Do Men Have Honor?

[Anonymous]

Men are motivated by sex. Achievers almost all have a high sex drive and a chip on their shoulder deep inside. These people invented and created everything we have in modern life. It's important to face reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men are motivated by sex. Achievers almost all have a high sex drive and a chip on their shoulder deep inside. These people invented and created everything we have in modern life. It's important to face reality.

Maybe we should give men a pill to calm them down if they cant control themselves. Testosterone blockers or something

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It just gets more exposure. There were 765 homicides in Chicago last year, and murderers tend to be men. That's just in one city, but the number of murderers in Chicago in one year vastly outnumbers the number of Hollywood actors/producers who are sexually harrassing. Just one makes better headlines than the other.

How did you find out how many murders were committed in Chicago last year? Did you do a personal count or was it by reading/watching/listening to news?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men are motivated by sex. Achievers almost all have a high sex drive and a chip on their shoulder deep inside. These people invented and created everything we have in modern life. It's important to face reality.

Most technological advances were motivated by sex, greed or war.

[Anonymous]

In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

Actually when you look at patterns of mating before the modern era the vast majority of men did not reproduce. Women have always been the choosers and chosen the best, most attractive and strong partners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

And in nature, the females tend to breed with as many of the high quality makes as possible to ensure the strongest offspring. Would you be trotting out these BS evolutionary psychology talking points in response to a story about a woman cheating on her husband with multiple younger, better looking, more virile men?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

And in nature, the females tend to breed with as many of the high quality makes as possible to ensure the strongest offspring. Would you be trotting out these BS evolutionary psychology talking points in response to a story about a woman cheating on her husband with multiple younger, better looking, more virile men?

+1

Male sperm declines rapidly with age, which is why we ladies cant help chasing young, hot, ripped pieces of ass. Sorry boys- just how it is!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

Actually when you look at patterns of mating before the modern era the vast majority of men did not reproduce. Women have always been the choosers and chosen the best, most attractive and strong partners.

You are right, but perhaps not in the way you think you are.

Before the "modern era," you had a small number of powerful men who did most of the reproducing while the majority of men were expendable, and one notch above the beasts of the fields. This is why men evolved to seek power, and in some cases rape. Women are never at top, but the limit on how many children a woman can bear has always made them less expendable, and so women always have more status than poor men, but less than powerful men. In life, men are either winners or losers. For women, there's a big gray area, so there is less of an incentive to be ruthlessly ambitious and competitive. Historically, men have been forced to play a crueler game than women in order to have children and successfully provide for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

And in nature, the females tend to breed with as many of the high quality makes as possible to ensure the strongest offspring. Would you be trotting out these BS evolutionary psychology talking points in response to a story about a woman cheating on her husband with multiple younger, better looking, more virile men?

+1

Male sperm declines rapidly with age, which is why we ladies cant help chasing young, hot, ripped pieces of ass. Sorry boys- just how it is!

Weak troll. Save it for Reddit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

And in nature, the females tend to breed with as many of the high quality makes as possible to ensure the strongest offspring. Would you be trotting out these BS evolutionary psychology talking points in response to a story about a woman cheating on her husband with multiple younger, better looking, more virile men?

+1

Male sperm declines rapidly with age, which is why we ladies cant help chasing young, hot, ripped pieces of ass. Sorry boys- just how it is!

Weak troll. Save it for Reddit.

it's the truth! Dont blame us- blame biology! Facts!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

Actually when you look at patterns of mating before the modern era the vast majority of men did not reproduce. Women have always been the choosers and chosen the best, most attractive and strong partners.

You are right, but perhaps not in the way you think you are.

Before the "modern era," you had a small number of powerful men who did most of the reproducing while the majority of men were expendable, and one notch above the beasts of the fields. This is why men evolved to seek power, and in some cases rape. Women are never at top, but the limit on how many children a woman can bear has always made them less expendable, and so women always have more status than poor men, but less than powerful men. In life, men are either winners or losers. For women, there's a big gray area, so there is less of an incentive to be ruthlessly ambitious and competitive. Historically, men have been forced to play a crueler game than women in order to have children and successfully provide for them.

Rape was not as common as male fantasists want to believe. Most women go freely to the top percentage of guys. Just like most women would sleep with a male model.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

Actually when you look at patterns of mating before the modern era the vast majority of men did not reproduce. Women have always been the choosers and chosen the best, most attractive and strong partners.

You are right, but perhaps not in the way you think you are.

Before the "modern era," you had a small number of powerful men who did most of the reproducing while the majority of men were expendable, and one notch above the beasts of the fields. This is why men evolved to seek power, and in some cases rape. Women are never at top, but the limit on how many children a woman can bear has always made them less expendable, and so women always have more status than poor men, but less than powerful men. In life, men are either winners or losers. For women, there's a big gray area, so there is less of an incentive to be ruthlessly ambitious and competitive. Historically, men have been forced to play a crueler game than women in order to have children and successfully provide for them.

Rape was not as common as male fantasists want to believe. Most women go freely to the top percentage of guys. Just like most women would sleep with a male model.

Right. It's "male fantasists" who are constantly complaining about Rape Culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In Mother Nature, there is no free lunch. Males (not just the human kind) are expected to be powerful, confident, successful, desirable, change-makers with lots of children from young, fertile women, to ensure their DNA survives. And they have evolved to do just that.

Actually when you look at patterns of mating before the modern era the vast majority of men did not reproduce. Women have always been the choosers and chosen the best, most attractive and strong partners.

You are right, but perhaps not in the way you think you are.

Before the "modern era," you had a small number of powerful men who did most of the reproducing while the majority of men were expendable, and one notch above the beasts of the fields. This is why men evolved to seek power, and in some cases rape. Women are never at top, but the limit on how many children a woman can bear has always made them less expendable, and so women always have more status than poor men, but less than powerful men. In life, men are either winners or losers. For women, there's a big gray area, so there is less of an incentive to be ruthlessly ambitious and competitive. Historically, men have been forced to play a crueler game than women in order to have children and successfully provide for them.

Rape was not as common as male fantasists want to believe. Most women go freely to the top percentage of guys. Just like most women would sleep with a male model.

Right. It's "male fantasists" who are constantly complaining about Rape Culture.

You dont know what rape culture is, do you? Here's a hint: not every guy that fantasizes about rape actually gets to carry it out. Nor does every one who has entitlement issues to female bodies.

[Anonymous]

I think men have honor with each other and some with women but a lot of them consider women as inferiors to be used for sex, work or childbearing, not as equal humans.