Gary Johnson: "And what is Aleppo?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if Hillary had done the exact same thing, you'd be screaming that she isn't qualified to tour the Intrepid as a tourist.

Hillary wouldn't make that mistake.

Trump would, though. Difference is Trump would try to answer it instead of admitting he didn't know what it was.

Trump would respond by saying that it's really terrible and he would fix it in his first 30 days.

Believe him.

lol.. that was a joke, right? And how would he do that? Oh, right, he wouldn't give away his tactic or position. Oh, I know, he would bomb the hell out of them, killing every man, woman, child because that pix of the 5 yr old bloodied boy means zero, and he's just collateral damage, right?

[Anonymous]

While it's strange for anybody following current event not having heard of Aleppo... We really should not know or care. Let alone fight there.

[Anonymous]

William Weld should be at the top of that ticket.

[Anonymous]

I'd still take Johnson over Trump because I think Johnson will actually take the time to learn more and listen to other people who know more rather than assume he knows everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least he admitted he didn't know...?

Props for honesty.

Our bar for presidential candidates is so low!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.

The way MB repeated "ALEPPO" and seared into him with his eyes tells me it was an intentional attempt to expose Johnson for his ignorance.

Um, This is what it means to have Aleppo seared into you:

It means a transparently fake photo staged for political purposes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if Hillary had done the exact same thing, you'd be screaming that she isn't qualified to tour the Intrepid as a tourist.

Hillary wouldn't make that mistake.

Trump would, though. Difference is Trump would try to answer it instead of admitting he didn't know what it was.

Trump would respond by saying that it's really terrible and he would fix it in his first 30 days.

He would build a wall to keep Aleppo out. Bad guy.

Bad? Sounds awesome to me. Doesn't go far enough, though. We need a wall big enough to keep ALL of Syria out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least he admitted he didn't know...?

Props for honesty.

Our bar for presidential candidates is so low!

Only male candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a carefully chosen gotcha question - no doubt. They prob have data that shows Johnson is stealing more votes from Hillary than from Trump.

The way MB repeated "ALEPPO" and seared into him with his eyes tells me it was an intentional attempt to expose Johnson for his ignorance.

Um, This is what it means to have Aleppo seared into you:

It means a transparently fake photo staged for political purposes?

Is that you, Alex Jones? Go away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While it's strange for anybody following current event not having heard of Aleppo... We really should not know or care. Let alone fight there.

? We shouldn't know or care about world events and that there is a humanitarian crisis? Okaaay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if Hillary had done the exact same thing, you'd be screaming that she isn't qualified to tour the Intrepid as a tourist.

Hillary wouldn't make that mistake.

Trump would, though. Difference is Trump would try to answer it instead of admitting he didn't know what it was.

Trump would respond by saying that it's really terrible and he would fix it in his first 30 days.

He would build a wall to keep Aleppo out. Bad guy.

Bad? Sounds awesome to me. Doesn't go far enough, though. We need a wall big enough to keep ALL of Syria out.

Better get to work on that marvel of engineering. Or maybe Trump can talk to the generals he hasn't fired about altering the time-space continuum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it's strange for anybody following current event not having heard of Aleppo... We really should not know or care. Let alone fight there.

? We shouldn't know or care about world events and that there is a humanitarian crisis? Okaaay.

No, Americans should not care about humanitarian crises elsewhere.

In point of fact, "we should mind our own business" used to be the basic Libertarian foreign policy platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if Hillary had done the exact same thing, you'd be screaming that she isn't qualified to tour the Intrepid as a tourist.

Hillary wouldn't make that mistake.

Trump would, though. Difference is Trump would try to answer it instead of admitting he didn't know what it was.

Trump would respond by saying that it's really terrible and he would fix it in his first 30 days.

He would build a wall to keep Aleppo out. Bad guy.

Bad? Sounds awesome to me. Doesn't go far enough, though. We need a wall big enough to keep ALL of Syria out.

Better get to work on that marvel of engineering. Or maybe Trump can talk to the generals he hasn't fired about altering the time-space continuum.

I'm an engineer. A wall is totally do-able. Don't need to alter space-time continuum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if Hillary had done the exact same thing, you'd be screaming that she isn't qualified to tour the Intrepid as a tourist.

Hillary wouldn't make that mistake.

Trump would, though. Difference is Trump would try to answer it instead of admitting he didn't know what it was.

Trump would respond by saying that it's really terrible and he would fix it in his first 30 days.

He would build a wall to keep Aleppo out. Bad guy.

Bad? Sounds awesome to me. Doesn't go far enough, though. We need a wall big enough to keep ALL of Syria out.

Better get to work on that marvel of engineering. Or maybe Trump can talk to the generals he hasn't fired about altering the time-space continuum.

I'm an engineer. A wall is totally do-able. Don't need to alter space-time continuum.

Do-able? OK, Bob the Builder, we understand that walls can be built and this happens every day, but can you outline the alchemy of an impenetrable barrier that would keep out Syrians? Will the Children of the Forest help construct it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it's strange for anybody following current event not having heard of Aleppo... We really should not know or care. Let alone fight there.

? We shouldn't know or care about world events and that there is a humanitarian crisis? Okaaay.

No, Americans should not care about humanitarian crises elsewhere.

In point of fact, "we should mind our own business" used to be the basic Libertarian foreign policy platform.

Well, I'm thankful that the Libertarians aren't ruling this country. So, if there is a humanitarian crisis the US shouldn't help. We should not be involved in NATO or the UN. We should build a wall around this country and stick our heads in the ground. Can you name me one successful country that has this kind of foreign policy, where they are not involved in the UN or provide humanitarian assistance?