*I'M* with you.... |
I'm the PP whose post you quoted last. I am glad to hear you think I'm taking the right approach. The thing is, we cannot (and should not IMO) try to control our kids' spiritual lives. We can only lay the foundation and show them how we approach our own spiritual lives. My kids know that I pray, they know that I give thanks, they see and participate with me in religious observance. They understand why I value it, even as they say (from time to time) that they do not. Despite protests to the contrary, my older child is so interested in all things spiritual/religious that I would be surprised if he didn't participate in organized religion of some kind as an adult. I don't know that he will be a Christian (he says Judaism makes more sense to him) but I think he will practice *something*. He is very well-versed in religion generally. If he does choose to practice as an adult, I will feel I have done my job in terms of giving him familiarity and comfort with religious rituals, communities and practices, all of which have served my needs in so many ways during my life. You can't choose something from nothing. You can only choose it from some basis. My goal has been and is to give my kids that basis. The rest is up to them. |
Change this a little and see if it stands: "I want my children to love the violin. I want them to be faithful violin students and faithful violinists one day. I want this because I have very sincere dsire to play the violin that cause me to know that a strong interest in violin music has enriched my life in countless ways. I want them to be similarly enriched. So you may think it is weird that I want my kids to love the ciolin, but that is just a normal thing for people who truly feel that way. We want to share that feeling. That feeling brings us joy that we would never want to keep to ourselves." I bet if you exposed both your kids to the violin and one or neither of them wanted to continue playing, that you wouldn't force them. You might notice, sadly, that they didn't have an ear for it, and would look for another musical instrument for them or let them choose a non-musical pursuit that they had expressed an interest in. You wouldn't expect them to be just like each other or just like you when it came to talent for or love of the violin. |
I get where you're coming from - most parents want their children to grow and (mostly) follow in their footsteps, for various reasons. That's pretty natural. But I assure you, forcing faith on them or bringing it up regularly, will quite possibly have the opposite effect. Faith isn't something you can indoctrinate your children with. It's not something you can make them love. I honestly don't even think it's something you can teach - how many of us were taught to believe in religion/god by our parents or community, but still ended up not believing? Whatever happens, your kids will find their own way. Ultimately you have to admit that while your faith/religion/god brings YOU much joy, it cannot, will not, ever necessarily be something that will be joyful to others - even your kids. The joy that you find can never, will never be replicated for any other human being. Great happiness and joy are found in people of specific religions, general deists, agnostics and atheists. Even if you try, your experience can never be taught to someone else. There are many, many ways to immense, blissfully-content joy. With religion/god, and also without. Do you think that without religion or god, you children can be upstanding human beings? Do you believe they can be generous, kind, loving, supremely decent people even if they do not believe? I don't mean generous, kind, loving, and decent to a level of basic adequacy, but do you believe your children can be these things to the fullest extent, even without religion/god? These are the humanistic beliefs that should be your chief concern. If THEY decide to use religion/god as their vehicle, or to use their own hearts and minds as the vehicle, the end is the same. |
But that basis doesn't have to be modeling from your parents - it can be, but doesn't have to be. It could come from teachers, or friends or friends' parents, or the internet, etc. If could even be the eact opposite of what parents were modeling. Parents are important, but they don't control their children's natural proclivities. Anyone who was ever a kid once knows that. |
Statistically speaking, people who are raised with nothing in the way of religion continue with nothing as adults. They do not seek out organized religion, in general. OTOH, people who grow up with religion make choices as adults. They may choose atheism or be agnostics, but it is a choice and not a default. I never said that parents control their children's natural proclivities. In fact, I said the opposite. |
You seriously see no difference between the violin and a fundamental belief system? Yikes... |
you seriously don't see the similarities - Yikes. Please, please consider that a "fundamental belief system" is a choice or a talent or a natural proclivity, like so many other things in life. Why would it not be? The fact that so many people reject faith as adults or choose a faith different from the one they were rasied in is a major clue that this is so. |
I haven't seen that statistic -- can you cite a source? If that's so, it suggests that seeking a religion is not natural to a majority of people and that if fewer people were indoctrinated as children, fewer would be religious as adults. What we have now -- at least in the US -- is most people being indoctrinated as children, with some of them dropping religion as they get older. Some people do it quite easily. Others go through an immense amount of turmoil. Seems to me, it would be beter not to indoctrinate in the first place, assuming religion is natural and generally a good thing for people with a innate tendency toward it. |
|
I love this thread! So hypocritical. When an atheist or agnostic claims they don't want their kids partaking in any religious activity, the religious folks all come to say how unfair that is to the child, who should be allowed to make his/her own choices.
I guess when it is the opposite the child should not be allowed to make his/her own choices. How "interesting..." |
OP here-This is a very hyperbolic statement. I can't see any harm in teaching children about love, kindness and compassion. Three items that just so happen to be at the heart of Christianity. Why not immerse them in it? What's the worst that can happen? I'm not talking about force or coercion, but setting an example. Showing your kids that faith, and Gods love are all you really need in this world. That's sickening? |
|
Love, kindness and compassion are a feature of many different religions and also of humanism. "Immersion" in the form of seven-day-a-week indoctrination in a particular religion is not necessary. People obviously pick up love, kindness and compassion in many ways without immersion. I bet you could stop sending your kids to church right now and they'd still grow up being loving, kind and compassionate. Many people have accomplished it.
And let's face it - many religions and certainly Catholicism, teach that there is one superior way of understanding -- and that is through that one religion. The religion is teaching much more than love, kindness and compassion. It teaches an eternal afterfile in either heaven or hell. and that certain kinds of people can't marry or have the kind of sex that comes naturally to them because the god they believe in doesn't allow it. That's not part of teaching your kids to be loving, kind and compassionate. It's religious indocrination. And who's to say that" faith and god's love" are all they really need in life. That works for you, but is meaningless to a lot of people - inlcuding perhaps your kids, once they get old enough to think for themselves - which they will eventually do, despite your efforts to confine them in a Catholic cocoon. |
|
I am not Catholic and don't have kids. You're still thinking in terms of force. That will obviously never work. I wouldn't force children to do anything.
Forget all organized religions and just focus on love, kindness and compassion. Yeah, I could be a humanist, but where's the story? Where's the myth? Where's the magic? That can be found in the story of Christ. Why not use that a a vehicle? What's the worse that can happen? Nobody has answered that. save for "you're indoctrinating them." In what? What are you afraid of? How is teaching children about God hurting anybody? |
Just a reference point, but I'm the PP who grew up is a very religious household and who stopped believing as a child. During middle childhood and my teen years, I sounded a lot like your older kid. I knew a lot about religion, prayed constantly, actively participated in the church community, etc. My mom and religious teachers thought I was deeply religious and interested in religion. The truth was that I did not believe but had no language to even explain what it meant to not believe. I thought something was wrong with me, so I overcompensated in an attempt to force belief. I am not raising my children religious at all. I have offered to take them to my parents' church and they could go with my mom, but none have shown interest thus far. So far they've decided they're atheist as well, but we're careful to let them know it would be okay if they decided to believe in a god or gods, so long as they were kind about it. |
| Get behind mr, Satan. . .! |