Talking about Angelina Jolie and your theory, her biological kids are not that ugly. |
Regression to the mean: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_toward_the_mean#History |
| 100% for both |
|
I'm a woman
75 Body, 25 face |
PP from 11:53 here that said 75 body, 25 face. The part I bolded is why I put more emphasis on body I think. People can't help their face, but they can (for the most part) improve their body. Having a terrible body is usually the result of laziness and bad habits. |
She is really insanely, objectively beautiful. She could stand to gain some weight but her face is stunning. If we went by what most men find to be be beautiful then I guess Kim Kardashian and Pamela Anderson are the heights of beauty (LOL.) |
It's not about what men find sexy... you get that, right? Straight men dont define how women are measured. Objectively, the woman has a totally symmetrical face with beautiful almond eyes, full lips, a tiny nose, and insane cheekbones. Objectively, she fulfills all of our societal mandates for facial beauty. Her body shape is largely irrelevant.
|
\ Both ANgelina's parents were gorge..... John Voight was a self made movie star for a reason. And I disagree. I think the defining thing with whether you have ugly kids is reproduing with someone that doesnt have any real over the top, strong facial features. Oddlly enough, Demi Moore/Bruce Willis's kids would have been really gorgeous facially, if they had not inherited their father's ginormous chin. It worked on him because it's very masculine, but it looks atrocious on three young women. I am a hot lady myself and I have often wondered what I can do to assure my children will be attractive. What can I say? I grew up being stopped in stores by older people to tell me how cute and beautiful I was. I feel like a lot of what shaped me is based around the unique struggles of being overly attractive. Cant imagine a child who didnt have to deal with that particular journey. |
Yeah, but I guess I think people get into ruts and laziness isn't always heritable, but facial/bone structure always is. I basically care about the genes- I want good offspring for my kids, full stop, that is by far most important. A good body helps but a good face is a home run. I could never date someone seriously overweight but I would never mind a little cushion for the pushin if it meant I got to have kids with the facial equivalent of say, a Brad Pitt. |
| Women prefer 99% money |
| Face 70 Body 30. Male. |
I feel the same way. I've been married for 12 years. Honestly, I married her because she had an amazing ass. But 12 years later and I feel like I have a girlfriend, a wife and a best friend all wrapped into one. Also, we both came from poor and broken families. We put ourselves through undergrad and graduate school and have two great careers + a solid rental property business that we've built together. With that said, pure physical attraction for me is probably 80% body. |
True. We'll see how they look when they get older, but yes, so far they're cutie pies -- that's why I said there are no absolutes... |
| Keira Knightley insanely beautiful? Huh? |
"I don't get the attractiveness of the Keira Knightly figures, though. I just saw her in a movie again, and she has no breasts. Her teeth are not great, and she looks like she has an underbite. Her hair is fine, thin, scraggly looking. Sounds a lot like Audrey Hepburn.
|