern guns.

So I should have access to any "arms' i want by your reasoning.

Shoulder launched missles, nukes, it all.

Ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't we all come to an agreement and give these gun nut anarchists Florida or something? Give them the penis state and maybe they'll feel less inadequate.

But if you flipped the coin, can't we just send you to California or New Jersey. I mean Ive lived my entire life in Virginia, how long have you been here?

I've lived in VA my entire life as well - probably more years than you. I support your unlimited right to muskets. Go for it! Other than that, you and your fellow gun nuts need to enjoy yourselves silly to death in your own dystopian culture together, and leave the rest of us well alone.

For those of you who think that the 2nd Amendment applies only to "muskets", what about the 1st amendment? Do you think that "freedom of the press" applies only to hand-operated wooden presses? What about radio, TV, and the internet? They're not mentioned in the first amendment, so maybe we can regulate those outlets the way that MDA and other groups want to regulate modern guns.

So I should have access to any "arms' i want by your reasoning.

Shoulder launched missles, nukes, it all.

Ok.

These are not unlimited rights. The freedom of the press doesn't mean a single media company can form a monopoly. Gun owners can't own certain weapons in a similar way. But to claim that the 2A only applies to the technology present at the time is ludicrous. These are the same silly arguments made regarding "secure in their papers" and modern computing devices i.e. phones aren't paper, so search and seizure rules don't apply.

[Anonymous]

I’ll preface this by saying I don’t live in VA, but rather in MD, and I’m worried about this sanctuary movement gaining more traction here, outside of the racist parts of the state where it is now.

Northam needs to make his stand on this next year. Because if he doesn’t, it threatens to basically negate the power of state governance as a operating model. You can’t have a bunch of elected county yahoos deciding what laws get enforced in their inbred little fiefdoms.

If that means Northan has to call up the National Guard to enforce gun laws, so be it. And any cop who doesn’t enforce the new laws needs to be fired. And the state needs to cut off all funding for any county that declares itself a gun sanctuary. Lastly, I really do think some examples are going to have to be made, quickly, and dramatically, when the new laws come into effect, especially for banning assault weapons. There needs to be in overwhelming show of force directed at gun nutters who aren’t complying, and they need to face the full fury of police and National Guard. Once the rest of them see that clinging to their guns might literally get them pulled from their cold dead hands like their bumper sticker says, those cowards will fall in line pretty quick. But examples will have to be made at first. I hope Northam is up to the task. He weathered the storm about the yearbook pretty well, so that’s encouraging, since he’s got the character for a fight. But I worry that he’ll relent on this the first time some trailer trash or rednecks with assault weapons get massacred by a police SWAT team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't we all come to an agreement and give these gun nut anarchists Florida or something? Give them the penis state and maybe they'll feel less inadequate.

But if you flipped the coin, can't we just send you to California or New Jersey. I mean Ive lived my entire life in Virginia, how long have you been here?

I've lived in VA my entire life as well - probably more years than you. I support your unlimited right to muskets. Go for it! Other than that, you and your fellow gun nuts need to enjoy yourselves silly to death in your own dystopian culture together, and leave the rest of us well alone.

For those of you who think that the 2nd Amendment applies only to "muskets", what about the 1st amendment? Do you think that "freedom of the press" applies only to hand-operated wooden presses? What about radio, TV, and the internet? They're not mentioned in the first amendment, so maybe we can regulate those outlets the way that MDA and other groups want to regulate modern guns.

So I should have access to any "arms' i want by your reasoning.

Shoulder launched missles, nukes, it all.

Ok.

These are not unlimited rights. The freedom of the press doesn't mean a single media company can form a monopoly. Gun owners can't own certain weapons in a similar way. But to claim that the 2A only applies to the technology present at the time is ludicrous. These are the same silly arguments made regarding "secure in their papers" and modern computing devices i.e. phones aren't paper, so search and seizure rules don't apply.

Anything you say, gun humper Where’d you go to law school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if your current guns are grandfathered then why so worried?

I wouldn't have a problem with that, I know many others who would. But after some of the extreme legislation I've seen from a couple other states, i'll believe that when it happens. I already went through a background check for each firearm purchased, the paperwork is still on file and will be forever. Virginia has a state form which VSP can obtain at any time and ATF can obtain the 4473.

Why should I "register" these again? And with who? The State or a local government? Who has access to this information and what do they do with it? If there is a criminal complaint against me related to firearms or any serious crime at the Federal, State or local level my information can already be accessed. What happens when a spouse or parent dies? Can they pass along firearms or will it be property of the State at that point?

If your spouse dies, you might become depressed. We should seize your guns preemptively.

That alone would save literally dozens of lives every year, JUST in Virginia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Eh, nobody wants to take all the guns away from the little whiners and bullies.

Um, yes, I do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If you are curious about a specific one(s) or all of them, I will be more than happy to explain further what each means.

Which ones do you have? All of them?

And do you have any high-capacity magazines?

Yes to: Folding/telescoping stock, Pistol grip, Secondary grip, Compensator/ Flash hider/ Muzzle brake, and threaded barrel. I don't see what is wrong with any of these features and they are commonplace among most modern rifles.

I don't have a firearm with a bayonet lug, they really aren't my thing, but the majority of pre 1960 services rifles have them as a standard feature. I don't really see how the ability to mount a bayonet turns your great granddads bolt action Mauser/Springfield into an assault weapon.


LMAO no Grenade launchers, Im not sure where they are getting this from, I want to say I had a flare gun in an old Vietnam era emergency kit that was given by a neighbor. But I haven't seen that in years.

I have a few NFA items like suppressors. In addition to the standard NICS background check you go through when you buy a gun there was a 9-14 month wait, a $200 check to ATF, the submission of fingerprints and passport style photographs to law enforcement. You are also required to notify the CLEO of your City/County of your intended purchase. All of this occurs every time you wish to purchase a NFA item.

I have standard capacity magazines, no 100 round drums or anything. Just the magazine that were intended to be utilized for the specific firearms.

Do you masturbate to the fantasy of storming into a kindergarten class with your ar15 and literally blowing children’s bodies apart? Blowing off little arms and legs with high action ammunition? Hearing their screams as they die? Does that make you feel like a big powerful man? Does that get you off?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if your current guns are grandfathered then why so worried?

I wouldn't have a problem with that, I know many others who would. But after some of the extreme legislation I've seen from a couple other states, i'll believe that when it happens. I already went through a background check for each firearm purchased, the paperwork is still on file and will be forever. Virginia has a state form which VSP can obtain at any time and ATF can obtain the 4473.

Why should I "register" these again? And with who? The State or a local government? Who has access to this information and what do they do with it? If there is a criminal complaint against me related to firearms or any serious crime at the Federal, State or local level my information can already be accessed. What happens when a spouse or parent dies? Can they pass along firearms or will it be property of the State at that point?

If your spouse dies, you might become depressed. We should seize your guns preemptively.

And you wonder why we cant make any progress. Just stay at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't we all come to an agreement and give these gun nut anarchists Florida or something? Give them the penis state and maybe they'll feel less inadequate.

But if you flipped the coin, can't we just send you to California or New Jersey. I mean Ive lived my entire life in Virginia, how long have you been here?

I've lived in VA my entire life as well - probably more years than you. I support your unlimited right to muskets. Go for it! Other than that, you and your fellow gun nuts need to enjoy yourselves silly to death in your own dystopian culture together, and leave the rest of us well alone.

For those of you who think that the 2nd Amendment applies only to "muskets", what about the 1st amendment? Do you think that "freedom of the press" applies only to hand-operated wooden presses? What about radio, TV, and the internet? They're not mentioned in the first amendment, so maybe we can regulate those outlets the way that MDA and other groups want to regulate modern guns.

So I should have access to any "arms' i want by your reasoning.

Shoulder launched missles, nukes, it all.

Ok.

Lol, how old are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh, nobody wants to take all the guns away from the little whiners and bullies.

Um, yes, I do.

DING DING DING

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If you are curious about a specific one(s) or all of them, I will be more than happy to explain further what each means.

Which ones do you have? All of them?

And do you have any high-capacity magazines?

Yes to: Folding/telescoping stock, Pistol grip, Secondary grip, Compensator/ Flash hider/ Muzzle brake, and threaded barrel. I don't see what is wrong with any of these features and they are commonplace among most modern rifles.

I don't have a firearm with a bayonet lug, they really aren't my thing, but the majority of pre 1960 services rifles have them as a standard feature. I don't really see how the ability to mount a bayonet turns your great granddads bolt action Mauser/Springfield into an assault weapon.


LMAO no Grenade launchers, Im not sure where they are getting this from, I want to say I had a flare gun in an old Vietnam era emergency kit that was given by a neighbor. But I haven't seen that in years.

I have a few NFA items like suppressors. In addition to the standard NICS background check you go through when you buy a gun there was a 9-14 month wait, a $200 check to ATF, the submission of fingerprints and passport style photographs to law enforcement. You are also required to notify the CLEO of your City/County of your intended purchase. All of this occurs every time you wish to purchase a NFA item.

I have standard capacity magazines, no 100 round drums or anything. Just the magazine that were intended to be utilized for the specific firearms.

Do you masturbate to the fantasy of storming into a kindergarten class with your ar15 and literally blowing children’s bodies apart? Blowing off little arms and legs with high action ammunition? Hearing their screams as they die? Does that make you feel like a big powerful man? Does that get you off?

Why don't you respond with something constructive? Seriously, WTF is wrong with you. I hope you don't have any kids, but if you do, they should be removed from your crazy ass and placed in a better home ASAP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ll preface this by saying I don’t live in VA, but rather in MD, and I’m worried about this sanctuary movement gaining more traction here, outside of the racist parts of the state where it is now.

Northam needs to make his stand on this next year. Because if he doesn’t, it threatens to basically negate the power of state governance as a operating model. You can’t have a bunch of elected county yahoos deciding what laws get enforced in their inbred little fiefdoms.

If that means Northan has to call up the National Guard to enforce gun laws, so be it. And any cop who doesn’t enforce the new laws needs to be fired. And the state needs to cut off all funding for any county that declares itself a gun sanctuary. Lastly, I really do think some examples are going to have to be made, quickly, and dramatically, when the new laws come into effect, especially for banning assault weapons. There needs to be in overwhelming show of force directed at gun nutters who aren’t complying, and they need to face the full fury of police and National Guard. Once the rest of them see that clinging to their guns might literally get them pulled from their cold dead hands like their bumper sticker says, those cowards will fall in line pretty quick. But examples will have to be made at first. I hope Northam is up to the task. He weathered the storm about the yearbook pretty well, so that’s encouraging, since he’s got the character for a fight. But I worry that he’ll relent on this the first time some trailer trash or rednecks with assault weapons get massacred by a police SWAT team.

Cool same should be done to Sanctuary cities too. National Guard should sweep through them going door to door to make sure everyone is a citizen.

You are a lunatic, please stay in Maryland. Unlike you we do not want a civil war or any kind of war for that matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ll preface this by saying I don’t live in VA, but rather in MD, and I’m worried about this sanctuary movement gaining more traction here, outside of the racist parts of the state where it is now.

Northam needs to make his stand on this next year. Because if he doesn’t, it threatens to basically negate the power of state governance as a operating model. You can’t have a bunch of elected county yahoos deciding what laws get enforced in their inbred little fiefdoms.

If that means Northan has to call up the National Guard to enforce gun laws, so be it. And any cop who doesn’t enforce the new laws needs to be fired. And the state needs to cut off all funding for any county that declares itself a gun sanctuary. Lastly, I really do think some examples are going to have to be made, quickly, and dramatically, when the new laws come into effect, especially for banning assault weapons. There needs to be in overwhelming show of force directed at gun nutters who aren’t complying, and they need to face the full fury of police and National Guard. Once the rest of them see that clinging to their guns might literally get them pulled from their cold dead hands like their bumper sticker says, those cowards will fall in line pretty quick. But examples will have to be made at first. I hope Northam is up to the task. He weathered the storm about the yearbook pretty well, so that’s encouraging, since he’s got the character for a fight. But I worry that he’ll relent on this the first time some trailer trash or rednecks with assault weapons get massacred by a police SWAT team.

Examples have to be made? You truly are sick. I hope you are just a lonely troll and not someone who has any duty or responsibility in our society. Make your self and your beliefs known, it will only empower your opposition.