NY Post publishes nude photos of Melania

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm somewhat shocked that Mr. Jeff would want to put nude photos up of such a beautiful woman.

He's now hittin' below the belt. Folks are starting to get really worried that Trump will win, so let's pull out all the stops. They're desperate.

What else can you do to try to embarrass him?
Perhaps nude photos of his daughters will be next?

The reality is, and recent history has shown this..... that when folks “hit below the belt” when it comes to Trump, it only makes his support grow.

So the creation of this thread can backfire? Perhaps someone isn't so wise after all.

This thread was created to talk about the story. It seems to be succeeding.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm somewhat shocked that Mr. Jeff would want to put nude photos up of such a beautiful woman.

He's now hittin' below the belt. Folks are starting to get really worried that Trump will win, so let's pull out all the stops. They're desperate.

What else can you do to try to embarrass him?
Perhaps nude photos of his daughters will be next?

The reality is, and recent history has shown this..... that when folks “hit below the belt” when it comes to Trump, it only makes his support grow.

So the creation of this thread can backfire? Perhaps someone isn't so wise after all.

This thread was created to talk about the story. It seems to be succeeding.

My initial comment was about your desire to spread the beautiful woman's nude photos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the pictures will affect anyone's vote, but what will be really interesting is Trump's reaction. Will he handle it with a little bit of grace, for once in his life? Will he attack the Post for hating his wife? Will he congratulate himself for marrying someone prettier than Bill Clinton? Anything is possible!

It will Have an effective the Evangelical, ultra conservative vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the pictures will affect anyone's vote, but what will be really interesting is Trump's reaction. Will he handle it with a little bit of grace, for once in his life? Will he attack the Post for hating his wife? Will he congratulate himself for marrying someone prettier than Bill Clinton? Anything is possible!

It will Have an effective the Evangelical, ultra conservative vote.

Nah, they've already decided to overlook his shortcomings, hold their noses, and vote for him. This won't change that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the pictures will affect anyone's vote, but what will be really interesting is Trump's reaction. Will he handle it with a little bit of grace, for once in his life? Will he attack the Post for hating his wife? Will he congratulate himself for marrying someone prettier than Bill Clinton? Anything is possible!

It will Have an effective the Evangelical, ultra conservative vote.

Because Hillary might now be the better choice? I doubt it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the pictures will affect anyone's vote, but what will be really interesting is Trump's reaction. Will he handle it with a little bit of grace, for once in his life? Will he attack the Post for hating his wife? Will he congratulate himself for marrying someone prettier than Bill Clinton? Anything is possible!

It will Have an effective the Evangelical, ultra conservative vote.

Nah, they've already decided to overlook his shortcomings, hold their noses, and vote for him. This won't change that.

Agree.

[Anonymous]

Fashion? These photos are nothing more than soft core porn.

[Anonymous]

I wonder how he is going to blame Hillary. Maybe his pal Aimed 's, help him.

[Anonymous]

It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the pictures will affect anyone's vote, but what will be really interesting is Trump's reaction. Will he handle it with a little bit of grace, for once in his life? Will he attack the Post for hating his wife? Will he congratulate himself for marrying someone prettier than Bill Clinton? Anything is possible!

It will Have an effective the Evangelical, ultra conservative vote.

Nah, they've already decided to overlook his shortcomings, hold their noses, and vote for him. This won't change that.

Agree.

They aren't really evangelical Christians deciding upon a political candidate to support. They are right-wing racists deciding upon a phony religion to follow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fashion? These photos are nothing more than soft core porn.

Maybe someone put this thread in the wrong section.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When are they going to post Hillary’s nude photos? Or, Bill’s?

The current Mrs. Trump was a professional model and signed a release. It's not as though these were personal pix stolen off a phone. Yes, she has a beautiful body, but no, it's not what we need for a first lady. Not even Berlusconi's wife was that lewd. Melania is a bit of an empty shell in a very toned package.

Personally, the photos of her aren't much more shocking than the ones where she's barely dressed. But it's interesting that the first black Miss America lost her crown when sexually suggestive photos were released of her. Yes, she voluntarily modeled for them and signed a release years earlier just like Melania, but double standards abound.

[Anonymous]

Now the door has been opened for photo-shopped pictures of a nude Hillary - and maybe even Chelsea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When are they going to post Hillary’s nude photos? Or, Bill’s?

The current Mrs. Trump was a professional model and signed a release. It's not as though these were personal pix stolen off a phone. Yes, she has a beautiful body, but no, it's not what we need for a first lady. Not even Berlusconi's wife was that lewd. Melania is a bit of an empty shell in a very toned package.

Personally, the photos of her aren't much more shocking than the ones where she's barely dressed. But it's interesting that the first black Miss America lost her crown when sexually suggestive photos were released of her. Yes, she voluntarily modeled for them and signed a release years earlier just like Melania, but double standards abound.

Yes, Bonnie and Clyde know about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how illegal drug use by presidents during their youth is ok, but nude modeling pictures of a candidate's spouse is something to be "ashamed" of. For one, she looks amazing! And two, if democrats want to use/spin this as a negative against her doesn't that fly in the face of the supposed sexual/feminine/artistic/cultural (she is European and nudity is treated much differently in the U.S. re: taboo) freedom, liberation, allegedly pro-women stance the party purports?

You can twist yourself into rhetorical knots if you wish, but real American conservatives believe in modesty, not doing nude photo shoots for some spare cash. It's OK if you're Madonna, but not if you're Miss America or the First Lady.