Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow! Unbelievable. The investigation on who knew what and when will be very telling.
I’m sure no one at the school knew anything. They wouldn’t protect this guy.
I’m more worried about whether there are now videos of my daughter circulating on the dark web. Hopefully he wasn’t selling the videos or posting them.
I would not be so confident about that.
Enough with the conspiracy theories. Kids reported it, and it was dealt with. The play is going on now, so it must have been fairly recent. I'm wondering where the abuse charge comes from. Wouldn't it normally be an exploitation charge if all he had were videos of kids changing?
I’m not aware of any Maryland law that defines or prohibits “exploitation” separately from abuse. There is a MD published appellate case saying that filming a minor changing after getting out of the shower is sex abuse of a minor even if there’s were no contact sex offenses. Very similar situation.
I think the PP was talking about a child pornography charge. Maryland does have a statute criminalizing possession of these materials, but I’m skeptical about its application here.
Yeah, I’m not sure that videos of kids changing clothes would be considered pornography. No sex acts and possibly not even nudity of private parts. It’s a violation for sure. It’s creepy/icky. But it’s not necessarily pornography.
The sex abuse of a minor case with the filming of a child changing after showering is pretty on point though. And sex abuse of a minor is a very serious felony.