Reply to Please, do not cite college transitions rankings

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Please, do not cite college transitions rankings "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For those interested in context, it seems this represents the type of post to which the OP objects, particularly based on the timing of the creation of this thread:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1327021.page[/quote]

I now see how silly it is to inject the college transitions in that thread.  Anyway, this poster has stopped posting college transitions.  [/quote]
For those who haven't taken the time to read this earlier topic, the OP sought  "comparable schools in selectivity . . . to Wake and W&M." A reply then offered a link to a College Transitions  site in which selective college are grouped by rough equivalence in difficulty of admission. People can judge for themselves whether or not the reply was silly.[/quote]

People should do more of their own factual investigations from resources like the Common Dara Sets and federal data.  There is a lot of misinformation on random websites.[/quote]

lol every college ranking cited on this forum citied to suggest a fictitious "Top 10" or "Top 20" is the most laughable thing ever.  But actual Linkedin data as to where graduates are employed is misinformation. Lol ok cool.    [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics