What Have You Learned from the Epstein Files? (Protecting Our Children)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't vote for GOP/MAGA ever again since they clearly don't care about pedophiles and trafficking.

And, before anyone comes at me, not a single GOP/MAGA asked Bondi one thing about the Epstein files at the hearing. NOT A SINGLE ONE.

Ergo, this party condones child abuse.

Do you have the same concern about all the human trafficking across the border under Biden? A whole lot more of poor kids than were trafficked by Epstein in his dreams.

So are you saying that the GOP only cares about human trafficking during a Dem presidency? Is that really where you want to go here? They didn't care yesterday. You don't care that there are serious allegations of our POTUS raping children?

You're trash.

Not pp. Don't let them divide us. Yes, there were many GOP lawmakers in the files but there were also the tech bros, and people like Dershowitz, Chomsky, and Summers. This is not a political party issue. This is an elites issue and we need to get them all out of power, if not the country. This is coming from an independent who despises the Clintons (as well as the Chumps) yet vehemently disagrees that they should be first (or second, or third) up in any Congressional inquiry on the Epstein Files. This shouldn't be some psyops propaganda circus. If they are guilty they should be punished. But maybe they're not. The only way to find out is by first targeting the low hanging fruit and getting them to turn and provide evidence. Systematically. With an independent special prosecutor or ten. In the meantime, everyone named in the Files should be removed from public office or fired from any companies they're employed at. Forcefully, if needed.

My comment is not dividing us. Such a weird take.

I'm laying out facts. Every Dem in Congress and a single GOP asked questions relevant to the case at yesterday's hearing. Every single other GOP/MAGA talked to Bondi about immigration and the stock market, which aren't in her purview.

My original statement, to which PP made a gross whataboutism, was that pedophilia is now apparently (grossly!) political.

Thus, I said to not vote for another GOP/MAGA again. Why? Because if you care about bringing down the system, learning the truth about this network and whatever Dems and GOP did, then YOU NEED TO KEEP VOTING FOR DEMS.

I'm not sure why this needs to be explained. I never said anything about the perpetrators, only who was responsible for the coverup.

The Democrats are no better. It's a uniparty. I don't hear the Democrats en masse calling for various non-GOP figures to be toppled and arrested. Both sides are grandstanding and they need to all be cut loose. Which Democrats have done a +1 to Khanna and Massie? Why is it always only one of these two having to defend the release of the Files. Why has MTG's name been scrubbed from the discourse now that she's no longer in Congress? The Democrats are just as complicit as the Republicans. Seriously. Name one Democrat not named Khanna that has staked their career (and life) on the issue from the outset. Which Democrat is reciting, on the floor of Congress, the names of conspirators that are in the redacted part of the Files? All members of Congress not named Khanna or Massie need to be voted out, and MTG should be able to reclaim her seat (which is a heavily partisan and basically uncontested district anyway) if she wants, after the dust has settled.

This is just willfully ignorant. You clearly didn't watch the hearings and all the Dems with their receipts. So many Dems on social media talking about seeing the unredacted files, and organizing in committees to search for specific info. Rep Stansbury has been on TV, and I'm sure others (but I have to turn it off because it's so disturbing).

Also, I'm not sure why there needs to be more than two leads on the files. The country is falling apart because of this corrupt, pedophilia-loving administration.

Lawmakers will only name names on the floor of Congress because of the Speech or Debate Clause. MTG was supposed to do this until she was presumably threatened with her life. Funny how they always go after the women because, as mothers, they have so much more to lose. So show me the vids of legislators naming names. I assure you the list is very short.

Also, keep your claims fluid because Bill and Hillary are on the docket. And if you haven't heard, two things have strangely happened since the CLinton agreed to show up. Bill has asked for the entire Epstein Files to be opened. And Chump has decided that Bill is once again his buddy now. You actually think the Democrats are going to throw a flamethrower at the Clintons?

Such a weird flex that you want them to just name names. A bunch of names doesn't tell us much. This phony drip drip doesn't tell us much. But, you won't be convinced that the Dems are just as much to blame, so we're done here.

[Anonymous]

p.s. yes, I absolutely think today's Dem party doesn't care much about the Clintons, btw. But, the GOP/MAGA does very much care about Trump, Bannon, Vance et al.

[Anonymous]

My takeaway is not to admire and aspire to the glitterati and upper most echelons of power. There is a level of wealth that is gross and always ties back to some level of exploitation. And with it often comes a feeling that the rules no longer apply as seen in royal families and the behavior of some politicians, power brokers, and celebrities.

We are normal level wealthy through great educations without loans and luck with regular w2 jobs, and through work, private schools and social connections have opportunities to rub shoulders with famous names, some of them already cancelled. I already felt this way but the Epstein files reaffirmed that we want to keep our heads down, live in the regular world and stay away from the private jet set. My kids agree that happiness is found in the real world and not the flashy and glossy one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't vote for GOP/MAGA ever again since they clearly don't care about pedophiles and trafficking.

And, before anyone comes at me, not a single GOP/MAGA asked Bondi one thing about the Epstein files at the hearing. NOT A SINGLE ONE.

Ergo, this party condones child abuse.

Do you have the same concern about all the human trafficking across the border under Biden? A whole lot more of poor kids than were trafficked by Epstein in his dreams.

So are you saying that the GOP only cares about human trafficking during a Dem presidency? Is that really where you want to go here? They didn't care yesterday. You don't care that there are serious allegations of our POTUS raping children?

You're trash.

Not pp. Don't let them divide us. Yes, there were many GOP lawmakers in the files but there were also the tech bros, and people like Dershowitz, Chomsky, and Summers. This is not a political party issue. This is an elites issue and we need to get them all out of power, if not the country. This is coming from an independent who despises the Clintons (as well as the Chumps) yet vehemently disagrees that they should be first (or second, or third) up in any Congressional inquiry on the Epstein Files. This shouldn't be some psyops propaganda circus. If they are guilty they should be punished. But maybe they're not. The only way to find out is by first targeting the low hanging fruit and getting them to turn and provide evidence. Systematically. With an independent special prosecutor or ten. In the meantime, everyone named in the Files should be removed from public office or fired from any companies they're employed at. Forcefully, if needed.

My comment is not dividing us. Such a weird take.

I'm laying out facts. Every Dem in Congress and a single GOP asked questions relevant to the case at yesterday's hearing. Every single other GOP/MAGA talked to Bondi about immigration and the stock market, which aren't in her purview.

My original statement, to which PP made a gross whataboutism, was that pedophilia is now apparently (grossly!) political.

Thus, I said to not vote for another GOP/MAGA again. Why? Because if you care about bringing down the system, learning the truth about this network and whatever Dems and GOP did, then YOU NEED TO KEEP VOTING FOR DEMS.

I'm not sure why this needs to be explained. I never said anything about the perpetrators, only who was responsible for the coverup.

The Democrats are no better. It's a uniparty. I don't hear the Democrats en masse calling for various non-GOP figures to be toppled and arrested. Both sides are grandstanding and they need to all be cut loose. Which Democrats have done a +1 to Khanna and Massie? Why is it always only one of these two having to defend the release of the Files. Why has MTG's name been scrubbed from the discourse now that she's no longer in Congress? The Democrats are just as complicit as the Republicans. Seriously. Name one Democrat not named Khanna that has staked their career (and life) on the issue from the outset. Which Democrat is reciting, on the floor of Congress, the names of conspirators that are in the redacted part of the Files? All members of Congress not named Khanna or Massie need to be voted out, and MTG should be able to reclaim her seat (which is a heavily partisan and basically uncontested district anyway) if she wants, after the dust has settled.

This is just willfully ignorant. You clearly didn't watch the hearings and all the Dems with their receipts. So many Dems on social media talking about seeing the unredacted files, and organizing in committees to search for specific info. Rep Stansbury has been on TV, and I'm sure others (but I have to turn it off because it's so disturbing).

Also, I'm not sure why there needs to be more than two leads on the files. The country is falling apart because of this corrupt, pedophilia-loving administration.

Lawmakers will only name names on the floor of Congress because of the Speech or Debate Clause. MTG was supposed to do this until she was presumably threatened with her life. Funny how they always go after the women because, as mothers, they have so much more to lose. So show me the vids of legislators naming names. I assure you the list is very short.

Also, keep your claims fluid because Bill and Hillary are on the docket. And if you haven't heard, two things have strangely happened since the CLinton agreed to show up. Bill has asked for the entire Epstein Files to be opened. And Chump has decided that Bill is once again his buddy now. You actually think the Democrats are going to throw a flamethrower at the Clintons?

Such a weird flex that you want them to just name names. A bunch of names doesn't tell us much. This phony drip drip doesn't tell us much. But, you won't be convinced that the Dems are just as much to blame, so we're done here.

Ah the ol' "both sides" thing.

exactly how the dems to blame here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My takeaway is not to admire and aspire to the glitterati and upper most echelons of power. There is a level of wealth that is gross and always ties back to some level of exploitation. And with it often comes a feeling that the rules no longer apply as seen in royal families and the behavior of some politicians, power brokers, and celebrities.

We are normal level wealthy through great educations without loans and luck with regular w2 jobs, and through work, private schools and social connections have opportunities to rub shoulders with famous names, some of them already cancelled. I already felt this way but the Epstein files reaffirmed that we want to keep our heads down, live in the regular world and stay away from the private jet set. My kids agree that happiness is found in the real world and not the flashy and glossy one.

🙄🙄🙄🙄

Gosh some of the people on this board

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My takeaway is not to admire and aspire to the glitterati and upper most echelons of power. There is a level of wealth that is gross and always ties back to some level of exploitation. And with it often comes a feeling that the rules no longer apply as seen in royal families and the behavior of some politicians, power brokers, and celebrities.

We are normal level wealthy through great educations without loans and luck with regular w2 jobs, and through work, private schools and social connections have opportunities to rub shoulders with famous names, some of them already cancelled. I already felt this way but the Epstein files reaffirmed that we want to keep our heads down, live in the regular world and stay away from the private jet set. My kids agree that happiness is found in the real world and not the flashy and glossy one.

Why would you socialize with bad people? Doesn’t that make you part of the problem? Why do people with money hold petty crimes and indiscretions over the heads of poor people all in the name of propriety and good character while giving an open pass to elites who have done far worse? I can’t get a job at Safeway with a criminal record or bad references yet Goldman Sachs apparently lets anyone work there as long as they are well connected.

[Anonymous]

My point was that we could strive to socialize with fancy pants people and unlike some actively avoid it. We’re not looking for more and more: flashy jobs, elite memberships, glossy friendships, and events, we’re actively avoiding some kind of leveling up for ourselves or our kids because it’s gross up there and that’s not where contentment or our hopes for the future of the world lies.

[Anonymous]

It seems that most of these young girls had zero supervision from an adult. When I was 13, my parents knew where I was all the time and knew the parents of my friends.

There was only one girl who told her mother about Epstein and the mother reported it to the police who did nothing.

Obviously, these girls (and boys) were "throw aways" to every one of the people oinvolved.

There was parental neglect and law enforcement corruption on an epic scale!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems that most of these young girls had zero supervision from an adult. When I was 13, my parents knew where I was all the time and knew the parents of my friends.

There was only one girl who told her mother about Epstein and the mother reported it to the police who did nothing.

Obviously, these girls (and boys) were "throw aways" to every one of the people oinvolved.

There was parental neglect and law enforcement corruption on an epic scale!

If you go deeper into the files (or watch lots of instagram videos of those who do) any point of contact for one of these men was an opportunity to traffic women or girls.

Professors at Ivy League schools targeted “small, blonde” students to introduce to Epstein.

Models were brought into his radius.

Friends of the children of people who associated with Epstein could be roped into this.

These weren’t just wayward kids without good families. Basically if you were unlucky enough to make any contact with an Epstein associate, you could end up at his island.

I also learned that a lot of the people facilitating Epstein’s crimes were WOMEN. He had so many friends, workers, and associates who were women. Women who had been victimized by him turned around and victimized other women. It’s disgusting.

[Anonymous]

I’ve learned that you should not malign conspiracy theorists. Pizzagate and Qanon were not wrong. Many references to pizza exist in the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

That if you’re rich and powerful you can get away with almost anything

[Anonymous]

I learned that Jews talk shit about non Jews regularly

[Anonymous]

I also learned that insider trading is the key to wealth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems that most of these young girls had zero supervision from an adult. When I was 13, my parents knew where I was all the time and knew the parents of my friends.

There was only one girl who told her mother about Epstein and the mother reported it to the police who did nothing.

Obviously, these girls (and boys) were "throw aways" to every one of the people oinvolved.

There was parental neglect and law enforcement corruption on an epic scale!

Blame the parents, mmmkay.

This is why we can't have nice things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems that most of these young girls had zero supervision from an adult. When I was 13, my parents knew where I was all the time and knew the parents of my friends.

There was only one girl who told her mother about Epstein and the mother reported it to the police who did nothing.

Obviously, these girls (and boys) were "throw aways" to every one of the people oinvolved.

There was parental neglect and law enforcement corruption on an epic scale!

Blame the parents, mmmkay.

This is why we can't have nice things.

Two things can be true. Money talks to some people. I think most everyone agrees that Epstein was an awful pedophile. He was also a master manipulator.