Hat tip to Trump for his unassailable SCOTUS pick

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder: Justice Kennedy’s son made a billion dollars in loans to Trump from the Russia infested and sanctioned Deutche Bank.

Kennedy negotiated the appointment of Kavanaugh.

There is ZERO proof of your last statement other than an unsourced report from a partisan media organization.

I trust the organization, you don't. If it is proven true, would you still attack the messenger or will you evaluate the message?

Leigh Ann Caldwell’s last tweet:

“To be clear: This is from one source and don’t have any info on whether potus talked to Kennedy about a possible replacement.”

She is walking back her claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh will sail through. Sure we'll here lots of this and that, but it's a done deal. Collins, Murkowski, Manchin, etc will all confirm. Plus, he's actually a great pick. I dare anyone to come up with a plausible argument on why he should not be confirmed.

Judging by the level of corruption in his cabinet choices then it stands to reason everyone he chooses is equally as corrupt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Before it turns hatefully negative, I agree with you. He was the safe pick with the least visible negatives for the democrats to gain traction, Should get the red state dem votes. They cannot afford not to.

Then why does mcturtle disagree with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh will sail through. Sure we'll here lots of this and that, but it's a done deal. Collins, Murkowski, Manchin, etc will all confirm. Plus, he's actually a great pick. I dare anyone to come up with a plausible argument on why he should not be confirmed.

Based on professional credentials, he meets the minimum qualifications. But he will have one of the largest paper trails, and his commemts about the president and criminal investigations will resonate negatively with the public in a way that more abstract legal arguments will not. He will have one of the more difficult confirmation processes of the possible nominees.

Kavanaugh was Douchebag Extraordinaire during the Starr investigation. I hear he's grown up since then but there's gotta be dirt from back in the day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooops......

Seems as if the “women’s march” folks pre-wrote their response slamming the SCOTUS pick, but forgot to go back and enter the name of the nominee,
Pretty much exposes them for who they are........



Full response is printed in this article: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/9/womens-march-mocked-press-release-opposing-supreme/

Yep. And college kids were interviewed on campus two days ago, asking how they liked the SCOTUS nominee (acting as though the selection was already made). They all complained he was a racist, and horrible, and would take away their rights, etc., etc.

That’s because they’re so stupid and removed from reality that they had no idea that the announcement had not been made

I would sa they live in alternate leftist reality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooops......

Seems as if the “women’s march” folks pre-wrote their response slamming the SCOTUS pick, but forgot to go back and enter the name of the nominee,
Pretty much exposes them for who they are........



Full response is printed in this article: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/9/womens-march-mocked-press-release-opposing-supreme/

Yep. And college kids were interviewed on campus two days ago, asking how they liked the SCOTUS nominee (acting as though the selection was already made). They all complained he was a racist, and horrible, and would take away their rights, etc., etc.

That’s because they’re so stupid and removed from reality that they had no idea that the announcement had not been made

I would sa they live in alternate leftist reality

There were only four potential choices. They already knew they didn't like any of them. You're really overreaching on this one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Before it turns hatefully negative, I agree with you. He was the safe pick with the least visible negatives for the democrats to gain traction, Should get the red state dem votes. They cannot afford not to.

Well that didn't take long.

He is highly qualified. In the old days he will be confirmed 95 - 0. Even John McCain likes him. Graduated Yale law school, 12 years on the DC circuit, hired by liberal Kagan to teach at Harvard Law ... What more do you want?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before it turns hatefully negative, I agree with you. He was the safe pick with the least visible negatives for the democrats to gain traction, Should get the red state dem votes. They cannot afford not to.

Well that didn't take long.

He is highly qualified. In the old days he will be confirmed 95 - 0. Even John McCain likes him. Graduated Yale law school, 12 years on the DC circuit, hired by liberal Kagan to teach at Harvard Law ... What more do you want?

It took three years to get him on the DC Court of Appeals back in the Bush administration because of serious concerns about his judicial temperament so, no, and he didn’t even get 60 votes when he was eventually comfirmed. Those pesky facts, always denying conservatives the fairy tales they try to spread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooops......

Seems as if the “women’s march” folks pre-wrote their response slamming the SCOTUS pick, but forgot to go back and enter the name of the nominee,
Pretty much exposes them for who they are........



Full response is printed in this article: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/9/womens-march-mocked-press-release-opposing-supreme/

Yep. And college kids were interviewed on campus two days ago, asking how they liked the SCOTUS nominee (acting as though the selection was already made). They all complained he was a racist, and horrible, and would take away their rights, etc., etc.

That’s because they’re so stupid and removed from reality that they had no idea that the announcement had not been made

I would sa they live in alternate leftist reality

There were only four potential choices. They already knew they didn't like any of them. You're really overreaching on this one.

Surely with only 4 potential choices they could manage to write up reasons why each choice is a poor one? They aren't all carbon copies of each other.

Except in politics now, that's exactly where we are. They are choosing, all their choices are equally bad, we don't even have to think about why one choice might be different from another. That person A might be terrible because of a history on abortion, person B might have lauded Citizens United, and so on. Nope, all bad because they're on the wrong team, period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ooops......

Seems as if the “women’s march” folks pre-wrote their response slamming the SCOTUS pick, but forgot to go back and enter the name of the nominee,
Pretty much exposes them for who they are........



Full response is printed in this article: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/9/womens-march-mocked-press-release-opposing-supreme/

Oh please. We all knew who was on the list. All the candidates passed the conservatives’ litmus test, all with extreme judicial views. This response goes equally well with any of them. Pretty standard stuff to prepare such statements in advance. And if you deny that Republicans don’t do the exact same sort of preparations when they’re dealing with a Democratic president’s nominee we all know you’re lying. Or just extremely ignorant of the way lobbying and politics work.

The Women's March was using "XX" as a gender neutral way of describing the Supreme Court nominee, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before it turns hatefully negative, I agree with you. He was the safe pick with the least visible negatives for the democrats to gain traction, Should get the red state dem votes. They cannot afford not to.

Well that didn't take long.

He is highly qualified. In the old days he will be confirmed 95 - 0. Even John McCain likes him. Graduated Yale law school, 12 years on the DC circuit, hired by liberal Kagan to teach at Harvard Law ... What more do you want?

It took three years to get him on the DC Court of Appeals back in the Bush administration because of serious concerns about his judicial temperament so, no, and he didn’t even get 60 votes when he was eventually comfirmed. Those pesky facts, always denying conservatives the fairy tales they try to spread.

You know it had to do with his age and whether he was old enough to possess judicial temperament. I am Jeb educated and continue to share with Kavanaugh the Jesuit motto of "Men for others." I am a lefty but I respect Kavanaugh's values.

[Anonymous]

Crickets.

[Anonymous]

Another douchey gunhumper who thinks the Second Amendment trumps all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before it turns hatefully negative, I agree with you. He was the safe pick with the least visible negatives for the democrats to gain traction, Should get the red state dem votes. They cannot afford not to.

Well that didn't take long.

He is highly qualified. In the old days he will be confirmed 95 - 0. Even John McCain likes him. Graduated Yale law school, 12 years on the DC circuit, hired by liberal Kagan to teach at Harvard Law ... What more do you want?

It took three years to get him on the DC Court of Appeals back in the Bush administration because of serious concerns about his judicial temperament so, no, and he didn’t even get 60 votes when he was eventually comfirmed. Those pesky facts, always denying conservatives the fairy tales they try to spread.[/quot
You know it had to do with his age and whether he was old enough to possess judicial temperament. I am Jeb educated and continue to share with Kavanaugh the Jesuit motto of "Men for others." I am a lefty but I respect Kavanaugh's values.

You are lucky this is an anonymous site or you would be shouted out of your party for making such a statement.

[Anonymous]

He is a great choice - not one that liberals would go for but as they say Trump made it clear that he was going to select a conservative when it came to filling judicial appointments.

Trump won and as they say elections have consequences so I don't understand why liberals are hysterical.