| I’ve read and used the waiver. The waiver does not say that it is for private schools only. |
| It’s quite obvious that someone’s kid isn’t good enough to score goals on his MLS Next team so he has to stroke his ego by scoring a goal against his crosstown rivals. |
He's the Goalie |
Your kid's public school signed the waiver? |
|
Tell the MLS people to eat a D.
Go play have fun. |
| MLS fines club if your kid plays HS |
they will fine the club. You can only play if your kid goes to private school. |
|
Yes the waiver is meant for kids going to private schools. Reasoning is some receive
Scholarships to play https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/resources/conduct/mls-next-fine-schedule |
| The waiver can be interpreted in many ways. In no situation is the waiver only for private schools. |
The waiver is limited to players who fit one of two categories: 1. Received financial aid for high school soccer participation 2. Accepted into a high school based on soccer participation Please let us know how either of these would apply to a public school. |
I'll correct myself here: there is an "other" option that I'm glossing over. Are you saying that the league allows "other" for public school kids? |
As a club coach and former high school coach. I can tell you there is some very good high school boys soccer, not every team. But last years McLean, Westfield and Herndon are beat every MLS next team U17 in the area. And for a young player there can be significant benefit of playing high school. Is every team good, absolutely not. For girls soccer there is no reason for any top girls player to play except maybe the liberty district. |
I have never heard of a player being fined |
Lol. You shouldn't have even dignified that asinine assumption with a response but I'm glad you did. PP with all your unfounded "obvious" observations. Why do you care so much? I hope you aren't putting all your eggs in this alleged "pro pathway" foolishness. |
In which competition did the HS teams play against the MLS Next teams? |