Is the USA or CIA trying to shut down Wikileaks?

[Anonymous]

an unbiased....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is silence from US got so this confirms they had something to do with it. John kerry was in London yesterday.

There is also silence from Clinton campaign but she did post somthing about Alex Jones on social media implying that those on right are crazy.

I have no doubt that our US government is behind this.

I know, it's outrageous that the US government is trying to shut down an illegal enterprise that is trying to influence our election

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is silence from US got so this confirms they had something to do with it. John kerry was in London yesterday.

There is also silence from Clinton campaign but she did post somthing about Alex Jones on social media implying that those on right are crazy.

I have no doubt that our US government is behind this.

I know, it's outrageous that the US government is trying to shut down an illegal enterprise that is trying to influence our election

And disclose items harmful to our national security. I hope that we get our hands on Assange someday...the little Russian-owned ferret.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is silence from US got so this confirms they had something to do with it. John kerry was in London yesterday.

There is also silence from Clinton campaign but she did post somthing about Alex Jones on social media implying that those on right are crazy.

I have no doubt that our US government is behind this.

I like your logic. Because the US has not claimed responsibility, or denied it, you have no doubt that the US government is behind this. It could not have been the UK acting on her own, or at the behest of any other country. It must have been the US government, because they haven't denied doing it.

Does that logic also apply to the UK? Assange has only blamed a "state actor", not the US specifically, btw.

[Anonymous]

Is there some particular reason that Ecuador is protecting this guy? Is he a citizen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is there some particular reason that Ecuador is protecting this guy? Is he a citizen?

To stick it to the US, is my understanding.

But since they may be the state actor who has denied Assange internet access, they may not be protecting him much longer.

[Anonymous]

Obviously what has happened is Hillary hired Pamela Anderson as an assassin, to torture Assange to death with her vegan meal. Then Hillary droned everyone else in the wikileaks organization so she could take over and send out tweets pretending Assange is still alive.

[Anonymous]

I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

Exactly. The hypocrisy is astonishing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

I think it's much more important to continue to expose corruption without our own government. It's not going to get out to the people without something like this. And FWIW? I did not condemn Snowden either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously what has happened is Hillary hired Pamela Anderson as an assassin, to torture Assange to death with her vegan meal. Then Hillary droned everyone else in the wikileaks organization so she could take over and send out tweets pretending Assange is still alive.

YES! But you'll never see the lamestream media reporting on this! So rigged!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

Exactly. The hypocrisy is astonishing.

And vice versa!
Those who want to pardon Snowden are turning a blind eye to these wikileaks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

Exactly. The hypocrisy is astonishing.

And vice versa!
Those who want to pardon Snowden are turning a blind eye to these wikileaks.

NOPE! It was illegal when Snowden did it and it's illegal when Assange does it. I condemned them both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

Exactly. The hypocrisy is astonishing.

And vice versa!
Those who want to pardon Snowden are turning a blind eye to these wikileaks.

NOPE! It was illegal when Snowden did it and it's illegal when Assange does it. I condemned them both.

Is the corruption that you are seeing illegal as well? Or does it not count if its hidden from the American people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the people who condemned Snowden's Wikileaks dump are now actively rooting for the Wikileaks hacker dump.

Exactly. The hypocrisy is astonishing.

And vice versa!
Those who want to pardon Snowden are turning a blind eye to these wikileaks.

NOPE! It was illegal when Snowden did it and it's illegal when Assange does it. I condemned them both.

Is the corruption that you are seeing illegal as well? Or does it not count if its hidden from the American people?

There are legal ways of whistleblowing. Snowden chose not to follow them but instead to defect to Russia. Now he's just a loser criminal. As is Assange. Living in an embassy? For years? What a joke.