Accelerated Education in MCPS - Do you care?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ok, i see that some of you are typing responses faster than the clock speed. so here is a request. whether you agree with GTA or not you are obviously very invested in the changes in GT education, so will you please go to http://www.gtamc.org/2012-gt-forum and provide your comment before 5pm today, even if you want to convey "GT in MCPS should only refer to magnet ready kids" or "GT is everyone above xyz %tile"... you can certainly qualify your statement with "I am not a member of GTA, but I care about GT" if you want.

Or, you can be really smart and email your comments directly to:

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

You can find all these email addresses on the MCPS website. By doing so you will be showing them you are a real person with real kids IN THE MCPS system. You won't be dismissed as a phantom parent recruited by the GTA. Stand up on your own feet and avoid organizations with their own agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ok, i see that some of you are typing responses faster than the clock speed. so here is a request. whether you agree with GTA or not you are obviously very invested in the changes in GT education, so will you please go to http://www.gtamc.org/2012-gt-forum and provide your comment before 5pm today, even if you want to convey "GT in MCPS should only refer to magnet ready kids" or "GT is everyone above xyz %tile"... you can certainly qualify your statement with "I am not a member of GTA, but I care about GT" if you want.

Or, you can be really smart and email your comments directly to:

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

You can find all these email addresses on the MCPS website. By doing so you will be showing them you are a real person with real kids IN THE MCPS system. You won't be dismissed as a phantom parent recruited by the GTA. Stand up on your own feet and avoid organizations with their own agenda.

Looks like this smart person has not learned the power in standing united.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

There is another explanation. Because of parental pressure MCPS looks at students who come well prepared from the eastern and western parts and lumps them in with GT. It creates a huge group--especially in schools located in wealthy areas. These kids do get to take William and Mary and math at a higher level. Many of us on the eastern side agree with the MCEF that this is NOT right. The GTA says challenge every child--then why don't they support differentiated education?

thank you!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ok, i see that some of you are typing responses faster than the clock speed. so here is a request. whether you agree with GTA or not you are obviously very invested in the changes in GT education, so will you please go to http://www.gtamc.org/2012-gt-forum and provide your comment before 5pm today, even if you want to convey "GT in MCPS should only refer to magnet ready kids" or "GT is everyone above xyz %tile"... you can certainly qualify your statement with "I am not a member of GTA, but I care about GT" if you want.

Or, you can be really smart and email your comments directly to:

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

You can find all these email addresses on the MCPS website. By doing so you will be showing them you are a real person with real kids IN THE MCPS system. You won't be dismissed as a phantom parent recruited by the GTA. Stand up on your own feet and avoid organizations with their own agenda.

Looks like this smart person has not learned the power in standing united.

With snide comments you only show you are a weak leader. How can anyone unite behind an organization that isn't inclusive or honest? So far the GTA folks have shown they can attack our Superintendent, denigrate teachers, and go after parents. No, I am not united with the GTA. I supported you under a previous leadership.

[Anonymous]

16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

I just read through the stuff on your email list. I know you guys just want to label your kids and feel superior. Do you honestly think that everyone in MoCo is dumb enough to believe your saying you just want the label to advocate for ability grouping? Get real GTA, we know your game. Remember how you guys claimed you called MCPS and they said HGCs won't be discussed tomorrow? You got called on it and had to admit it was WRONG. Why be anonymous and go around posting everywhere if you have a honest purpose?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

there is just one group that keeps quoting the IOA policy--the GTA. Will you agree to stop asking MCPS to label your kids GT if we support your effort to get grouping???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

I agree with it too, this person seems to have an agenda to bash GTA without any evidence of the group doing anything that he/she accuses GTA of. When he attacks others it is totally fine, when others challenge him in his own game, they are attacking and they must be GTA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

I agree with it too, this person seems to have an agenda to bash GTA without any evidence of the group doing anything that he/she accuses GTA of. When he attacks others it is totally fine, when others challenge him in his own game, they are attacking and they must be GTA

It seems like the GTA has a beef with someone. Take it off this forum folks.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

[/quote]

I agree with it too, this person seems to have an agenda to bash GTA without any evidence of the group doing anything that he/she accuses GTA of. When he attacks others it is totally fine, when others challenge him in his own game, they are attacking and they must be GTA [/quote]

It seems like the GTA has a beef with someone. Take it off this forum folks. [/quote]

Why is the GTA posting anonymously?

[Anonymous]

This person who's posting is not an official of GTA. I can figure out who it is from the style of writing. I don't believe any GTA officers are posting on these threads, other than maybe to originally announce the superintendant's forum.

[Anonymous]

I've posted a lot on this thread. I'm the pp quoted above w/ a preschooler DD. Frankly I think at this point the poster insisting that "GTA is posting - I know it's you!!" is just trying to stir the pot since I and most of the others above concerned about this issue have stated clearly that we've gone on the GTA site and agree w/ the Challenge Every Child proposal but are not actually part of GTA.

"there is just one group that keeps quoting the IOA policy--the GTA. Will you agree to stop asking MCPS to label your kids GT if we support your effort to get grouping??? "

I do not care at all how DD is labeled so long as she is allowed to learn w/ a peer group and not held back by the teacher having to spend most of her time focusing on the much larger amt of the class that is likely to be below grade level (given the stats for my local east- county school). But if the only way to try to push for that at this point is thru the "hook" of GI, then that's what I'm happy to use. Not because I think DD is truly "gifted", but because I want her to be able to learn at her own pace - whatever the is - not at whatever pace the majority of her class happens to be at.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

there is just one group that keeps quoting the IOA policy--the GTA. Will you agree to stop asking MCPS to label your kids GT if we support your effort to get grouping???

I quoted IOA, not because I am from, but because I helped a friend in appealing a magnet selection decision. Should not GTA know and quote IOA if they are advocating to MCPS to provide the service documented in MCPS policies? Is it wrong to expect a public organization to follow its own policy? BTW, I promise I will stop using the label for my kids if your group (since you said "we") can get us the ability grouping in local schools. Now can you identify your organization?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14 - you have posted nothing to back up the attack comments. Certainly no posters here have bashed the Superintendent or teachers. That is unless you count the very obvious statements of doubt that teachers can effectively teach to classroom of very widely varying ability levels. I don't view that as bashing though - instead it's a recognition of the challenge in that. If some in GTA (individual people are different from an entire organization, by tthe way) have done so in the past, I have gotten the impression from these threads that attacks on the Superintendent might be because he has not effectively required each school to actually abide by the county's GT policy (http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ioa.pdf) which is actually quite good but from what I hear (DD is a preschooler) is not actually implemented in many schools, plus there seem to be attempts to shift away entirely from this approach. I am sure there are SOME other parents on the east side that don't think ability groupin gis good, but I think most of us agree that it is the best way to address the needs of kids who show up at school with very very different levels of readiness.

there is just one group that keeps quoting the IOA policy--the GTA. Will you agree to stop asking MCPS to label your kids GT if we support your effort to get grouping???

I quoted IOA, not because I am from, but because I helped a friend in appealing a magnet selection decision. Should not GTA know and quote IOA if they are advocating to MCPS to provide the service documented in MCPS policies? Is it wrong to expect a public organization to follow its own policy? BTW, I promise I will stop using the label for my kids if your group (since you said "we") can get us the ability grouping in local schools. Now can you identify your organization?

meant to say "not because I am from GTA"

[Anonymous]

If you are planning to go to the meeting MCPS Superintendent's Gifted Education Forum tomorrow at 7pm in Magruder High School, please plan to wear something "Green" to support "Gifted Education.