Christie Brinkley, 63, and her daughters is SI spread...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She must be taking bioidentical hormones.

Actually from what I've read, she attributes her looks to a vegan diet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure they all look good but there is some obvious photoshop going on in that photo. Nobody has lines that smooth on their thighs and hips. You can see the edges where they smoothed, and probably slimmed the body lines.

Honestly her butt in the side shot doesn't look that great even with photo shopping. Don't hate me for saying that, just an observation.

[Anonymous]

I wish she was holding both their hands, not just the one that favours her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wish she was holding both their hands, not just the one that favours her.

You are reading too much into it. She's got the one daughter towards her front holding her hand. The other daughter is towards her back. I will bet that they are standing that way to help steady their mom in case a wave comes and smacks her feet - she doesn't want to fall off whatever she is standing on...the hair alone, ugh. Plus she's got her one arm up over her head which is a flattering pose for her body.

[Anonymous]

All three of them look absolutely incredible! Wow!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She must be taking bioidentical hormones.

Actually from what I've read, she attributes her looks to a vegan diet.

Because celebrities don't lie about things like that.
Nicole Kidman never had botox either lol.

[Anonymous]

What -- cut it all off and look like a man? So stupid.

Anonymous wrote:Im not a fan of long hair past late 40s. Just looks a little too desperate. But maybe a red bikini does too! She looks amazing…definitely not arguing with that. But its kinda odd to keep trying to look EXACTLY how you looked in 1990. Evolve a little!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure they all look good but there is some obvious photoshop going on in that photo. Nobody has lines that smooth on their thighs and hips. You can see the edges where they smoothed, and probably slimmed the body lines.

Honestly her butt in the side shot doesn't look that great even with photo shopping. Don't hate me for saying that, just an observation.

She's fucking 73.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure they all look good but there is some obvious photoshop going on in that photo. Nobody has lines that smooth on their thighs and hips. You can see the edges where they smoothed, and probably slimmed the body lines.

Honestly her butt in the side shot doesn't look that great even with photo shopping. Don't hate me for saying that, just an observation.

She's fucking 73.

63 meant!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure they all look good but there is some obvious photoshop going on in that photo. Nobody has lines that smooth on their thighs and hips. You can see the edges where they smoothed, and probably slimmed the body lines.

Honestly her butt in the side shot doesn't look that great even with photo shopping. Don't hate me for saying that, just an observation.

She's fucking 73.

63 meant!!

True dat! PP, lets see how good your butt looks when you are 63.

[Anonymous]

To me, she will always be Clark Griswolds love interest.

Oh and she was great in parks and Rec! Good sport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure they all look good but there is some obvious photoshop going on in that photo. Nobody has lines that smooth on their thighs and hips. You can see the edges where they smoothed, and probably slimmed the body lines.

Honestly her butt in the side shot doesn't look that great even with photo shopping. Don't hate me for saying that, just an observation.

She's fucking 73.

63 meant!!

True dat! PP, lets see how good your butt looks when you are 63.

People were saying that she had a photo shopped "perfect" body - with lines, edges smoothed out. I noticed that she had a trouble spot - that was all. If anything that little imperfection proves that it is her real body we're looking at, no some photo shopped creation. No way will I have a body like her's at 63. I think she looks fabulous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sailor looks JUST like her. Literally, if I saw a picture of her I wouldn't know if it was her or Christie.

Poor Alexa - having Billy Joel's eyes and nose. She has a great body but her face is not pretty. The saddest thing is she's already HAD a nose job. It must be hard for her being in the Brinkley-Cook family.

Granted she looks nothing like Christie and the other daughter but I think she's cute. She just has a very different look than them.

I actually think Sailor is really plain. I think Alexa is striking. But the whole family is more attractive than most of course!

[Anonymous]

Are there any super models that look bad at that age? Gorgeous good genes remain gorgeous good genes. I can't really think of any that don't still look good.

I do wish she wasn't raising her arm hailing a taxi in every picture. It makes it looks like they are trying to hide something, stomach wise. And I'm sure it's nothing but it bothers me that they thought the nothing was worth trying to hide.

[Anonymous]

There is a quote where Christie is saying she feels the experience is so special with her daughters because she remembers being their age and posing for SI and "just hoping I was good enough for the magazine" and how it feels now having her daughters there -- does she want them hoping they are "good enough" too? That seems weird.