I kind of love your whore self. Good for you, you were smart. |
My husband is very, very frugal . He's like the crazy Asian lady a while back. He spends very little. |
Close? The women are nothing more than employees contracted to run the household and provide sex. I'd say they are dead on prostitutes. How many of these women would stay in the "positions" if the Wife Bonus was taken away? Yeah, not many. |
| Allowances are 't just for SAHMs! My husband has an allowance of 350 per paycheck and I have an allowance of 400 per paycheck and we both work. |
You can't trust each other to simply buy what you need and discuss any wants together? We both work but I don't get the allowance thing unless one or both of you are serious spenders. |
I would actually give you a high-five - not because of the married man thing, but because of your financial savvy. Most young women in your position would opt for consumption, and blowing that money on rapidly depreciating assets (cars, clothes etc.). You actually had enough brains to put them into an appreciating asset - first, a bank account, then, your house! Good for you! |
| PS: and you aren't a whore. These were gifts. |
She seemed ambivalent before she did it. She's very bright and a people person. I think they intended to have more children and she had trouble staying pregnant between their two kids. I imagine she'll return to work when the younger one is in MS. |
I'll be honest and admit that this basically describes me and my friends and a lot of the women in my neighborhood and at our school. I also have several girlfriends living in Manhattan. I have never once heard anyone mention anything like a wife bonus ever. |
Is that really true? NY is not a community property state so assets are not automatically split 50/50. In such a state, wouldn't the SAHM be entitled to NOTHING? Because she didn't earn it herself. Husband takes all. |
We trust each other and we aren't serious spenders (if that weren't the case, the allowance system wouldn't stop it from being an issue because we can still spend joint money on stuff for the house, kids, etc.), it just makes life simpler. If I know I need $300 in new shoes for this summer because everything from past seasons is worn out, I don't need to run it by him, I can just decide to do it without having to explain/justify. It's not factor between us if I want to buy department store cosmetics instead of CVS brand or he wants to buy a new set of golf clubs to replace a perfectly serviceable set, even though we're also trying to save for a vacation or new living room furniture. We could work all of this out between ourselves without the allowance system, the allowance system just makes it easier. |
| Anyone else think maybe the overheard wives were being a little tongue in cheek and the author fell for it? |
+1 make things easier with my husband. |
No, that's not how it works at all. Common law property states don't presume 50/50 division of property the way community property states do, but lots of things will still be considered marital property unless it's clear the spouses intended for it all to be separate, and will be split equitably. If that paycheck goes into a joint bank account and pays the mortgage on a house titled in both spouses' names, that account and that house will be treated as marital property. |
Absolutely. When my husband gets his annual bonus, we each take a certain amount of it for our own use. Someone with certain biases in how they view SAHMs and the balance of power in marriages with SAHMs might see if as him giving me a "bonus," and I might even joke about it as such. But in reality, we don't view it that way, we view it as both sharing in the spoils, and we agree together to what extent we do that. |