What is the end game of George Soros

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The opposite of the Koch brothers.

Remember Sheldon Adelson?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The opposite of the Koch brothers.

Remember Sheldon Adelson?

I don’t. It’s hard to keep up with all the conspiracy theories these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.wsj.com/articles/george-soros-transfers-18-billion-to-his-foundation-creating-an-instant-giant-1508252926


Soros has no money. Read the article.

Who do you think runs/controls Open Society?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:George Soros financially backs politicians, DA's, etc that support his progressive policy. He has plenty of power himself, over 8 billion worth, he wants power for the progressive agenda. I don't know if he wants to abolish the USA like some want, or if he has a problem with the 1st or 2nd amendment. But when a DA lets a person back on the streets after they are arrested for a violent crime and they commit another crime, George has to bare some of the responsibility. He has violated no laws and has a right to spend his money as he sees fit

Bare?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The opposite of the Koch brothers.

Remember Sheldon Adelson?

I don’t. It’s hard to keep up with all the conspiracy theories these days.

Sheldon Adelson is not a conspiracy theory. He was a person.

[Anonymous]

Soros wants chaos not for any reason but because he wants to be relevant a “felt.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:George Soros financially backs politicians, DA's, etc that support his progressive policy. He has plenty of power himself, over 8 billion worth, he wants power for the progressive agenda. I don't know if he wants to abolish the USA like some want, or if he has a problem with the 1st or 2nd amendment. But when a DA lets a person back on the streets after they are arrested for a violent crime and they commit another crime, George has to bare some of the responsibility. He has violated no laws and has a right to spend his money as he sees fit

Why would Soros bear any of the responsibility? The DA let the violent criminal out; s/he is the one responsible (plus the criminal).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What exactly does he want for America?

He isn't the bogeyman that you or the right think he is. He is a distraction from the billionaires who are destroying our country: Prince/DeVos, Mercers, Koch's, Peter Thiel, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What exactly does he want for America?

He's just doing what he can to limit his estate tax exposure. The rest if just a jobs program.

Doubtful he is managing anything these days, did you see his photo lately? There is a bunch of moocher organizations probably running everything and promoting *their* agenda and whispering in his ear and getting funded, I doubt he runs his own funds. Humans always want to find some mastermind controlling everything. It's not "Lord of the Rings", lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"An eradication of income inequality."

"No nations and no borders anywhere in the world."

He wants the latter, and pays lip service to the former. Globalism accelerates income inequality. I don't think an intellectually honest person can simultaneously be for both without serious caveats.

He's a guy with an intense fear of nationalism. That's understandable for someone who escaped Nazi Germany. But unrestrained globalism is a major factor in why the US and Europe are suddenly in the throes of a nationalism uprising.

This. And it's extremely profitable for the stakeholders of multinational corporations. You can use and abuse labor in corrupt countries all day long. Why would multinationals be loyal to one country or another, wealth has no borders, and many wealthy people have more than one passport and homes.

The problem for the countries of 1st world where workers enjoyed better lives and rights is that they cannot compete with foreign labor and would not accept horrible work culture in sh**hole countries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.wsj.com/articles/george-soros-transfers-18-billion-to-his-foundation-creating-an-instant-giant-1508252926


Soros has no money. Read the article.

Who do you think runs/controls Open Society?

Who does the Open Society massively fund during elections?

(Hint: many of them are right here in the DMV)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He wants to destroy America and other countries from the inside out.

No - it's not that simple, and it doesn't fit his vision for the world.

He's in favor of eliminating borders; in the case of the EU, the internal borders are largely gone. He also seeks greater federalization of the EU, and eventual concentration of governmental power in Brussells under an efficient EU government. To accomish that goal, he sees the eventual elimination of national European governments.

He has similar plans for the North American continent (to include Central America) - eventually eliminating the U.S. Borders with Mexico and Canada, and going far beyond NAFTA as far as an integrated economy and trade.

Eventually, he seeks global income re-distribution to lift the 3rd world from poverty and create parity between every continent. To efficiently effect this vision, he sees an eventual one-world government without national interests to impede his vision of progress.

Main question is who is going to pay for this and who will be "distributing" resources . There is definitely a movement anyone with half a brain can see.. it has to do with reducing QOL of regular people in affluent countries and promoting austerity and reduction of your "life footprint" - carbon footprint, consumption of non essential goods, foods you eat (animal food sources), travel, keeping your homes comfortable, etc. As always we hear how peasants who are better off should share with poor peasants and strive to sacrifice, but we never hear how our "lords" are sharing... Funny to hear this come out from the jet and yacht crowd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:George Soros financially backs politicians, DA's, etc that support his progressive policy. He has plenty of power himself, over 8 billion worth, he wants power for the progressive agenda. I don't know if he wants to abolish the USA like some want, or if he has a problem with the 1st or 2nd amendment. But when a DA lets a person back on the streets after they are arrested for a violent crime and they commit another crime, George has to bare some of the responsibility. He has violated no laws and has a right to spend his money as he sees fit

Why would Soros bear any of the responsibility? The DA let the violent criminal out; s/he is the one responsible (plus the criminal).

Why would the Open Society Foundations bear any responsibility for the DA’s election, when all they did was give a little money to the campaign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He wants to destroy America and other countries from the inside out.

No - it's not that simple, and it doesn't fit his vision for the world.

He's in favor of eliminating borders; in the case of the EU, the internal borders are largely gone. He also seeks greater federalization of the EU, and eventual concentration of governmental power in Brussells under an efficient EU government. To accomish that goal, he sees the eventual elimination of national European governments.

He has similar plans for the North American continent (to include Central America) - eventually eliminating the U.S. Borders with Mexico and Canada, and going far beyond NAFTA as far as an integrated economy and trade.

Eventually, he seeks global income re-distribution to lift the 3rd world from poverty and create parity between every continent. To efficiently effect this vision, he sees an eventual one-world government without national interests to impede his vision of progress.

Main question is who is going to pay for this and who will be "distributing" resources . There is definitely a movement anyone with half a brain can see.. it has to do with reducing QOL of regular people in affluent countries and promoting austerity and reduction of your "life footprint" - carbon footprint, consumption of non essential goods, foods you eat (animal food sources), travel, keeping your homes comfortable, etc. As always we hear how peasants who are better off should share with poor peasants and strive to sacrifice, but we never hear how our "lords" are sharing... Funny to hear this come out from the jet and yacht crowd

Your paranoia is on full display. Wealthy elites really truly are screwing the average person very hard. But your mistake is clear when you mistake quality of life for higher levels of consumption. Quality of life is determined by many factors and “buying more stuff” is pretty low on that list. Democrats are a broad coalition of diverse groups, some of which are not exactly saints. That still does not mean that conspiracy theories are worth your time or that Republicans are somehow the saviors of the common man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:George Soros financially backs politicians, DA's, etc that support his progressive policy. He has plenty of power himself, over 8 billion worth, he wants power for the progressive agenda. I don't know if he wants to abolish the USA like some want, or if he has a problem with the 1st or 2nd amendment. But when a DA lets a person back on the streets after they are arrested for a violent crime and they commit another crime, George has to bare some of the responsibility. He has violated no laws and has a right to spend his money as he sees fit

Why would Soros bear any of the responsibility? The DA let the violent criminal out; s/he is the one responsible (plus the criminal).

Why would the Open Society Foundations bear any responsibility for the DA’s election, when all they did was give a little money to the campaign?

In some cases, it was A LOT of money. Progressive DAs only.