|
NL has become much more competitive since the Mitchell's took over all operations and that was 2 summers ago. The 2020's and 2023's are really good and some of the younger teams are competitive but lack depth.
The plan for NL is to have PG/southern MD teams and to continue to have lower MoCo teams. They will practice and play independently. They will draw upon both camps to have the summer travel teams to compete at the larger showcases. |
| The NL program has definitely become more competitive. I think the 2024s are also very strong. |
That makes sense since the 2023 competing at the WSYL was age compliant. I imagine they had a few 24's playing to make up for the kids who didn't make the age cutoff. |
| The 2020 and 2023 teams are very good. 24 is nothing special. |
Then adding some top PGLC kids to the 2024 roster should be a good thing. |
| NL is expensive. Do they offer different rates for the PG teams? |
| Is NL any more expensive than the others? |
I don't think that it's more expensive, but it definitely hasn't been as strong as the others. Maybe the new partnership will change that, but it's too soon to say. |
What others are you referring to? I’ve always heard pretty good things about the program. |
| DCE and Madlax |
I think that depends on the years and I’d choose NL as an organization over Madlax any day. |
| NL is very expensive. It's the same cost as other clubs, but you have less practices and play in less tournaments. |
+1 |
At the younger levels, it's more expensive than BLC, probably because you don't have dads coaching, but the cost, amount of practices and tournaments are very comparable to Madlax. Don't know about the older ages. |
| DCE, Madlax and NL are way overpriced. But at least NL isn't run by scumbags like at DCE and Madlax. |