Mitch McConnell taped scheming to paint Ashley Judd as "emotionally unstable"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Glad the wingnuts have something new to perseverate about. If felt bad because Benghazi ran out of steam for you, and no one talks about the gun walking program, so this is a good replacement for your outrage.

This could last months, esp. after the FBI concludes there was no crime. Then you can investigate how the WH influenced the investigation and start saying things like "how far does the conspiracy go?". Fun for everyone.

I think you are projecting. Who needs discourse when you have an alternative reality going on in your head complete with conclusions. You must be Theresa Caputo or another psychic. Glad you are enjoying yourself. Racism is only racism if it is against a Democrat? Illegally taping a conversation without the express consent of the parties isn't illegal unless it is a Republican committing the crime against a Democrat? Cool.

[Anonymous]

Sad that the Koolaid drinkers think that Benghazi is just a conservative conspiracy theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad the wingnuts have something new to perseverate about. If felt bad because Benghazi ran out of steam for you, and no one talks about the gun walking program, so this is a good replacement for your outrage.

This could last months, esp. after the FBI concludes there was no crime. Then you can investigate how the WH influenced the investigation and start saying things like "how far does the conspiracy go?". Fun for everyone.

I think you are projecting. Who needs discourse when you have an alternative reality going on in your head complete with conclusions. You must be Theresa Caputo or another psychic. Glad you are enjoying yourself. Racism is only racism if it is against a Democrat? Illegally taping a conversation without the express consent of the parties isn't illegal unless it is a Republican committing the crime against a Democrat? Cool.

Did I mention racism? And do you recall Linda Tripp?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are not amused. You are angry, but passive aggressive. It is a liberal tendency.

The ability to tell someone what they are really thinking is a typical conservative trait. That's how you know the gay people are really straight inside.

[Anonymous]

And do you recall Linda Tripp?

Oh, good! Let's talk Monica and Bill.......remember Hillary said that that story was only a "vast right wing conspiracy!" Right, Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And do you recall Linda Tripp?

Oh, good! Let's talk Monica and Bill.......remember Hillary said that that story was only a "vast right wing conspiracy!" Right, Hillary.

I don't think that really gets to the point of whether taping conversations is legal or not.

[Anonymous]

I don't think that really gets to the point of whether taping conversations is legal or not.

Is that the topic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad the wingnuts have something new to perseverate about. If felt bad because Benghazi ran out of steam for you, and no one talks about the gun walking program, so this is a good replacement for your outrage.

This could last months, esp. after the FBI concludes there was no crime. Then you can investigate how the WH influenced the investigation and start saying things like "how far does the conspiracy go?". Fun for everyone.

I think you are projecting. Who needs discourse when you have an alternative reality going on in your head complete with conclusions. You must be Theresa Caputo or another psychic. Glad you are enjoying yourself. Racism is only racism if it is against a Democrat? Illegally taping a conversation without the express consent of the parties isn't illegal unless it is a Republican committing the crime against a Democrat? Cool.

Did I mention racism? And do you recall Linda Tripp?

This entire thread is attacking Mitch McConnell's character when his wife's ethnicity was attacked last month. What, possibly could you have been referring to when you said Republicans needed something new to be outraged by? Clearly, racism and illegal wiretapping don't bother you. We know the public is not allowed to hear from the Benghazi survivors. The gun running program doesn't bother you as long as law enforcement agent is the one being murdered. Being a government employee seems more hazardous these days. Why aren't they protected equally?

Please do not ask me to recall Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp. I hope you didn't rally against something claiming it was unethical then chose to use it when it is opportune. Anyway, this is comparing apples and oranges. Dems will have a hard time saying McConnell's staff was wrong discussing her mental health when Dems want to use a person's mental health as a criteria for obtaining a gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad the wingnuts have something new to perseverate about. If felt bad because Benghazi ran out of steam for you, and no one talks about the gun walking program, so this is a good replacement for your outrage.

This could last months, esp. after the FBI concludes there was no crime. Then you can investigate how the WH influenced the investigation and start saying things like "how far does the conspiracy go?". Fun for everyone.

I think you are projecting. Who needs discourse when you have an alternative reality going on in your head complete with conclusions. You must be Theresa Caputo or another psychic. Glad you are enjoying yourself. Racism is only racism if it is against a Democrat? Illegally taping a conversation without the express consent of the parties isn't illegal unless it is a Republican committing the crime against a Democrat? Cool.

Did I mention racism? And do you recall Linda Tripp?

This entire thread is attacking Mitch McConnell's character when his wife's ethnicity was attacked last month. What, possibly could you have been referring to when you said Republicans needed something new to be outraged by? Clearly, racism and illegal wiretapping don't bother you. We know the public is not allowed to hear from the Benghazi survivors. The gun running program doesn't bother you as long as law enforcement agent is the one being murdered. Being a government employee seems more hazardous these days. Why aren't they protected equally?

Please do not ask me to recall Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp. I hope you didn't rally against something claiming it was unethical then chose to use it when it is opportune. Anyway, this is comparing apples and oranges. Dems will have a hard time saying McConnell's staff was wrong discussing her mental health when Dems want to use a person's mental health as a criteria for obtaining a gun.

On this board, the liberals condemned the attacks on McConnells wife. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/292582.page

Sorry but you struck a dry well on that one.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who thinks any campaign eschews conversations like this is naive. We were all pretty pissed off when Obama's bitter-cling-to-guns-and-religion thing was taped, weren't we? This wasn't a fundraiser; it was a private conversation. I'm surprised Corn used a tape acquired under these circumstances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad the wingnuts have something new to perseverate about. If felt bad because Benghazi ran out of steam for you, and no one talks about the gun walking program, so this is a good replacement for your outrage.

This could last months, esp. after the FBI concludes there was no crime. Then you can investigate how the WH influenced the investigation and start saying things like "how far does the conspiracy go?". Fun for everyone.

I think you are projecting. Who needs discourse when you have an alternative reality going on in your head complete with conclusions. You must be Theresa Caputo or another psychic. Glad you are enjoying yourself. Racism is only racism if it is against a Democrat? Illegally taping a conversation without the express consent of the parties isn't illegal unless it is a Republican committing the crime against a Democrat? Cool.

Did I mention racism? And do you recall Linda Tripp?

This entire thread is attacking Mitch McConnell's character when his wife's ethnicity was attacked last month. What, possibly could you have been referring to when you said Republicans needed something new to be outraged by? Clearly, racism and illegal wiretapping don't bother you. We know the public is not allowed to hear from the Benghazi survivors. The gun running program doesn't bother you as long as law enforcement agent is the one being murdered. Being a government employee seems more hazardous these days. Why aren't they protected equally?

Please do not ask me to recall Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp. I hope you didn't rally against something claiming it was unethical then chose to use it when it is opportune. Anyway, this is comparing apples and oranges. Dems will have a hard time saying McConnell's staff was wrong discussing her mental health when Dems want to use a person's mental health as a criteria for obtaining a gun.

On this board, the liberals condemned the attacks on McConnells wife. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/292582.page

Sorry but you struck a dry well on that one.

No he did not. Because libs condemned the attacks on McConnell's wife you don't get a pass on the other nastiness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad the wingnuts have something new to perseverate about. If felt bad because Benghazi ran out of steam for you, and no one talks about the gun walking program, so this is a good replacement for your outrage.

This could last months, esp. after the FBI concludes there was no crime. Then you can investigate how the WH influenced the investigation and start saying things like "how far does the conspiracy go?". Fun for everyone.

I think you are projecting. Who needs discourse when you have an alternative reality going on in your head complete with conclusions. You must be Theresa Caputo or another psychic. Glad you are enjoying yourself. Racism is only racism if it is against a Democrat? Illegally taping a conversation without the express consent of the parties isn't illegal unless it is a Republican committing the crime against a Democrat? Cool.

Did I mention racism? And do you recall Linda Tripp?

This entire thread is attacking Mitch McConnell's character when his wife's ethnicity was attacked last month. What, possibly could you have been referring to when you said Republicans needed something new to be outraged by? Clearly, racism and illegal wiretapping don't bother you. We know the public is not allowed to hear from the Benghazi survivors. The gun running program doesn't bother you as long as law enforcement agent is the one being murdered. Being a government employee seems more hazardous these days. Why aren't they protected equally?

Please do not ask me to recall Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp. I hope you didn't rally against something claiming it was unethical then chose to use it when it is opportune. Anyway, this is comparing apples and oranges. Dems will have a hard time saying McConnell's staff was wrong discussing her mental health when Dems want to use a person's mental health as a criteria for obtaining a gun.

On this board, the liberals condemned the attacks on McConnells wife. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/292582.page

Sorry but you struck a dry well on that one.

No he did not. Because libs condemned the attacks on McConnell's wife you don't get a pass on the other nastiness.

Well then to finish off his two accusations (1) racism, and (2) wiretapping, recording a conversation from the hallway is not wiretapping because it does not go through the telephone system.

There.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In addition, why the hell is this even inflammatory? Judd, as mentioned previously, was very open about her mental illness. I would certainly want to know the mental status of someone who was planning to take office.

Wasn't she a teenager when she considered suicide. And the suicide tendencies was a result of her beating herself up over the three rapes she endured.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In addition, why the hell is this even inflammatory? Judd, as mentioned previously, was very open about her mental illness. I would certainly want to know the mental status of someone who was planning to take office.

Wasn't she a teenager when she considered suicide. And the suicide tendencies was a result of her beating herself up over the three rapes she endured.

How does this change anything?

[Anonymous]

Well, the recording may not be wiretapping, but it is illegal to record private conversations in Kentucky.