Then you have no problem with the term “illegal” in general. Illegal drugs, prostitution, gambling, pollution, theft, embezzlement, physical harm, it’s all good as long as you get to define what laws have “really” been broken. |
This response is the main purpose of this thread. Can you add racist, Nazi,Gestapo, blah, blah, blah…so we can finish this thread. The internet and society will surely change forever based on your unending insults. |
| Notice how the anti-Republican comments here are have no specifics or nuance. They are the playground taunts of 2nd graders. Stupid MAGA! Can MAGA even read? |
What does language have to do with driving skills? Do you think cars don’t exist in other countries? One can make the exact same omniscient, cherry picked argument for bad Republican drivers who kill people with cars (and any Republican DMV workers who approved their licenses), which shows that it’s not a valid line of thinking. Your argument has some glaring fundamental flaws and cognitive errors. Being a bigot, blaming every bad thing that happens on Democrats, and mumbling “stupid” when cornered doesn’t help your case. |
ICE is violating laws left and right with illegal searches and seizures, breaking and entering, warrantless arrests, and extrajudicial murders. A large proportion of the detainees have legal status. People complying with their paperwork are getting picked up at routine check-ins. Students are getting visas revoked and being deported for being critical of Trump, in violation of the First Amendment. But, apparently it’s all good as long as your side is the one that gets to decide what “laws” are being broken. |
Were you just as upset by the right’s behavior over the attack on Paul Pelosi and the brutal assassinations of the Minnesota lawmakers? Are you angry about Trump’s racist depiction of the Obamas? If the answer is no, then you aren’t concerned with respect and decorum. |
Sorry to disappoint you but a huge number of people on the left barely even know or care who Charlie or Erika Kirk even are. You make too much of your own cultish followership of people like that. |
| It was interesting how, after Charlie Kirk’s death, quoting Charlie Kirk’s own words was perceived as hateful. I wonder why? |
I don't vote for Republicans, friend. And I'm not a narcissist. But I am sick of Dems like you. |
WHERE are these supposedly "sane conversations with Republicans?" I haven't heard a sane Republican in at least 10 years plus. Instead of talking facts and logic, all they do is repeat whatever inane thing Trump and his mouthpieces say. And that's the reason there are nonstop scolding lectures from the left. I would LOVE it if Republicans started having sane conversations again. I would LOVE it if Republicans actually started acknowledging facts and data and started using logic as opposed to just parroting nonsense. But they're going to have to get rid of Trump for that to happen. |
You had to be extremely “online” to know who Charlie Kirk was at all. Most people are not. My parents were so confused by the media coverage of him. |
+1 Some of these posts come across as “how do you do, fellow kids?” It’s a little hard to believe that someone who spent years campaigning against Republicans and marched in a pussy hat and was loudly anti-Trump suddenly thinks progressives are annoying scolds. Caring more about policing the behavior of others than the policies sounds very MAGA. |
| And to add, posing as other people online in order to make unpopular policies seem more popular is very MAGA. Just ask Dean Browning. |
If you can’t read the signs, you can’t be safe of the roads. And here comes the bigot accusation. You are not a serious person. |
DCUM comments have been disgusting enough to tell me all I need to know about the left |