Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. She uses a voice modulator to call the DNC attorney and mask her voice, but forgets to block her number.

Will you donkeys PLEASE throw her overboard? This is too easy!

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dnc-lawsuit-now-includes-claim-that-someone-in-debbie-wasserman-schultzs-office-used-voice-changer/article/2624876

Caller ID information is easily faked.

Well, apparently she didn't do it right, duuuuhhh.

BTW, did you see the court document, specifically the last page?

What I am suggesting is that someone else faked theirs to look like hers. Have you heard about swatting? This could be similar to that.

I bet Trump is setting her up!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea if this is tied to any kind of conspiracy or not - but, no, it doesn't look great! Did DWS know about any of the fraud? I don't know - probably not? Maybe? Did Hillary? Almost certainly not. But yeah - sure doesn't look great.

Now that I've said that, can you guys admit this Russia stuff is really troubling, too?

This is what we call hard evidence by lawmakers.

[Anonymous]

Prediction - all democrats turn on DWS and claim "they knew nothing" about this and express "shock, TOTAL SHOCK"!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. She uses a voice modulator to call the DNC attorney and mask her voice, but forgets to block her number.

Will you donkeys PLEASE throw her overboard? This is too easy!

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dnc-lawsuit-now-includes-claim-that-someone-in-debbie-wasserman-schultzs-office-used-voice-changer/article/2624876

Caller ID information is easily faked.

Well, apparently she didn't do it right, duuuuhhh.

BTW, did you see the court document, specifically the last page?

What I am suggesting is that someone else faked theirs to look like hers. Have you heard about swatting? This could be similar to that.

I bet Trump is setting her up!!

No! It was the Russians! They did it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Daily Caller has been reporting this for months. The reporter has included links to documentation of the events in almost every story. And, yet, no one has much picked this story up. This is what is known as "media bias." Selective reporting.

These people have had access to the emails of lots of Dems. They likely were familiar with computers at the DNC, as well, since the guy just arrested is still on the payroll of DWS (or, at least he was at last report. In light of the arrest, perhaps she has fired him.)

Some of these people (maybe all of them) have dual citizenship with Pakistan. They were in trouble with the law on other issues (basic crookedness). How can this not have been a news story?

DWS is not just a Dem Congresswoman--she was Chair of the DNC. The DNC was hacked. It is accepted that the Russians were involved--but, how can any sane person not be suspicious that these guys might have a connection? Maybe, the Russians didn't hack the infor--maybe, these guys sold it to them. Or, maybe, just maybe, these are the ones responsible for WikiLeaks.

Isn't it odd that DWS still had him on her payroll after all the reports? The Capitol Police have one of the laptops that was mysteriously found stashed in a "crevice" in the Capitol. Is that not concerning to national security?

Had this been a Republican, this would have been front page news. For months.

This was not reported in today's WAPO print edition. I just did a search of the online edition--I could find nothing.

This is not fake news--and yet, it is not being reported. Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Are you both saying the guy was not arrested? That he was not working for the DNC/DWS? That there was no equipment of his in Capitol Police possession?

Just trying to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Daily Caller has been reporting this for months. The reporter has included links to documentation of the events in almost every story. And, yet, no one has much picked this story up. This is what is known as "media bias." Selective reporting.

These people have had access to the emails of lots of Dems. They likely were familiar with computers at the DNC, as well, since the guy just arrested is still on the payroll of DWS (or, at least he was at last report. In light of the arrest, perhaps she has fired him.)

Some of these people (maybe all of them) have dual citizenship with Pakistan. They were in trouble with the law on other issues (basic crookedness). How can this not have been a news story?

DWS is not just a Dem Congresswoman--she was Chair of the DNC. The DNC was hacked. It is accepted that the Russians were involved--but, how can any sane person not be suspicious that these guys might have a connection? Maybe, the Russians didn't hack the infor--maybe, these guys sold it to them. Or, maybe, just maybe, these are the ones responsible for WikiLeaks.

Isn't it odd that DWS still had him on her payroll after all the reports? The Capitol Police have one of the laptops that was mysteriously found stashed in a "crevice" in the Capitol. Is that not concerning to national security?

Had this been a Republican, this would have been front page news. For months.

This was not reported in today's WAPO print edition. I just did a search of the online edition--I could find nothing.

This is not fake news--and yet, it is not being reported. Why?

Alex Marlow was just saying even with all this hard evidence, he has no faith that DWS or any other Dem will be touched by it legally. There's corruption all right, but it's not Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Daily Caller has been reporting this for months. The reporter has included links to documentation of the events in almost every story. And, yet, no one has much picked this story up. This is what is known as "media bias." Selective reporting.

These people have had access to the emails of lots of Dems. They likely were familiar with computers at the DNC, as well, since the guy just arrested is still on the payroll of DWS (or, at least he was at last report. In light of the arrest, perhaps she has fired him.)

Some of these people (maybe all of them) have dual citizenship with Pakistan. They were in trouble with the law on other issues (basic crookedness). How can this not have been a news story?

DWS is not just a Dem Congresswoman--she was Chair of the DNC. The DNC was hacked. It is accepted that the Russians were involved--but, how can any sane person not be suspicious that these guys might have a connection? Maybe, the Russians didn't hack the infor--maybe, these guys sold it to them. Or, maybe, just maybe, these are the ones responsible for WikiLeaks.

Isn't it odd that DWS still had him on her payroll after all the reports? The Capitol Police have one of the laptops that was mysteriously found stashed in a "crevice" in the Capitol. Is that not concerning to national security?

Had this been a Republican, this would have been front page news. For months.

This was not reported in today's WAPO print edition. I just did a search of the online edition--I could find nothing.

This is not fake news--and yet, it is not being reported. Why?

Alex Marlow was just saying even with all this hard evidence, he has no faith that DWS or any other Dem will be touched by it legally. There's corruption all right, but it's not Trump.

Sure. Trump is a shining beacon of intelligence and integrity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesus, all that sensitive info flowing to Pakistan's ISI. That would be nuts.

I think you might be pushing this too hard, but then again just about every Democratic partisan is convinced every Russian is just part of Putin's master plot to destroy America. So if you're intending satire, good for you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Daily Caller has been reporting this for months. The reporter has included links to documentation of the events in almost every story. And, yet, no one has much picked this story up. This is what is known as "media bias." Selective reporting.

These people have had access to the emails of lots of Dems. They likely were familiar with computers at the DNC, as well, since the guy just arrested is still on the payroll of DWS (or, at least he was at last report. In light of the arrest, perhaps she has fired him.)

Some of these people (maybe all of them) have dual citizenship with Pakistan. They were in trouble with the law on other issues (basic crookedness). How can this not have been a news story?

DWS is not just a Dem Congresswoman--she was Chair of the DNC. The DNC was hacked. It is accepted that the Russians were involved--but, how can any sane person not be suspicious that these guys might have a connection? Maybe, the Russians didn't hack the infor--maybe, these guys sold it to them. Or, maybe, just maybe, these are the ones responsible for WikiLeaks.

Isn't it odd that DWS still had him on her payroll after all the reports? The Capitol Police have one of the laptops that was mysteriously found stashed in a "crevice" in the Capitol. Is that not concerning to national security?

Had this been a Republican, this would have been front page news. For months.

This was not reported in today's WAPO print edition. I just did a search of the online edition--I could find nothing.

This is not fake news--and yet, it is not being reported. Why?

Alex Marlow was just saying even with all this hard evidence, he has no faith that DWS or any other Dem will be touched by it legally. There's corruption all right, but it's not Trump.

Great! Then lets see his tax returns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. She uses a voice modulator to call the DNC attorney and mask her voice, but forgets to block her number.

Will you donkeys PLEASE throw her overboard? This is too easy!

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dnc-lawsuit-now-includes-claim-that-someone-in-debbie-wasserman-schultzs-office-used-voice-changer/article/2624876

Caller ID information is easily faked.

Well, apparently she didn't do it right, duuuuhhh.

BTW, did you see the court document, specifically the last page?

What I am suggesting is that someone else faked theirs to look like hers. Have you heard about swatting? This could be similar to that.

I bet Trump is setting her up!!

No! It was the Russians! They did it!

Through mind-control

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Daily Caller has been reporting this for months. The reporter has included links to documentation of the events in almost every story. And, yet, no one has much picked this story up. This is what is known as "media bias." Selective reporting.

These people have had access to the emails of lots of Dems. They likely were familiar with computers at the DNC, as well, since the guy just arrested is still on the payroll of DWS (or, at least he was at last report. In light of the arrest, perhaps she has fired him.)

Some of these people (maybe all of them) have dual citizenship with Pakistan. They were in trouble with the law on other issues (basic crookedness). How can this not have been a news story?

DWS is not just a Dem Congresswoman--she was Chair of the DNC. The DNC was hacked. It is accepted that the Russians were involved--but, how can any sane person not be suspicious that these guys might have a connection? Maybe, the Russians didn't hack the infor--maybe, these guys sold it to them. Or, maybe, just maybe, these are the ones responsible for WikiLeaks.

Isn't it odd that DWS still had him on her payroll after all the reports? The Capitol Police have one of the laptops that was mysteriously found stashed in a "crevice" in the Capitol. Is that not concerning to national security?

Had this been a Republican, this would have been front page news. For months.

This was not reported in today's WAPO print edition. I just did a search of the online edition--I could find nothing.

This is not fake news--and yet, it is not being reported. Why?

Alex Marlow was just saying even with all this hard evidence, he has no faith that DWS or any other Dem will be touched by it legally. There's corruption all right, but it's not Trump.

Sure. Trump is a shining beacon of intelligence and integrity.

This isn't about Trump (as you Dems love to deflect that way). It's about hard arrests and hard evidence in police custody, not fuzzy accusations by anonymous sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Are you both saying the guy was not arrested? That he was not working for the DNC/DWS? That there was no equipment of his in Capitol Police possession?

Just trying to understand.

I am saying that anytime the left gets caught doing the sleazy things they do, their fans screech "fake news!" in an attempt to deflect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only source on this is Fox, so it may not have even happened.

Ever hear the story about the boy who cried wolf?

Are you both saying the guy was not arrested? That he was not working for the DNC/DWS? That there was no equipment of his in Capitol Police possession?

Just trying to understand.

I am saying that anytime the left gets caught doing the sleazy things they do, their fans screech "fake news!" in an attempt to deflect.

I'm the PP, fully agree. FULLY!