A study suggesting another drug is as effective as or better than stimulants is not a career risk. Heck that drug may even be made by the same drug company as stimulants. Finding stimulants pose harm is more of a career risk. |
You are wrong. I am a research scientist and have read the primary literature on this. Stimulants are far safer than other drugs currently used to treat ADHD. This is calculated in terms of frequency and gravity of side-effects of each type of medication. Simple and undeniable. |
My 10 yo and I both take intuniv. It’s been a great complement to stimulants, reducing the “crash” when the stimulant wears off and making the stimulant more effective while it’s in our system (so we can take lower doses than we did before adding intuniv). But on its own, it hasn’t been enough to manage symptoms. |
But you're not a doctor. |
DP. A research scientist is better trained than a doctor to understand the results, implications and limitations of research studies. |
You're refuting doctors' experience, which is as valuable or more than a study, which by its nature is limited. |
No, a doctor’s recollection of a handful of anecdotes mixed in with some general speculation is not more reliable data than peer-reviewed medical research. |
You are not a doctor either. If you have research to back up his claims, then show it. Otherwise it's just one doctor against most of the research and the majority of other doctors. |
Pp, my child is on a non-stimulant so I am not opposed to your position... but it sounds like you are taking one doctor’s opinion over that of the bulk of the research plus the opinions of most doctors. Have you looked into this other than asking your doctor? Stimulants are considered the first line of defense and the gold standard . Most doctors go to stimulants first because doctors read and care about the research done by the scientists. You should know that your doctor is the one going against the grain. |
+ a million As someone who has ADHD and is now grown and was put on stimulants as a child, I wish I was never ever given them. I have friends who take it because they have ADHD and function just fine as an adult but enjoy the pep in their step, and I warn them that pep is gonna go away one day and then they won’t be able to live with them, and won’t be able to live without them. |
This. OP, please check back in with us in a couple days and tell us how it is going. My child was like this the first couple days off the medication and then returned to his old self after close to a week. We cannot do single days or weekends off medication because of this. I think it depends on the medication and child, but there can definitely be a withdrawal when you are going off the medication. |
In their field, yes. But "research scientist" covers a lot of ground and most research scientists don't have the background in medicine, human anatomy, human biochemistry, human microbiology or pharmacology to judge medical interventions. |
+1. Effective ADHD medications are a huge market, but the old stimulant formulas coming off patent have forced drug companies to innovate on those medications to get new patents. If a researcher found something new that was even more effective, big pharma would be falling all over each other to get it first. |
Thanks for this! I am not a research scientist, so it's helpful to have someone interpret the studies. My doctor says the same thing. She thinks I need to stop worrying about the meds (my DD takes Concerta and Zoloft). She also said that my child, because she is medicated, has a lower chance of self medicating, which the doctor normally starts to see around my child's age (14). |
| Off every weekend, never seen withdrawal/rebound |