Golden Globes Fashion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Giuliana Rancic's dress was stunning. It looked better on live tv than pictures so I'm sure in person it was absolutely beautiful in person. It was very different but gorgeous. Can someone post a picture?

Hmmm..ordinarily I like the high neck, but it looks somehow off in the picture. Maybe it's just that her head looks weirdly sized on top of that dress with her being so stick thin. Her hair and makeup is a very harsh look -- not great for someone that bone thin. (I say this as a thin woman -- I almost never wear my hair up because it makes me look too skeletal.)

[/img]http://img.wennermedia.com/620-width/juliana-88a7b2d8-8b04-4757-80fd-08486a619804.jpg[img]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natalie Portman looked great.

Still channelling Jackie.

Seriously. And well done.

Is she pregnant? That's the only way I could like this look.

She is very pregnant. It's a lot more obvious from the side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt sorry for SJP, way too much of everything and it just aged her

Horrendous. No words

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judith light for the win!

Bethesda Bat Mitzvah grannie

[Anonymous]

Natalie Portman looked fabulous

[Anonymous]

http://www.etonline.com/slideshow/gallery/206768_golden_globes_2017_best_dressed/#15

This pepto bismol confection made the "best dressed" lists. Am I the only one who hated it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://www.etonline.com/slideshow/gallery/206768_golden_globes_2017_best_dressed/#15

This pepto bismol confection made the "best dressed" lists. Am I the only one who hated it?

No but that list is suspect as it also SJP as one of the 15 best dressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt sorry for SJP, way too much of everything and it just aged her

Horrendous. No words

+1 she is starting to head into Madonna territory

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt sorry for SJP, way too much of everything and it just aged her

Horrendous. No words

+1 she is starting to head into Madonna territory

Yep - notice how the sleeves hide the backs of her hands? (like Madonna, she has veiny hands and it's often pointed out).

I like SJP a lot, and I think we should celebrate women as they age, but SJP needs a style makeover.

[Anonymous]

SJP has a great figure and should be wearing things more like Judith Light's dress, but they BOTH need to lay off the aging dark eye makeup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judith light for the win!

Bethesda Bat Mitzvah grannie

In an awesome way. I think she looks fierce and age appropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Giuliana Rancic's dress was stunning. It looked better on live tv than pictures so I'm sure in person it was absolutely beautiful in person. It was very different but gorgeous. Can someone post a picture?

Hmmm..ordinarily I like the high neck, but it looks somehow off in the picture. Maybe it's just that her head looks weirdly sized on top of that dress with her being so stick thin. Her hair and makeup is a very harsh look -- not great for someone that bone thin. (I say this as a thin woman -- I almost never wear my hair up because it makes me look too skeletal.)

[/img]http://img.wennermedia.com/620-width/juliana-88a7b2d8-8b04-4757-80fd-08486a619804.jpg[img]

Idk I don't think she's attractive but that dress is really stunning. The details are sooo pretty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt sorry for SJP, way too much of everything and it just aged her

Horrendous. No words

+1 she is starting to head into Madonna territory

Yep - notice how the sleeves hide the backs of her hands? (like Madonna, she has veiny hands and it's often pointed out).

I like SJP a lot, and I think we should celebrate women as they age, but SJP needs a style makeover.

Plus that dress makes her look really wide.

[Anonymous]

SJP = awful

Reese = blah

Winona = aging beautifully

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Giuliana Rancic's dress was stunning. It looked better on live tv than pictures so I'm sure in person it was absolutely beautiful in person. It was very different but gorgeous. Can someone post a picture?

Hmmm..ordinarily I like the high neck, but it looks somehow off in the picture. Maybe it's just that her head looks weirdly sized on top of that dress with her being so stick thin. Her hair and makeup is a very harsh look -- not great for someone that bone thin. (I say this as a thin woman -- I almost never wear my hair up because it makes me look too skeletal.)

[/img]http://img.wennermedia.com/620-width/juliana-88a7b2d8-8b04-4757-80fd-08486a619804.jpg[img]

Idk I don't think she's attractive but that dress is really stunning. The details are sooo pretty

ITA.
- More prints on the red carpet PP