DOJ releases Trump Epstein sexual abuse allegations; dont let them bury this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

"A DOJ source told the Miami Herald that agents found her to be credible – and that they would not have interviewed her 4X if they thought she was lying"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

You know what?
I don’t give a damn. The whole E Jean Carroll trial was a farce and nothing more than an attempt to prevent Trump from becoming president again. You see how well that worked.
And the reality is a lot of powerful people were friends with Epstein. Not all of them called the Palm Beach police to report on Epstein and Maxwell. And many of them (Clintons) remained friends with Maxwell after the truth came out. And then there is Stacey Plaskett who not only took campaign contributions from Epstein, but communicated with him during a hearing to try to take down Trump.

So. I don’t care what you try to throw at him. We know better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

You know what?
I don’t give a damn. The whole E Jean Carroll trial was a farce and nothing more than an attempt to prevent Trump from becoming president again. You see how well that worked.
And the reality is a lot of powerful people were friends with Epstein. Not all of them called the Palm Beach police to report on Epstein and Maxwell. And many of them (Clintons) remained friends with Maxwell after the truth came out. And then there is Stacey Plaskett who not only took campaign contributions from Epstein, but communicated with him during a hearing to try to take down Trump.

So. I don’t care what you try to throw at him. We know better.

You're the one that has to live with yourself. So carry on...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

"A DOJ source told the Miami Herald that agents found her to be credible – and that they would not have interviewed her 4X if they thought she was lying"

Who is this DOJ source? Anonymous? Why not go on the record?

And …”In the end, she declined to cooperate with their investigation, and they lost touch with her.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don Lemon:

A woman describes being introduced to Trump by Epstein at age 13-15.

Trump cleared the room. Said “let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be.”

She fought back. He struck her.

She told the FBI she heard Trump and Epstein discuss the blackmail operation together.

She asked agents to keep her safe: “Throughout my life his people have found me. Have kept tabs on me.”

A war started the week these files dropped…

And you believe this. SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

You know what?
I don’t give a damn. The whole E Jean Carroll trial was a farce and nothing more than an attempt to prevent Trump from becoming president again. You see how well that worked.
And the reality is a lot of powerful people were friends with Epstein. Not all of them called the Palm Beach police to report on Epstein and Maxwell. And many of them (Clintons) remained friends with Maxwell after the truth came out. And then there is Stacey Plaskett who not only took campaign contributions from Epstein, but communicated with him during a hearing to try to take down Trump.

So. I don’t care what you try to throw at him. We know better.

I bet you did not believe the women in the Bill Cosby and Weinstein cases either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Proof please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

You know what?
I don’t give a damn. The whole E Jean Carroll trial was a farce and nothing more than an attempt to prevent Trump from becoming president again. You see how well that worked.
And the reality is a lot of powerful people were friends with Epstein. Not all of them called the Palm Beach police to report on Epstein and Maxwell. And many of them (Clintons) remained friends with Maxwell after the truth came out. And then there is Stacey Plaskett who not only took campaign contributions from Epstein, but communicated with him during a hearing to try to take down Trump.

So. I don’t care what you try to throw at him. We know better.

MAGA and its relationship with the rule of law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don Lemon:

A woman describes being introduced to Trump by Epstein at age 13-15.

Trump cleared the room. Said “let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be.”

She fought back. He struck her.

She told the FBI she heard Trump and Epstein discuss the blackmail operation together.

She asked agents to keep her safe: “Throughout my life his people have found me. Have kept tabs on me.”

A war started the week these files dropped…

And you believe this. SMH.

If it is a choice between her story and the guy who can't articulate a sentence without lying, I think the choice is obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Biden's DOJ was investigating all of this and Trump killed the investigations. Where do you get the idea that Biden's DOJ "dismissed" these allegations?

The investigation under Biden is the reason his DOJ didn't release the files. Now that Trump ended the investigations, why hasn't he released the files as he promised during his campaign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are barely talking about this any more. I really hope Trump's Wag the Dog doesn't work, but so far it is knocking Epstein off the radar.

That is because people with an iota of critical thinking know that it is an absurd allegation and was dismissed by Biden’s DOJ.
Of course the people here believe this claim because they are not among those with critical thinking.

Do you have any reporting showing that this was dismissed by the DOJ? I had not heard that.

As for the absurdity of the allegation, I don't really see why. He is not exactly known for taking consent seriously (per his own words), and has been credibly accused by more than one person of sexual assault.

First of all.... this is not new. This information was released months ago. This image is from an X post dated back to January....
https://x.com/scott_46gsmer/status/2017693506102239434



This story is the same as the first entry on this image.

Secondly, if they had considered this claim credible, they would have certainly dug deeper.

This information was available to the Biden administration for 4 years. They did nothing with it. Because it is total nonsense.
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

The caller recounted that a friend of hers had told her about the assault. The FBI has apparently interviewed this friend (the one who was assaulted) multiple times and found her credible. The notation about criminal history is about the caller, not the assault victim who is or was her friend.

Where is your source for this statement?

Actual interviews with the victim:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123

There is nothing in either of those links indicating the FBI found her credible. In fact her interview on the FBI 302 makes her sound a bit crazy.

And Trump's been convicted of sexual assault and was best friends with Epstein for an extended period of time. What's that make Trump sound like?

You know what?
I don’t give a damn. The whole E Jean Carroll trial was a farce and nothing more than an attempt to prevent Trump from becoming president again. You see how well that worked.
And the reality is a lot of powerful people were friends with Epstein. Not all of them called the Palm Beach police to report on Epstein and Maxwell. And many of them (Clintons) remained friends with Maxwell after the truth came out. And then there is Stacey Plaskett who not only took campaign contributions from Epstein, but communicated with him during a hearing to try to take down Trump.

So. I don’t care what you try to throw at him. We know better.

No one cares how deep you are in denial. Everyone will just keep exposing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

+ a million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

False allegations? You mean like what was written in his yearbook that Kavanaugh said under oath meant, "Did you fart yet?" instead of performing a sexual act? That was clearly a stupid lie, the kind of lie that makes you roll your eyes when one of your kids stoops to that level of ineptitude at being dishonest. So he's clearly a liar. A man who clearly lied under oath is now a supreme court justice. Don't bring up the name Kavanaugh ever again unless you are willing to admit that. He will go down in history as someone who lied under oath to get the job. What a farce Trump has made of every branch of our government.

DP. Here we go again. The people who thought it would be a great idea to use Kavanaugh’s HIGH SCHOOL yearbook as evidence of… something… are now believing a the fabrications of a mentally disturbed person. How typical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

Ah yes, the resident pedo apologist. I believe the victims.

So you believe Biden’s accuser?

When did Biden brag about being able to grab women? I must’ve missed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, it seems the woman making the claim has a criminal history. The woman is clearly disturbed.

Being forced to perform oral sex on an adult at age 13 is probably not great for mental health. You have no knowledge one way or the other so why debase yourself by defending it?

IT DIDN’T HAPPEN!!!
This is like all the false outrageous allegations trotted out by the left during the Kavanaugh hearings. You can only cry wolf so many times.

Ah yes, the resident pedo apologist. I believe the victims.

So you believe Biden’s accuser?

You people are the only ones who continually try to "get us" by bringing up Democrats who might be implicated in crimes as if we are protecting them. That's why we think you're evil. Because we continue to say over and over and over again that if this means that prominent Democrats get charged and convicted, SO BE IT. You will NEVER get me to say that we should protect Clinton, or Gates or whoever else might be implicated. Biden is not in the files and if he were, I would want him investigated too.