Duggar son allegedly molested girls including sisters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all are judge jury and executioner, huh?

I think the most important question is, has he outgrown it? He has a daughter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The TMZ article says the girls were "sometimes interacting with him." Sounds like (at least some of) the cases were consensual.

When I was 14, my also 14 year old boyfriend fondled me it the hot tub in his parents backyard. Completely consensual. Are you all outraged?

At 14, plenty of boyfriend and girlfriend couples are having sex. Others are making out. But not with their sisters, while they sleep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The TMZ article says the girls were "sometimes interacting with him." Sounds like (at least some of) the cases were consensual.

When I was 14, my also 14 year old boyfriend fondled me it the hot tub in his parents backyard. Completely consensual. Are you all outraged?

It was 5 girls. Some of the girls were many years younger than him. I can't believe people are actually defending this!!! Police report also says one oh the girls ran out of the room and told. Not consensual. First sister to eat him out will get all the TLC money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you all are judge jury and executioner, huh?

I think the most important question is, has he outgrown it? He has a daughter.

Sadly most child molesters don't outgrow it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The TMZ article says the girls were "sometimes interacting with him." Sounds like (at least some of) the cases were consensual.

When I was 14, my also 14 year old boyfriend fondled me it the hot tub in his parents backyard. Completely consensual. Are you all outraged?

Nice try. The "interacting with him" comment did not imply that they were interacting sexually, just that in those cases they weren't asleep.

[Anonymous]

I would be shocked if the show isn't canceled. I'm not saying it should or it shouldn't, just that I would be surprised if TLC didn't yank it.

[Anonymous]

Is anyone forgetting that this includes his SISTERS??? that's not innocent to do that! THAT IS WRONG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The TMZ article says the girls were "sometimes interacting with him." Sounds like (at least some of) the cases were consensual.

When I was 14, my also 14 year old boyfriend fondled me it the hot tub in his parents backyard. Completely consensual. Are you all outraged?

Nice try. The "interacting with him" comment did not imply that they were interacting sexually, just that in those cases they weren't asleep.

Right. Police report says one time they were reading a book (interacting).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The TMZ article says the girls were "sometimes interacting with him." Sounds like (at least some of) the cases were consensual.

When I was 14, my also 14 year old boyfriend fondled me it the hot tub in his parents backyard. Completely consensual. Are you all outraged?

Nice try. The "interacting with him" comment did not imply that they were interacting sexually, just that in those cases they weren't asleep.

Right. Police report says one time they were reading a book (interacting).

Poor girls. His sisters are all years younger than him. They may not have even known better.

[Anonymous]

easier way to see reports: http://imgur.com/a/zqPMi#0

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The TMZ article says the girls were "sometimes interacting with him." Sounds like (at least some of) the cases were consensual.

When I was 14, my also 14 year old boyfriend fondled me it the hot tub in his parents backyard. Completely consensual. Are you all outraged?

Nice try. The "interacting with him" comment did not imply that they were interacting sexually, just that in those cases they weren't asleep.

Right. Police report says one time they were reading a book (interacting).

Poor girls. His sisters are all years younger than him. They may not have even known better.

They did know better that's why they told on him. It was not a case of "doctor" otherwise Jim wouldn't have checked him into treatment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone surprised that Jim didn't try to sweep it under the rug?
He did what many parents would not do, he reported it.

He and his church buddies took Josh to see someone they were acquainted with who happened to be a cop who "gave him a stern talking to" and sent them home without doing anything. I'm sure they knew that's exactly how it was going to go from the outset. When the police actually tried to investigate it later he did everything he could to impede the investigation.

Do they actually go to church? I thought they just had church in their house with just their family?

Aren't juvenile records sealed?

[Anonymous]

I've watched this show for a loooong time. I don't agree with everything they do, but in general I've liked this family. I dislike that they are often targeted for their conservative Christian viewpoints, and have enjoyed seeing how you can make such a large family work.

This news is reprehensible, and I expect the show will be cancelled, and I have no problem with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone surprised that Jim didn't try to sweep it under the rug?
He did what many parents would not do, he reported it.

He and his church buddies took Josh to see someone they were acquainted with who happened to be a cop who "gave him a stern talking to" and sent them home without doing anything. I'm sure they knew that's exactly how it was going to go from the outset. When the police actually tried to investigate it later he did everything he could to impede the investigation.

Do they actually go to church? I thought they just had church in their house with just their family?

Aren't juvenile records sealed?

It's not his record, it's a police report with minor names redacted

[Anonymous]

Was it just his sisters or other non-family members?