Survivor: New Millennials vs. Gen X

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Sandra has won twice, and she is a minority. She had no right to win either time, she floated her way to the top and no one was smart enough to get her out.

How is it that "she had no right to win?"

Exactly, Said like a true white male. She had a right to win. She won.

Since you are quoting me, race has nothing to do with it, it was the fact she did nothing in the game to deserve both wins. Her "game" was, as long as the vote isn't me.....she went along with the majority and it worked, twice.

I have watched Survivor from day 1, there are times that the winner shouldn't have won, and it was a bitter jury that got the winner to win. Russell Hantz (the first go around) is a great example of this.

Besides avoiding elimination at 15+ tribal councils, ensuring the jury is not bitter about you at the end is key to winning.

The jury should respect game play. This is a problem on Big Brother as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Sandra has won twice, and she is a minority. She had no right to win either time, she floated her way to the top and no one was smart enough to get her out.

How is it that "she had no right to win?"

Exactly, Said like a true white male. She had a right to win. She won.

Since you are quoting me, race has nothing to do with it, it was the fact she did nothing in the game to deserve both wins. Her "game" was, as long as the vote isn't me.....she went along with the majority and it worked, twice.

I have watched Survivor from day 1, there are times that the winner shouldn't have won, and it was a bitter jury that got the winner to win. Russell Hantz (the first go around) is a great example of this.

Besides avoiding elimination at 15+ tribal councils, ensuring the jury is not bitter about you at the end is key to winning.

The jury should respect game play. This is a problem on Big Brother as well.

Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.

Big Brother is a different story. I think the producers manipulate every outcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Sandra has won twice, and she is a minority. She had no right to win either time, she floated her way to the top and no one was smart enough to get her out.

How is it that "she had no right to win?"

Exactly, Said like a true white male. She had a right to win. She won.

Since you are quoting me, race has nothing to do with it, it was the fact she did nothing in the game to deserve both wins. Her "game" was, as long as the vote isn't me.....she went along with the majority and it worked, twice.

I have watched Survivor from day 1, there are times that the winner shouldn't have won, and it was a bitter jury that got the winner to win. Russell Hantz (the first go around) is a great example of this.

Besides avoiding elimination at 15+ tribal councils, ensuring the jury is not bitter about you at the end is key to winning.

The jury should respect game play. This is a problem on Big Brother as well.

Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.

Big Brother is a different story. I think the producers manipulate every outcome.

I dropped CBS All Access earlier in the month but you may be on to something: https://twitter.com/MrKamKindschi/status/791503643774029824

You have to listen really close around the 12-15 second mark, to see what that tweeter is referencing.

All I know is if I were on either of these shows and made it to jury, I would leave bias out of it, even if I am being the sole vote for someone at the end.

[Anonymous]

glad Figgy is gone!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:glad Figgy is gone!

+1!! I'm bored overall with this season, but was very happy with the vote

[Anonymous]

Well, Michaela, that is why you don't talk trash on Survivor, because you got blindsided and voted out!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Michaela, that is why you don't talk trash on Survivor, because you got blindsided and voted out!

I just felt the vibe the whole episode that her team was going to lose and she was going home. I really liked her and she was a strong player. I think if she could have learned to be a little less her and straightforward, she could have won this thing. Now I'm rooting for the ex college football player (forgot his name).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Sandra has won twice, and she is a minority. She had no right to win either time, she floated her way to the top and no one was smart enough to get her out.

How is it that "she had no right to win?"

Exactly, Said like a true white male. She had a right to win. She won.

Since you are quoting me, race has nothing to do with it, it was the fact she did nothing in the game to deserve both wins. Her "game" was, as long as the vote isn't me.....she went along with the majority and it worked, twice.

I have watched Survivor from day 1, there are times that the winner shouldn't have won, and it was a bitter jury that got the winner to win. Russell Hantz (the first go around) is a great example of this.

Besides avoiding elimination at 15+ tribal councils, ensuring the jury is not bitter about you at the end is key to winning.

The jury should respect game play. This is a problem on Big Brother as well.

The jury is still part of the game, and payback is a bitch. If somebody double-crossed me and I was voted off, you can be damn sure I would vote against them when the time came.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, Michaela, that is why you don't talk trash on Survivor, because you got blindsided and voted out!

I just felt the vibe the whole episode that her team was going to lose and she was going home. I really liked her and she was a strong player. I think if she could have learned to be a little less her and straightforward, she could have won this thing. Now I'm rooting for the ex college football player (forgot his name).

We loved Michaela. Fierce, funny, strong, great at competitions. Threatening qualities in a woman, so the boys had to get her out. I hope she comes back for another season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Michaela, that is why you don't talk trash on Survivor, because you got blindsided and voted out!

That isn't why she she as sent home. She was super smart and extremely competitive and athletic. Started fire when no one else could etc. she just spoke and trusted too much.
If she'd been modest and kept some ideas to herself she would have made it to the merge. I don't I'll miss her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Michaela, that is why you don't talk trash on Survivor, because you got blindsided and voted out!

I liked Michaela a lot, but she had to learn the hard way that social strategy was a big weakness. I agreed with her on everything she said about Figgy and that completely annoying showmance, but she needed to keep that to herself.

[Anonymous]

Why is the Boston cop telling everyone he's a funeral home director? I must have missed his reasoning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is the Boston cop telling everyone he's a funeral home director? I must have missed his reasoning.

He thinks people don't like cops. I don't get it either. That other guy Tony did it a few seasons ago too.

I am sad about Michaela being blindsided, but she went out with a bang. Good for her. Now I will have to root for that Oklahoma guy - not the basketball player, but the one who looks a little out of place. Can't remember his name. But he is funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Michaela, that is why you don't talk trash on Survivor, because you got blindsided and voted out!

Bye bye Felicia!

[Anonymous]

Michaela was very pretty and she won A LOT of challenges, but I wonder if her mouth got on people's nerves. It was cute for a out take or two but I wonder what being around her 24/7 would be like ...