Melanie Trump's Project as First Lady

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You joke about having Melania make it her pet project. Maybe somebody should look into our cybersecurity. Nobody, especially Obama, cared until they could conflate it with Trump's win. By politicizing it, he undermines its seriousness with many Americans. He now appears disingenuous on the topic and that's a shame.


That is patently absurd. You don't know a thing about cybersecurity. And you don't read the news.


The PP is a Russian troll. They are out in full force on this board.



Russian troll!! Oh, PP, do you know his creative and comical you are. I haven't enjoyed such a witty retort since Hillary told the bartender to give her the bottle of brandy on election night just after she cancelled the fireworks.


Oh gash, being funny just isn't your thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why do some of you insist on calling her Melanie. It's not her name.


Because they want her name to be Melanie. And so, in their mind, it is Melanie. Like so many other things...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I doubt Melania Trump is smart enough to implement a program on anything other than posing nude and lying about fake degrees.


OMG! MISOGYNY!! SEXISM!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You joke about having Melania make it her pet project. Maybe somebody should look into our cybersecurity. Nobody, especially Obama, cared until they could conflate it with Trump's win. By politicizing it, he undermines its seriousness with many Americans. He now appears disingenuous on the topic and that's a shame.


That is patently absurd. You don't know a thing about cybersecurity. And you don't read the news.


The PP is a Russian troll. They are out in full force on this board.


It's hilarious how liberals resort to calling posters "trolls," or better yet, "Russian trolls" when they don't agree with them. Kind of the height of laziness, but oh well! Predictable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do some of you insist on calling her Melanie. It's not her name.


My iPhone autocorrects to that name sorry. I didn't catch that glitch.


Just say the Third Lady. It is easier.


And you're wondering why she might not feel comfortable in DC?


Nobody give two shits about the Third Mrs. Trump and whether she's comfortable.


Then why all the posts about her moving to DC or not?


Huh? Nothing unusual at all about having Lolita ... I mean Ivanka ... serve as FLOTUS. Melania should stay in NY as it's clear PEOTUS is too busy tweeting to spend time with his "wife" and the son whose existence he only begrudgingly acknowledges from time-to-time. Just take a look at the Christmas tweet of the Narcissist-in-Chief without any family members. Where's the family photo in front of the Christmas Tree or enjoying Christmas dinner together? Does he even have one or is he Ebeneeezer Scrooge incarnate? It's all very normal, right?


That's a lot of verbiage from someone who doesn't care.


Too funny.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.


Most people are upset about the security costs of $1 million per day. If Melania decided to live in the country or suburbia, no one would care because the cost to taxpayers would be much lower. I think we all know Ivanka will serve as First Lady, fulfilling Trump's fantasy of marrying his daughter.
Anonymous
Get a shrink, 00:09. You seem ill.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.


Seriously. Why would she want to be in a city full of people who so clearly disdain her? And by "people," obviously I mean the nonjudgmental, open-minded, welcoming liberals, of course.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.


Most people are upset about the security costs of $1 million per day. If Melania decided to live in the country or suburbia, no one would care because the cost to taxpayers would be much lower. I think we all know Ivanka will serve as First Lady, fulfilling Trump's fantasy of marrying his daughter.


You people are seriously deranged. The amount of time you spend on your sick fantasies is disturbing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.


Most people are upset about the security costs of $1 million per day. If Melania decided to live in the country or suburbia, no one would care because the cost to taxpayers would be much lower. I think we all know Ivanka will serve as First Lady, fulfilling Trump's fantasy of marrying his daughter.


You people are seriously deranged. The amount of time you spend on your sick fantasies is disturbing.


What sick fantasy are you referring to? Are you suggesting that security costs for Melania and Barron in NYC are actually much higher and it's a fantasy to assume they are only $1M?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.


Seriously. Why would she want to be in a city full of people who so clearly disdain her? And by "people," obviously I mean the nonjudgmental, open-minded, welcoming liberals, of course.


I was not aware she had plans to leave New York, which like DC, is no fan of the Trumps. Which red state is she heading to?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Melania's proeject for the next four years is to say as far away from the Donald as possible. Who can blame her?

Your project is to drive the hate.
That should keep you plenty busy.


Oh come on, if she really enjoyed being around him, she wouldn't be staying in NYC.

Pssst... Most of us understand the guy is a workaholic. Mrs. Trump has wisely built a full life for herself and child in Manhattan. No reason to come to Washington where she's so hated. Good for her. You haters can stay mad.


No one hates the Trumps more than the citizens of Manhatten, so your whole post is complete nonsense. Melania sees a way to keep her liefestyle and not have to put up with Trump. Again, who cane blame her?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You joke about having Melania make it her pet project. Maybe somebody should look into our cybersecurity. Nobody, especially Obama, cared until they could conflate it with Trump's win. By politicizing it, he undermines its seriousness with many Americans. He now appears disingenuous on the topic and that's a shame.


I work in Cybersecurity. The Obama Administration has done quite a lot for Cybersecurity so perhaps you should learn more before repeating right wing propaganda bullsh*t.


Oh, please do share your view of what Obama has done for cybersecurity, and offer your take on why Russia's hacking hasn't been talked about as an issue prior to the last few months until it became a concern as related to the election?


Upon entering office President Obama ordered the Cybersecurity Policy Review. He created the US Cyber Command in 2010 to name just two things off the top of my head.


umm, this doesn't actually count as doing anything, any more than "having a meeting" counts as landing a client. not saying cybersecurity (which could obviously be better) wouldn't have been even worse without obama but you surely understand that "ordering a review" and "creating a cyber command" doesn't mean anything of value has been accomplished.


So you expect the President to do pentesting and ethical hacking of all government computer systems? Also review the vulnerability scans?! WTH do you think a Oesident does exactly in his day to day job?!


what? no i expect to hear about metrics that show cybersecurity has in fact been improved under obama administration. like, proportion of attacks that were thwarted, that kind of thing. nobody expects obama personally to run anti-virus software on every computer FCS.

that some additional boards with "cybersecurity" in their names have been creates means implies as much about improvements in cybersecurity as a creation of a gov. agency "cancer cure now" implies about the state of cancer research.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I doubt Melania Trump is smart enough to implement a program on anything other than posing nude and lying about fake degrees.



I dunno. The Chicago farm girl, Michelle Obama, was able to have a veg and fruit garden planted. I find that staff is helpful.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: