| Cogat is NOT an iq test. |
Both CogAT and SAT are learned reasoning tests with scores that correlate with how successful you're likely to be in school. Neither is an IQ test. Back in the day, no one prepped for the SAT, either. The only real difference now is that you're not supposed to prep for the CogAT, whereas it's assumed that you will prep for the SAT. I'm not surprised that there's such a strong parallel on these forums between the two tests. Both are easily prepped, the prepping will most likely increase your score somewhat, and small changes in scores can lead to huge changes in educational opportunities available to you. The excessive prepping for the CogAT has been a problem that has grossly bloated AAP, but it's not a problem that will be solved by wagging your finger at people and telling them not to prep. MoCo seems to have somewhat solved the problem. Perhaps FCPS should follow their lead. |
This is NOT accurate. Cogat does not provide an IQ score, but does correlate with IQ, While Cogat isn't an IQ score, it is an intelligence test accepted by admission for Mensa which has an IQ requirement of top 2%. |
| Think about it. Why teachers are instructed to ask kids if they prepped at home for COGAT? Are juniors in high school asked if they prepped for SAT? |
|
Here is my take on it relative to AAP. If the kid is able to prep and increase the score such that they are admitted to AAP, while not optimal, it is not a huge deal. As long as they can handle the work and pace, it is fine. The advantage of AAP is that the truly slow students are not impacting my kids education. (My DD is now out of AAP in HS; she is not at TJ)
|
|
Do an Amazon search for Cogar test prep.
Or on google. I couldn’t find many of Amazon, but for an excellent pack of test prep books from another website. Definitely worth the time and effort. |
| Just a warning from over here in Montgomery County: after years of parents gaming the system, the county got fed up and changed the criteria for admission to 4th grade gifted centers. They now mostly use the scores on the MAP tests they have been taking in school all along, plus a much shorter admission test. They are trying to find out what kids' real abilities are, beyond their parents. This is what will happen in your county too if you keep prepping. School systems don't like being used and manipulated this way. |
| Or just use a REAL iq test like the WISC! I prepped mine for cogat and all had 135+ WISC (not prepped). Most aap kids do not have 135+ iqs. |
|
Email your child's teacher and say you are interested in AAP if it is appropriate for your child. Ask the teacher for recommendations on how to prepare your child for the test. You could send the same email to the school's AART, or the equivalent in your county, who can also give you some good ideas.
Most of the schools also have meetings about the programs available and you can ask a lot of questions there. |
This. Bhwahahaha... invalid because teach thinks he/she prepared at home. What a crock...
|
This is not completely untrue. I know of a family whose child's psychologist made a note of the fact that he was familiar with types of questions in the report when he was taking WISC. Their appeal didn't work. Tried the following year again with a new test score and got it. The point is that you don't want to take any chance if you really want to make it the first year. |
You aren't gaming the system by working with your kids at home. If MCPS did a better job preparing our kids and teaching, I would not feel the need to work with them at home. We do a variety of workbooks - a few pages a day. Our child's favorite is the test prep book. The teacher in 3rd this year is teaching them test prep skills. So, is that teacher gaming the system or preparing them. I don't want my child at a gifted center. Transportation/distance will interfere with activities. |
Someone may have already said this. The problem is that the kid does not get only a numerical score, but also a percentile ranking. So let's say that your kid would score 135 on the NNAT, and be on 98th percentile without prepping (and probably be in the pool). Then 10 other kids, who would score 131 without prepping at 95th percentile, actually prep, scores 136, and are now on the 99th percentile. These kids, will not change your kids score, because 135 does not change, but the 98th percentile may become 96th or 97th percentile. And there, just because some of the other kids prep, your kid does not make the pool, and is not shining anymore. The percentiles are rankings of scores from the highest to the lowest, and then you see what percentage of kids falls below a certain score. Than that score is associated to that percentile. So, if 99% of the kids taking the test score below your kid, then your kid scored on the 99th percentile, and is screened for the program. If other kids prep, and their score becomes even equal to your kid's score, then that 99% becomes a lower one, lets say 95, 96, 97%, etc. The percentile is not what percent the kid got right, but it is the kid's score ranking with respect to other kids' scores taking the same test. |
| Testing Mom has a lot of good materials. |
National percentiles won't change, but otherwise, you're correct. The in-pool cutoff is selected to capture the top 10% of FCPS students. Thanks to prepping, it's not necessarily capturing the correct top 10% of students. Keep in mind that the in-pool cutoff has been steadily increasing. In the past, 130 on any one subtest was enough to fall in the top 10% of students. FCPS kids aren't getting that much smarter in that short of a time. |