Please, do not cite college transitions rankings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue is not everyone uses LinkedIn. I know, for one, that I wouldn't be listed, as a recent grad from Harvard law, in these rankings' datapoints, because LinkedIn serves no purpose in my professional career. Do not use these rankings.

This seems much like saying "I wasn't polled, therefore the survey is invalid." This would represent the case with whichever law school you attended. That said, I'm not even sure where people are seeing College Transitions feeder lists through DCUM.

+1. And I, as another HLS grad, DO use linked In as does every else in my class!

Also, so many undergraduates establish LinkedIn profiles that it would seem natural for them to continue updates through and beyond law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

+1
That poster always shows up to plug a certain school using that site. It's comical.

Agree. Clueless and comical.

Self reflection

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

+1
That poster always shows up to plug a certain school using that site. It's comical.

Agree. Clueless and comical.

Self reflection

+1. Also known as accusations in the mirror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

+1
That poster always shows up to plug a certain school using that site. It's comical.

This suggests an advantage of a public source. The information remains the same regardless of who posts it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

For those who haven't taken the time to read this earlier topic, the OP sought "comparable schools in selectivity . . . to Wake and W&M." A reply then offered a link to a College Transitions site in which selective college are grouped by rough equivalence in difficulty of admission. People can judge for themselves whether or not the reply was silly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:College transitions uses Linkedin data for its outcome rankings. These are based on self reported Linkedin profiles, they are not reliable. Please stop the excessive usage of college transitions rankings in your posts.

You're the same poster who recently misrepresented themself as the OP in a reply in another thread, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

You sure showed them. lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My issue with college transitions is not really the website itself. It’s that a bot keeps posting college transitions and google share links over and over again in this site with no context and little applicability to the situation. When someone just plops a source and makes no point, it’s a struggle to take it seriously.

Definitely a struggle to take this post seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

For those who haven't taken the time to read this earlier topic, the OP sought "comparable schools in selectivity . . . to Wake and W&M." A reply then offered a link to a College Transitions site in which selective college are grouped by rough equivalence in difficulty of admission. People can judge for themselves whether or not the reply was silly.

People should do more of their own factual investigations from resources like the Common Dara Sets and federal data. There is a lot of misinformation on random websites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread. Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.

For those who haven't taken the time to read this earlier topic, the OP sought "comparable schools in selectivity . . . to Wake and W&M." A reply then offered a link to a College Transitions site in which selective college are grouped by rough equivalence in difficulty of admission. People can judge for themselves whether or not the reply was silly.

People should do more of their own factual investigations from resources like the Common Dara Sets and federal data. There is a lot of misinformation on random websites.

lol every college ranking cited on this forum citied to suggest a fictitious "Top 10" or "Top 20" is the most laughable thing ever. But actual Linkedin data as to where graduates are employed is misinformation. Lol ok cool.

[Anonymous]

Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

Once again stop being a bad poster

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

What is your issue with college transition? Did you get let go? You are really over the top.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Once again, please stop posting college transition rankings. You are misleading a lot of people.

+1