Me too! |
I was just thinking exactly the same thing about you. Imagine that! -DP |
Hi, I lived in Japan for three years recently. Working in Japan sucks. Even for entry level jobs there is loads of competition and a required commitment to the company. Automation and high skilled workforce is required there. The only places that need factories are low skilled factories in the countryside. Those workers, typically From the Philippines only have 3year visas. After three years Japanese companies are required to increase benefits, so almost all entry level labor has contracts that expire after three years. The nice thing about Japanes firms is that they train you, often provide housing perks, job commitment. A lot of this is about Japanese culture, but a lot is about managing employees at all times. Anyways, it is not very comparable to what we do here in the U.S in terms of labor. Yes Japan needs healthcare aides for the elderly, but multigenerational housing is quite common. Especially in the countryside. |
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/trump-clinton-immigration-economy-unemployment-jobs-214216 Sure I go to those places. Where I live deep in the Nova burbs most of those workers are American. Same for my hometown in PA. It is not the case that ONLY immigrants - amdbillehal ones at that - can fill those jobs. |
Well said! |
No, we have not adequately supported legal immigration - NOBODY on either side thinks that. Stop clutching your pearls, and read ALL the research I have posted. We need immigrants. The answer is not to foam at the mouth about "illegals" but rather to regularize immigration. |
Well said. The US continues to accept about 1 million legal immigrants every year, and these numbers have continued under Trump. There is no such large scale legal immigration to Japan.
I do think we could increase legal immigration , say, to 1.5 million people a year, but no-one seems to want to discuss this. |
OP here. The Democrats want to discuss this. Despite the libel that they want open borders, what their platform ACTUALLY calls for is regularlizing immigration in a way that serves the needs of the economy. Whether that is 500,000 a year or more or less, I don't know. |
+ a million |
Speaking of pearl-clutching... you're the one foaming at the mouth about "regularizing (ILLEGAL) immigration." The rest of us are pointing out that the US has done a fine job of bringing legal immigrants into this country, and is continuing to do so. Not sure where you've been if you actually think people on "both sides" agree with you. You're wrong. Of course we "need" immigrants - legal, well-educated ones. |
Who were you responding to? |
Do you have any research showing what would happen to the economy if we deported all illegal immigrants and froze legal immigration at current levels? It would not be pretty. All sides know business depends on illegal labor currently. Here are our libertarian friends again: https://reason.com/2018/07/21/the-us-needs-more-immigrants/ the more you rant without engaging with the actual research, the more you demonstrate that you are motivated by animus. or you're just stupid. or both |
"What serves the needs of the economy" means different things to different people. There is no need to set up false dilemmas like "let in everyone who wants to" or "be cared for by robots in your old age." Besides, when you argue for increased inflow of low-skilled migrants, you are basically institutionalizing a perpetual underclass. Businesses love hiring people who work cheaply, have no rights and receive no benefits. I don't know if this is the sort of dependency you want to encourage. |
Research, schmesearch. Surely you know that all studies are commissionable. Few things are easier to manipulate. |
Hey, if you want to talk about the well-being of low-wage workers, I know of a couple of great candiates focusing on that (Warren and Sanders). What creates a perpetual underclass is when the business establishment of a nation knowingly relies on illegal labor, while Republicans further drive immigrants into the shadow and make them even more vulnerable to exploitation. A cynical person could say that is by design ... |