Is anyone still undecided?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Umm - the 47% includes retirees and children, people who don't work and therefore pay no income tax, as well as the working poor and unemployed.

I wish I had the numbers of how much of the population those first two groups make up on their own so we could then talk about the others more intelligently. Even conservatives (read Peggy Noonan's WSJ column yesterday) think that number is a joke.

Children? Are you that dumb?

[Anonymous]

I'm undecided but leaning toward Romney. I can't take 4 more years of this crap and I think it's awful that Obama ate a dog.

[Anonymous]

Always described as the fat lady... Mr. Romney, I'm clearing my throat and preparing to sing after your faux pas of recent weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm undecided but leaning toward Romney. I can't take 4 more years of this crap and I think it's awful that Obama ate a dog.

Seriously? He was a little kid and someone fed it to him. You think that's a reason?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm undecided but leaning toward Romney. I can't take 4 more years of this crap and I think it's awful that Obama ate a dog.

Yes, yes. I think the 3-4 times you posted the same thing should be enough. We get it. No one else cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am. I'm registered as a Dem but have voted Republican in the past. I'm socially liberal - pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, etc. I'm also for the death penalty, believe in a strong and active military, and think the government is too involved in people's day-to-day lives.

I'm frustrated with the lack of change and the excuses being made by team Obama, but some of Romney's comments disgust me (though my conservative husband claims they're taken out of context.)

Those undecided, how are you feeling?

I feel exactly the way you do. I guess it's a question of degrees of importance. I attach a high level of importance to pro-choice. I think that under the Dems we've had a strong and active military and I've been surprised at how well Obama (and Hillary) have done on international affairs. I agree that govt is too involved in our lives; I am most worried about Patriot Act type suspension of constitutional rights. Which I think will be bad whomever wins.

I think we've had a problem in this country for a long time now with the concentration of wealth in the hands of an elite. I don't think society can sustain that without, frankly, ending up with severe civil unrest. Which would undermine my nice cozy six figures and house in the burbs of FFX. It's in my best interest to make sure people don't starve because they are unemployed or disabled or too old to work. I think that the Romney committment to cutting taxes for the rich and cutting programs for everyone else will exacerbate this problem.

I feel that I don't really like either candidate but Obama is the lesser evil. "Kick the can down the road" re: Palestine and Israel indeed.

Exactly. Am I the only one who sees a similarity between Romney and Marie Antoinette? That didn't work out so well.

To paraphrase: "I like paying taxes. With it, I buy civilization."

[Anonymous]

At times I have figured that no matter what he says to toady up to the tea party and to his fellow millionaires, I figured that when it comes down to it, Romney is a problem-solver who might (I was never confident enough to say would) actually buckle down and do the job reasonably well. But the post-assassination news conference, when he refused to adhere to the tradition of keeping politics from interfering with foreign policy, was a step too far.

I won't claim that I ever planned to vote for him, but I am now scared of the idea of him as president.

[Anonymous]

Me. I am convinced that Obama cannot fix the economy. If Romney presented himself the way he was as a governor, we would have a viable choice instead of a sham election.

[Anonymous]

20:26, that's the problem. Romney has revealed who he is and it is one of an array of personas depending on the audience. That may work well in the theatre, but not always in politics.

Would appreciate knowing what you think the president should have done differently when the banks were on the verge of collapse and the nation was shedding a half million jobs a month.

[Anonymous]

Seeing what the president's priorities were after the Libya ambassador died sealed a big NOBAMA for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:20:26, that's the problem. Romney has revealed who he is and it is one of an array of personas depending on the audience. That may work well in the theatre, but not always in politics.

Would appreciate knowing what you think the president should have done differently when the banks were on the verge of collapse and the nation was shedding a half million jobs a month.

I would have prosecuted those responsible for this mess because by giving everyone a free pass, there is still a lack of confidence in the banking system. Also, the stimulus should have been geared more towards infrastructure.

[Anonymous]

PP, the GOP barely agreed to the stimulus plan as it was. Not clear they would've embraced a larger plan. Regarding the lack of prosecutions, I am disappointed, yet I have zero confidence that Romney would have acquited himself any better.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Seeing what the president's priorities were after the Libya ambassador died sealed a big NOBAMA for me.

You posted roughly the same thing earlier in the thread and have posted the same thing in several other threads. Exactly what do you think Obama should have been doing in aftermath of the death of the ambassador?

[Anonymous]

well, duh - CLEARLY he should have been thumping his chest and bombing the shit out of someone while smirking about it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20:26, that's the problem. Romney has revealed who he is and it is one of an array of personas depending on the audience. That may work well in the theatre, but not always in politics.

Would appreciate knowing what you think the president should have done differently when the banks were on the verge of collapse and the nation was shedding a half million jobs a month.

I would have prosecuted those responsible for this mess because by giving everyone a free pass, there is still a lack of confidence in the banking system. Also, the stimulus should have been geared more towards infrastructure.

That's interesting. So you would have prosecuted Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and all the other congressmen who were bought off by the GSE's and the sub-prime housing industry? Yes, of course I know you can't jail congressmen for legalized corruption but it's a pleasant fantasy.