Cohen Testifying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I certainly hope the Senators will listen closely to this highly credible witness.

You've got to be kidding.

He doesn't need to be credible if there is documentation.

You mean the documentation that he just "stumbled across?" LOL.

Are you implying that he stole a check from Trump’s company and backdated and forged his signature and did the same thing with Jr’s signature?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

When is Cohen serving his jail time for the lies he told the last time he spoke?

Starting in May.

And you all know if he lies again he’ll get more prison time, right?

Would a liar possibly lie to avoid more prison time? hmmm

Yes, Trump would do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I certainly hope the Senators will listen closely to this highly credible witness.

You've got to be kidding.

Credible because Trump himself called him a rat. You can't rat out a person who didn't do anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I certainly hope the Senators will listen closely to this highly credible witness.

You've got to be kidding.

He doesn't need to be credible if there is documentation.

You mean the documentation that he just "stumbled across?" LOL.

Cancelled checks and signed documents that have verifiable date stamping are credible.

And for as much of a liar Cohen is, he doesn't hold a candle to Trump in that department.

[Anonymous]

The written testimony lays out exactly what Sarah Kendzior predicted. Scary times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I certainly hope the Senators will listen closely to this highly credible witness.

You've got to be kidding.

He doesn't need to be credible if there is documentation.

You mean the documentation that he just "stumbled across?" LOL.

Cancelled checks and signed documents that have verifiable date stamping are credible.

And for as much of a liar Cohen is, he doesn't hold a candle to Trump in that department.

And, you think Cohen just "stumbled across" this evidence? LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The written testimony lays out exactly what Sarah Kendzior predicted. Scary times.

Please elaborate. I don’t understand this reference

[Anonymous]

What’s incriminating?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I certainly hope the Senators will listen closely to this highly credible witness.

You've got to be kidding.

He doesn't need to be credible if there is documentation.

You mean the documentation that he just "stumbled across?" LOL.

Cancelled checks and signed documents that have verifiable date stamping are credible.

And for as much of a liar Cohen is, he doesn't hold a candle to Trump in that department.

And, you think Cohen just "stumbled across" this evidence? LOL.

You don't think the financial records are verifiable? The tweets from Trump line up with Cohen's testimony, particularly about the portrait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The written testimony lays out exactly what Sarah Kendzior predicted. Scary times.

Please elaborate. I don’t understand this reference

https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1100624079982379008

[Anonymous]

Interesting that the tetimony lays out Don Jr., but there's no mention of Ivanka or Jared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I certainly hope the Senators will listen closely to this highly credible witness.

You've got to be kidding.

He doesn't need to be credible if there is documentation.

You mean the documentation that he just "stumbled across?" LOL.

Cancelled checks and signed documents that have verifiable date stamping are credible.

And for as much of a liar Cohen is, he doesn't hold a candle to Trump in that department.

And, you think Cohen just "stumbled across" this evidence? LOL.

What difference does it make? Evidence is evidence. You can't deny it, so you divert to some minor side issue and use a lame argument from incredulity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

When is Cohen serving his jail time for the lies he told the last time he spoke?

Starting in May.

And you all know if he lies again he’ll get more prison time, right?

Would a liar possibly lie to avoid more prison time? hmmm

Yes, Trump would do that.

PP here. Very possibly. And same for Cohen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The written testimony lays out exactly what Sarah Kendzior predicted. Scary times.

Please elaborate. I don’t understand this reference

https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1100624079982379008

So Trump and Cohen planned this out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s incriminating?

Trump knew that Stone was coordinated document releases with Wikileaks. This is the crime of Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, colloquially called "collusion."

Oh and Trum knowingly paid Cohen for fake.work to hide the illegal payment to Stormy.