Can anyone tell what is meant by "percent" here? Is it the average of the total score on the test? Is is the percentage of proficient students? Are they averaging reading and math scores? Pretty unclear writing -- but maybe that's part of the spin. |
We'll know more when the full numbers are released. My guess is some of those schools are not far below the Top 10 cutoff. Some will probably have "top 10" reading or math scores but not combined. There will be a lot of huffing and puffing about kids in the testing years and how this school or that school doesn't teach to the test like KIPP does. But, yeah, if you live and die by the DC CAS, the DCUM darling schools don't do as well as KIPP and Prep. |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's the percent of kids scoring either Proficient or Advanced. |
I think it must mean % who scored above "below basic"? |
Ugh, so annoying, just release the school-by-school data. |
It's important to note that the scores are spun from 2007 because the DC-CAS was relatively new (second year I think) and the scores had dipped.
While Rhee joined DCPS in 2007, students had already taken the 2007 test. This is spin from DCPS and OSSE. The scores across time should be judged from 2008, the first year of "Rhee-form." In other words, reading scores have remain largely stagnant for most of DCPS and math scores went up. However, when you think about the money, time, drama and cheating that's gone into the whole endeavor, it's pretty depressing. |
Glad to see one of these top ten schools advocate for all of the others in the Federal Court suit for equitable funding. |
However you wish to slice it, the scores have gone up. We all would have liked to have seen greater gains, but the movement is upward. I honestly don't understand why some people on this board are so intent on finding the negative. That too is spin. Signed, A DC Parent of three whose kids are getting a good education and who hopes that the upward trajectory continues. PS- What happened to all the people who don't care about the testing and the numbers? |
Don't you know? Test scores only matter if they validate what you already think about the school. ![]() |
Mundo Verde's students haven't reached testing age yet. |
Reading scores from black children went from 38.8 proficient in 2008 to 38.6 proficient in 2014.
Even with erase-to-the top that's shameful. Kaya should be fired and Rhee indicted. |
The movement has been incrementally upward for many years, incl those preceding Rhee-form. There was one year since then when scores actually went down, but they later continued at their usual snails pace. No one knows, or seems to care. |
Thanks. What excuse do the other charters have? Especially LAMB and Stokes--they have been around for at least a decade. And LAMB was even illegally cherry-picking its waitlist--I guess that still didn't' help. |
You of course are aware that some of these schools don't yet have the date to provide. CM is only in year two - so only had one year of scores to provide. IT will only have the their second year of scores this year. Perhaps before you insult a school - you get someone educated on how testing and charters work. |
CM hasn't reached testing age yet either. |