CMI expanding?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:77 kids over the next 10 years? Hardly anything to get your panties in a bunch over people.

Agree. But the very low class sizes were a differentiator and source of pride for many enrolled (and prospective) families. Not surprised this shift is sparking discussion and probably some snark here from those who are jealous or thought it was not sustainable.

Agree, but going from 17 to 18 in ECE and going from 18 to 20 is really not much to get dramatic about (to pay for all the things CMI says they do).

I see people snark at MV when they expanded, they snarked at YY when they raised prices to pay for all their aftercare and now they snark at CMI.

I tell you what, pay charter schools equal per student funding and then we won't have to go through this every third/fourth year when a school finds its perm location.

Or is it just me having lived through this for 20 years of charter schools?

Maybe CM should raise aftercare prices instead. YY has 16 kids in ECE and 18 kids per classroom in k-5.

Always amazes me when people pull numbers out of their... the air... and don't care whether it's accurate or not.

Please cite your source for these class numbers at YY, because we have kids in both ECE and upper grades and the numbers in both classrooms are larger than you're saying. And as far as I know they always have been. What is your source for the numbers you quote above?

You can count up the number of kids per each classroom in the *class directories* on the family portal.

And for classrooms in grades 3-5 there are less than 18 per classroom.