Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the girls think about her moving on so quickly to another man and new baby while they were in a situation that she couldn't really care for them. (And I'm assuming the best case that they're now 50/50) but at that time, he was pretty clearly the full time parent.

They probably think it's great to see mom happy and in a healthy relationship, unlike the crazy one they were witnessing.

Seriously, stop with the "moving on so quickly". It's been YEARS. Again you can't stand to see her move on. She looks better than ever and seems happy and healthy. Good for her!

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the girls think about her moving on so quickly to another man and new baby while they were in a situation that she couldn't really care for them. (And I'm assuming the best case that they're now 50/50) but at that time, he was pretty clearly the full time parent.

They probably think it's great to see mom happy and in a healthy relationship, unlike the crazy one they were witnessing.

Seriously, stop with the "moving on so quickly". It's been YEARS. Again you can't stand to see her move on. She looks better than ever and seems happy and healthy. Good for her!

+1

It's very very quick to recover from a very traumatic divorce, get whatever her personal situation was treated, get her girls stabilized (this in and of itself could take 2 years for them to adjust to their new situation), meet a guy, and pop out a baby.

I'd say the first half of that (recover from the divorce and create a stable new normal for the kids helping them process that) would take 2 years alone to do in a healthy way and then maybe you start seriously dating someone.

Or you meet someone, get married, and have a baby - that could also take 2 years.

Both in 2 years is nuts and certainly not in the best interest of small children getting whiplash from all the change

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what the girls think about her moving on so quickly to another man and new baby while they were in a situation that she couldn't really care for them. (And I'm assuming the best case that they're now 50/50) but at that time, he was pretty clearly the full time parent.

They probably think it's great to see mom happy and in a healthy relationship, unlike the crazy one they were witnessing.

Seriously, stop with the "moving on so quickly". It's been YEARS. Again you can't stand to see her move on. She looks better than ever and seems happy and healthy. Good for her!

+1

It's very very quick to recover from a very traumatic divorce, get whatever her personal situation was treated, get her girls stabilized (this in and of itself could take 2 years for them to adjust to their new situation), meet a guy, and pop out a baby.

I'd say the first half of that (recover from the divorce and create a stable new normal for the kids helping them process that) would take 2 years alone to do in a healthy way and then maybe you start seriously dating someone.

Or you meet someone, get married, and have a baby - that could also take 2 years.

Both in 2 years is nuts and certainly not in the best interest of small children getting whiplash from all the change

I didn't realize you made the rules. What works for one person doesn't always work for another. Again, she seems happy and healthy. Why not just be happy for her??

[Anonymous]

*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

+1 I'm amazed at the hypocrisy on this topic. Any normal DCUM poster would be appalled at hearing that a mother had lost custody of her kids, gone to rehab, remarried AND had another baby with new spouse in the span of 2 years (especially considering she was in rehab for a part of that). Everyone seems intent on placing all of the blame on Kane, but you can't blame him for someone else's addiction! And we all know how difficult it is for mothers to lose custody in the eyes of the court so you can't really blame that on him either. I agree he seems like a jerk, but the facts speak for themselves. It seems like she lost her kids and set out to create a new family as quickly as possible so, yes, I am completely judging her for that. Also not understanding why she's even bringing up the divorce and any residual issues on her blog and social med if she's truly trying to move past it. Glad to see the girls have access to both parents now though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

+1 I'm amazed at the hypocrisy on this topic. Any normal DCUM poster would be appalled at hearing that a mother had lost custody of her kids, gone to rehab, remarried AND had another baby with new spouse in the span of 2 years (especially considering she was in rehab for a part of that). Everyone seems intent on placing all of the blame on Kane, but you can't blame him for someone else's addiction! And we all know how difficult it is for mothers to lose custody in the eyes of the court so you can't really blame that on him either. I agree he seems like a jerk, but the facts speak for themselves. It seems like she lost her kids and set out to create a new family as quickly as possible so, yes, I am completely judging her for that. Also not understanding why she's even bringing up the divorce and any residual issues on her blog and social med if she's truly trying to move past it. Glad to see the girls have access to both parents now though.

Yeah - this isn't uncharted self exploration territory. There is a lot of research and professional guidance on how to best help children cope with any one of these changes in their lives. Speed may have been what made her / her bank account feel better but she wasn't the main casualty of all of this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

Oh good god. Maybe someday soon the children can start a blog so you can read their every thought and clutch your pearls. *SHE* talks about her experience because it's *HER* blog. The kids are none of your business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

+1 I'm amazed at the hypocrisy on this topic. Any normal DCUM poster would be appalled at hearing that a mother had lost custody of her kids, gone to rehab, remarried AND had another baby with new spouse in the span of 2 years (especially considering she was in rehab for a part of that). Everyone seems intent on placing all of the blame on Kane, but you can't blame him for someone else's addiction! And we all know how difficult it is for mothers to lose custody in the eyes of the court so you can't really blame that on him either. I agree he seems like a jerk, but the facts speak for themselves. It seems like she lost her kids and set out to create a new family as quickly as possible so, yes, I am completely judging her for that. Also not understanding why she's even bringing up the divorce and any residual issues on her blog and social med if she's truly trying to move past it. Glad to see the girls have access to both parents now though.

And again, for the 9 millionth time:

It's been longer than 2 years.
You literally know nothing about what really happened.
How much hearsay are you gonna believe just because it has been said here?

[Anonymous]

Natasha doesn’t have to tell anyone anything but what she wants to tell them! It’s her blog about her crafts and whatever! Get a grip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

+1 I'm amazed at the hypocrisy on this topic. Any normal DCUM poster would be appalled at hearing that a mother had lost custody of her kids, gone to rehab, remarried AND had another baby with new spouse in the span of 2 years (especially considering she was in rehab for a part of that). Everyone seems intent on placing all of the blame on Kane, but you can't blame him for someone else's addiction! And we all know how difficult it is for mothers to lose custody in the eyes of the court so you can't really blame that on him either. I agree he seems like a jerk, but the facts speak for themselves. It seems like she lost her kids and set out to create a new family as quickly as possible so, yes, I am completely judging her for that. Also not understanding why she's even bringing up the divorce and any residual issues on her blog and social med if she's truly trying to move past it. Glad to see the girls have access to both parents now though.

And again, for the 9 millionth time:

It's been longer than 2 years.
You literally know nothing about what really happened.
How much hearsay are you gonna believe just because it has been said here?

Umm not sure why you're so defensive about her, but court records don't lie. Not sure how people can misunderstand her being ordered to rehab (court record) and losing custody. I don't think that's hearsay.

Also, we wouldn't be discussing this at all if she hadn't BROUGHT IT UP HERSELF in her blog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

+1 I'm amazed at the hypocrisy on this topic. Any normal DCUM poster would be appalled at hearing that a mother had lost custody of her kids, gone to rehab, remarried AND had another baby with new spouse in the span of 2 years (especially considering she was in rehab for a part of that). Everyone seems intent on placing all of the blame on Kane, but you can't blame him for someone else's addiction! And we all know how difficult it is for mothers to lose custody in the eyes of the court so you can't really blame that on him either. I agree he seems like a jerk, but the facts speak for themselves. It seems like she lost her kids and set out to create a new family as quickly as possible so, yes, I am completely judging her for that. Also not understanding why she's even bringing up the divorce and any residual issues on her blog and social med if she's truly trying to move past it. Glad to see the girls have access to both parents now though.

And again, for the 9 millionth time:

It's been longer than 2 years.
You literally know nothing about what really happened.
How much hearsay are you gonna believe just because it has been said here?

How long has it been?

You seem completely invested in making her seem like the innocent party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*SHE* seems, the point is - how are the children coping?

Clearly it was about *HER* experience, healing, etc - I would think a mother would be VERY focused on her children before her romantic life after such a tumultuous period during their developmental years, but you're right - I don't make the rules.

+1 I'm amazed at the hypocrisy on this topic. Any normal DCUM poster would be appalled at hearing that a mother had lost custody of her kids, gone to rehab, remarried AND had another baby with new spouse in the span of 2 years (especially considering she was in rehab for a part of that). Everyone seems intent on placing all of the blame on Kane, but you can't blame him for someone else's addiction! And we all know how difficult it is for mothers to lose custody in the eyes of the court so you can't really blame that on him either. I agree he seems like a jerk, but the facts speak for themselves. It seems like she lost her kids and set out to create a new family as quickly as possible so, yes, I am completely judging her for that. Also not understanding why she's even bringing up the divorce and any residual issues on her blog and social med if she's truly trying to move past it. Glad to see the girls have access to both parents now though.

And again, for the 9 millionth time:

It's been longer than 2 years.
You literally know nothing about what really happened.
How much hearsay are you gonna believe just because it has been said here?

Umm not sure why you're so defensive about her, but court records don't lie. Not sure how people can misunderstand her being ordered to rehab (court record) and losing custody. I don't think that's hearsay.

Also, we wouldn't be discussing this at all if she hadn't BROUGHT IT UP HERSELF in her blog.

Where is the proof of it being court record? Please provide the public record if it’s not hearsay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still can't get over the fact that she found another husband and got married and pregnant only 2 years after a divorce and rehab stint. Girlfriend didn't waste any time finding another way to avoid working.

She’s hot. That’s all it takes. Men are stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still can't get over the fact that she found another husband and got married and pregnant only 2 years after a divorce and rehab stint. Girlfriend didn't waste any time finding another way to avoid working.

She’s hot. That’s all it takes. Men are stupid.

That’s the most honest thing on this board we’ve seen since the court said she lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still can't get over the fact that she found another husband and got married and pregnant only 2 years after a divorce and rehab stint. Girlfriend didn't waste any time finding another way to avoid working.

She’s hot. That’s all it takes. Men are stupid.

That’s the most honest thing on this board we’ve seen since the court said she lied.

But she's not even that hot. And she's got so much baggage.