British Women and Their Fashion Mishaps: Part 1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok Meghan is not a royal and the York ladies are far more beautiful so there’s that.

There it is. Some of you losers can't let a page go by without slamming Meghan.

Anyway, I think the York sisters are attractive.

To be fair, I brought Meghan up when I was defending Bea. A true Meghan hater would bring her up out of the ether. ("Wow, it sure is a beautiful day today, the sky is so blue!" "You know what else was blue? The Safiyah Couture dress Meghan Markle wore during her 2018 tour of Australia and New Zealand where she so rudely announced her pregnancy even though Eugenie got married a week before and then the pregnancy was faked and blah de blah blah blah.")

I think Meghan and Kate are both beautiful in different ways. Kate is very much a sporty meets posh Modern Mom on the Go™️ and Meghan is a boho meets glam socialite. They've both worn things I'd love in my own closet, though I'd say if I had to pick I would say I'm more of a Kate just because a) I don't live in California and b) I have an office job. But Meghan has had some definite style wins in my book, although, again, given my skew towards Kate, my faves tend to be from when she was a working royal as opposed to doing a glam farmhouse vibe in Cali.

The Givenchy from her first engagement with the Queen comes to mind:



As does the goldenrod Brandon Maxwell:



Side note, I miss Kate's 2011-2016ish style. This was my favorite evening gown from that era:

Said no-one ever. Posh meets glam socialite? I'm not a Meghan hater, but this is absolutely not how I would ever describe her. I don't think she's posh or glam. Sure, she's a socialite. She has a very coastal California rich mom, elegant, but still casual style that is highly relatable. I think that's the opposite of posh and glam.

I’m not a Megan hater either, but she certainly makes herself an easy target. Megan’s style is inconsistent and ever changing… kinda like she’s still trying to figure who she wants to be when she grows up. And Interestingly, in the last year or so, she’s worn several very androgynous styles that weren’t flattering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok Meghan is not a royal and the York ladies are far more beautiful so there’s that.

There it is. Some of you losers can't let a page go by without slamming Meghan.

Anyway, I think the York sisters are attractive.

To be fair, I brought Meghan up when I was defending Bea. A true Meghan hater would bring her up out of the ether. ("Wow, it sure is a beautiful day today, the sky is so blue!" "You know what else was blue? The Safiyah Couture dress Meghan Markle wore during her 2018 tour of Australia and New Zealand where she so rudely announced her pregnancy even though Eugenie got married a week before and then the pregnancy was faked and blah de blah blah blah.")

I think Meghan and Kate are both beautiful in different ways. Kate is very much a sporty meets posh Modern Mom on the Go™️ and Meghan is a boho meets glam socialite. They've both worn things I'd love in my own closet, though I'd say if I had to pick I would say I'm more of a Kate just because a) I don't live in California and b) I have an office job. But Meghan has had some definite style wins in my book, although, again, given my skew towards Kate, my faves tend to be from when she was a working royal as opposed to doing a glam farmhouse vibe in Cali.

The Givenchy from her first engagement with the Queen comes to mind:



As does the goldenrod Brandon Maxwell:



Side note, I miss Kate's 2011-2016ish style. This was my favorite evening gown from that era:

Said no-one ever. Posh meets glam socialite? I'm not a Meghan hater, but this is absolutely not how I would ever describe her. I don't think she's posh or glam. Sure, she's a socialite. She has a very coastal California rich mom, elegant, but still casual style that is highly relatable. I think that's the opposite of posh and glam.

I’m not a Megan hater either, but she certainly makes herself an easy target. Megan’s style is inconsistent and ever changing… kinda like she’s still trying to figure who she wants to be when she grows up. And Interestingly, in the last year or so, she’s worn several very androgynous styles that weren’t flattering.

I really like Meghan (even bought some of her wine) but yeah sometimes her style is doo doo.

She wears a lot of baggy oversized shit that is in style but she's 5'6" and slim. What looks good going down the runway on a 5'10" model is going to overpower her...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think Princess Beatrice is very pretty and I hate that she gets made fun of for being chubby, bug-eyed, etc. She's not some trashy fake blonde (I am a fake blonde, this is not a dig at my fellow untrashy fake blondes) but she has a very uniquely British look. I think her style is interesting, and she's clearly into fashion and the arts.

Zara and Mike are trashy; it's crazy to me that people make fun of Harry and Meghan for "falling from grace" for doing podcasts and television and yet, Mike has a podcast and does reality shows. Plus he cheats on her and is constantly name dropping that he's related to the P&P of Wales by marriage. Like, we know dude, you have a group chat with Kate Middleton about school pickup. That is the most interesting thing about you other than your brief stint on "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!" so we definitely didn't forget. I don't think Zara dresses particularly well and she's mannish looking.

Anyway, this thread will not go well and be deleted by nightfall due to British royal family fans' inability to read ANYTHING critical of their precious Kate. (Who I also love and think is incredibly well dressed but I don't care if other people don't agree.)

Finding Princess Beatrice more attractive than Zara Tindall is a wild take. I think the press is mean to poor Beatrice about her looks (she didn't enter the pubic eye by choice), but she is objectively not pretty.

I do love British royal fashion in general and colorful wool coats in particular. Princess Catherine has amazing style and I love seeing an objectively beautiful woman dressing to be elegant without also needing to dress in a sexualized way.

So I don’t know who Zara Tindall is, but this is the first photo that came up when I googled her and I can’t believe anyone finds her objectively more attractive than Beatrice. Beatrice isn’t classically beautiful, but she’s pretty. Also, I thought the photo above had Zara with her husband and couldn’t figure out why he was so short! Lady Louise is my new favorite royal. Her old man getup makes her a doppelgänger for the senior volunteer docents at the zoo

DCUMommies prefer thin blonde women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

I'm the op and I only posted the first two photos. There's another fantastic photog poster. That said, I can only post from twitter and Remisagoodboy makes it easy for me and my life is all about me.

If you don't like it, scoot.

How 'bout you get a life, loser?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I wasn’t aware of Lady Louise, but I took one look at this picture and knew she was a horse girl. I looked her up, and indeed she is an avid equestrian. Zara Tindall is also a world class equestrian and Olympic silver medalist. These ladies don’t care that much for fashion and just want to get back to the barn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think Princess Beatrice is very pretty and I hate that she gets made fun of for being chubby, bug-eyed, etc. She's not some trashy fake blonde (I am a fake blonde, this is not a dig at my fellow untrashy fake blondes) but she has a very uniquely British look. I think her style is interesting, and she's clearly into fashion and the arts.

Zara and Mike are trashy; it's crazy to me that people make fun of Harry and Meghan for "falling from grace" for doing podcasts and television and yet, Mike has a podcast and does reality shows. Plus he cheats on her and is constantly name dropping that he's related to the P&P of Wales by marriage. Like, we know dude, you have a group chat with Kate Middleton about school pickup. That is the most interesting thing about you other than your brief stint on "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!" so we definitely didn't forget. I don't think Zara dresses particularly well and she's mannish looking.

Anyway, this thread will not go well and be deleted by nightfall due to British royal family fans' inability to read ANYTHING critical of their precious Kate. (Who I also love and think is incredibly well dressed but I don't care if other people don't agree.)

Finding Princess Beatrice more attractive than Zara Tindall is a wild take. I think the press is mean to poor Beatrice about her looks (she didn't enter the pubic eye by choice), but she is objectively not pretty.

I do love British royal fashion in general and colorful wool coats in particular. Princess Catherine has amazing style and I love seeing an objectively beautiful woman dressing to be elegant without also needing to dress in a sexualized way.

So I don’t know who Zara Tindall is, but this is the first photo that came up when I googled her and I can’t believe anyone finds her objectively more attractive than Beatrice. Beatrice isn’t classically beautiful, but she’s pretty. Also, I thought the photo above had Zara with her husband and couldn’t figure out why he was so short! Lady Louise is my new favorite royal. Her old man getup makes her a doppelgänger for the senior volunteer docents at the zoo

DCUMommies prefer thin blonde women.

She's not thin, though. She's very squat. I say this as someone built like her:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok Meghan is not a royal and the York ladies are far more beautiful so there’s that.

There it is. Some of you losers can't let a page go by without slamming Meghan.

Anyway, I think the York sisters are attractive.

To be fair, I brought Meghan up when I was defending Bea. A true Meghan hater would bring her up out of the ether. ("Wow, it sure is a beautiful day today, the sky is so blue!" "You know what else was blue? The Safiyah Couture dress Meghan Markle wore during her 2018 tour of Australia and New Zealand where she so rudely announced her pregnancy even though Eugenie got married a week before and then the pregnancy was faked and blah de blah blah blah.")

I think Meghan and Kate are both beautiful in different ways. Kate is very much a sporty meets posh Modern Mom on the Go™️ and Meghan is a boho meets glam socialite. They've both worn things I'd love in my own closet, though I'd say if I had to pick I would say I'm more of a Kate just because a) I don't live in California and b) I have an office job. But Meghan has had some definite style wins in my book, although, again, given my skew towards Kate, my faves tend to be from when she was a working royal as opposed to doing a glam farmhouse vibe in Cali.

The Givenchy from her first engagement with the Queen comes to mind:



As does the goldenrod Brandon Maxwell:



Side note, I miss Kate's 2011-2016ish style. This was my favorite evening gown from that era:

Said no-one ever. Posh meets glam socialite? I'm not a Meghan hater, but this is absolutely not how I would ever describe her. I don't think she's posh or glam. Sure, she's a socialite. She has a very coastal California rich mom, elegant, but still casual style that is highly relatable. I think that's the opposite of posh and glam.

I’m not a Megan hater either, but she certainly makes herself an easy target. Megan’s style is inconsistent and ever changing… kinda like she’s still trying to figure who she wants to be when she grows up. And Interestingly, in the last year or so, she’s worn several very androgynous styles that weren’t flattering.

I literally can’t stand her, she’s ridiculous. Her fashion is terrible… And this thread is about British women, which she is not.
Let’s stick to the topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think Princess Beatrice is very pretty and I hate that she gets made fun of for being chubby, bug-eyed, etc. She's not some trashy fake blonde (I am a fake blonde, this is not a dig at my fellow untrashy fake blondes) but she has a very uniquely British look. I think her style is interesting, and she's clearly into fashion and the arts.

Zara and Mike are trashy; it's crazy to me that people make fun of Harry and Meghan for "falling from grace" for doing podcasts and television and yet, Mike has a podcast and does reality shows. Plus he cheats on her and is constantly name dropping that he's related to the P&P of Wales by marriage. Like, we know dude, you have a group chat with Kate Middleton about school pickup. That is the most interesting thing about you other than your brief stint on "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!" so we definitely didn't forget. I don't think Zara dresses particularly well and she's mannish looking.

Anyway, this thread will not go well and be deleted by nightfall due to British royal family fans' inability to read ANYTHING critical of their precious Kate. (Who I also love and think is incredibly well dressed but I don't care if other people don't agree.)

Finding Princess Beatrice more attractive than Zara Tindall is a wild take. I think the press is mean to poor Beatrice about her looks (she didn't enter the pubic eye by choice), but she is objectively not pretty.

I do love British royal fashion in general and colorful wool coats in particular. Princess Catherine has amazing style and I love seeing an objectively beautiful woman dressing to be elegant without also needing to dress in a sexualized way.

So I don’t know who Zara Tindall is, but this is the first photo that came up when I googled her and I can’t believe anyone finds her objectively more attractive than Beatrice. Beatrice isn’t classically beautiful, but she’s pretty. Also, I thought the photo above had Zara with her husband and couldn’t figure out why he was so short! Lady Louise is my new favorite royal. Her old man getup makes her a doppelgänger for the senior volunteer docents at the zoo

DCUMommies prefer thin blonde women.

This is beyond ridiculous. Who cares if she’s “thin or blonde” - she’s most definitely more attractive than Beatrice, who looks like a bug eyed beanie baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think Princess Beatrice is very pretty and I hate that she gets made fun of for being chubby, bug-eyed, etc. She's not some trashy fake blonde (I am a fake blonde, this is not a dig at my fellow untrashy fake blondes) but she has a very uniquely British look. I think her style is interesting, and she's clearly into fashion and the arts.

Zara and Mike are trashy; it's crazy to me that people make fun of Harry and Meghan for "falling from grace" for doing podcasts and television and yet, Mike has a podcast and does reality shows. Plus he cheats on her and is constantly name dropping that he's related to the P&P of Wales by marriage. Like, we know dude, you have a group chat with Kate Middleton about school pickup. That is the most interesting thing about you other than your brief stint on "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!" so we definitely didn't forget. I don't think Zara dresses particularly well and she's mannish looking.

Anyway, this thread will not go well and be deleted by nightfall due to British royal family fans' inability to read ANYTHING critical of their precious Kate. (Who I also love and think is incredibly well dressed but I don't care if other people don't agree.)

Finding Princess Beatrice more attractive than Zara Tindall is a wild take. I think the press is mean to poor Beatrice about her looks (she didn't enter the pubic eye by choice), but she is objectively not pretty.

I do love British royal fashion in general and colorful wool coats in particular. Princess Catherine has amazing style and I love seeing an objectively beautiful woman dressing to be elegant without also needing to dress in a sexualized way.

So I don’t know who Zara Tindall is, but this is the first photo that came up when I googled her and I can’t believe anyone finds her objectively more attractive than Beatrice. Beatrice isn’t classically beautiful, but she’s pretty. Also, I thought the photo above had Zara with her husband and couldn’t figure out why he was so short! Lady Louise is my new favorite royal. Her old man getup makes her a doppelgänger for the senior volunteer docents at the zoo

DCUMommies prefer thin blonde women.

This is beyond ridiculous. Who cares if she’s “thin or blonde” - she’s most definitely more attractive than Beatrice, who looks like a bug eyed beanie baby.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok Meghan is not a royal and the York ladies are far more beautiful so there’s that.

There it is. Some of you losers can't let a page go by without slamming Meghan.

Anyway, I think the York sisters are attractive.

To be fair, I brought Meghan up when I was defending Bea. A true Meghan hater would bring her up out of the ether. ("Wow, it sure is a beautiful day today, the sky is so blue!" "You know what else was blue? The Safiyah Couture dress Meghan Markle wore during her 2018 tour of Australia and New Zealand where she so rudely announced her pregnancy even though Eugenie got married a week before and then the pregnancy was faked and blah de blah blah blah.")

I think Meghan and Kate are both beautiful in different ways. Kate is very much a sporty meets posh Modern Mom on the Go™️ and Meghan is a boho meets glam socialite. They've both worn things I'd love in my own closet, though I'd say if I had to pick I would say I'm more of a Kate just because a) I don't live in California and b) I have an office job. But Meghan has had some definite style wins in my book, although, again, given my skew towards Kate, my faves tend to be from when she was a working royal as opposed to doing a glam farmhouse vibe in Cali.

The Givenchy from her first engagement with the Queen comes to mind:



As does the goldenrod Brandon Maxwell:



Side note, I miss Kate's 2011-2016ish style. This was my favorite evening gown from that era:

Said no-one ever. Posh meets glam socialite? I'm not a Meghan hater, but this is absolutely not how I would ever describe her. I don't think she's posh or glam. Sure, she's a socialite. She has a very coastal California rich mom, elegant, but still casual style that is highly relatable. I think that's the opposite of posh and glam.

I’m not a Megan hater either, but she certainly makes herself an easy target. Megan’s style is inconsistent and ever changing… kinda like she’s still trying to figure who she wants to be when she grows up. And Interestingly, in the last year or so, she’s worn several very androgynous styles that weren’t flattering.

I literally can’t stand her, she’s ridiculous. Her fashion is terrible… And this thread is about British women, which she is not.
Let’s stick to the topic.

She's married to a non-working member of the British Royal Family. If you don't like her, don't post about her or read posts about her, but you don't get to dictate what a thread is about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The coats are lovely and both women look good. What’s your point, OP?

Not OP, but I'm not surprised that a woman in the DMV thinks this is lovely. And no, I'm not a Kardashian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The coats are lovely and both women look good. What’s your point, OP?

Not OP, but I'm not surprised that a woman in the DMV thinks this is lovely. And no, I'm not a Kardashian.

I'm a woman in the DMV and I think it looks like shit. I'm not a Kartrashian, either!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The coats are lovely and both women look good. What’s your point, OP?

Not OP, but I'm not surprised that a woman in the DMV thinks this is lovely. And no, I'm not a Kardashian.

Fwiw it's probably less that PP actually thinks it looks "lovely" and more that they just want to signal their superiority by not caring about fashion.

There is a weird subgroup of posters who specifically come to the fashion forum to complain that women are - gasp! - talking about fashion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You mean like this?

More of this! There's a certain subset of Americans who think the British are all upper-class and well-dressed/behaved. I have to laugh - if only they knew!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok Meghan is not a royal and the York ladies are far more beautiful so there’s that.

There it is. Some of you losers can't let a page go by without slamming Meghan.

Anyway, I think the York sisters are attractive.

To be fair, I brought Meghan up when I was defending Bea. A true Meghan hater would bring her up out of the ether. ("Wow, it sure is a beautiful day today, the sky is so blue!" "You know what else was blue? The Safiyah Couture dress Meghan Markle wore during her 2018 tour of Australia and New Zealand where she so rudely announced her pregnancy even though Eugenie got married a week before and then the pregnancy was faked and blah de blah blah blah.")

I think Meghan and Kate are both beautiful in different ways. Kate is very much a sporty meets posh Modern Mom on the Go™️ and Meghan is a boho meets glam socialite. They've both worn things I'd love in my own closet, though I'd say if I had to pick I would say I'm more of a Kate just because a) I don't live in California and b) I have an office job. But Meghan has had some definite style wins in my book, although, again, given my skew towards Kate, my faves tend to be from when she was a working royal as opposed to doing a glam farmhouse vibe in Cali.

The Givenchy from her first engagement with the Queen comes to mind:



As does the goldenrod Brandon Maxwell:



Side note, I miss Kate's 2011-2016ish style. This was my favorite evening gown from that era:

Said no-one ever. Posh meets glam socialite? I'm not a Meghan hater, but this is absolutely not how I would ever describe her. I don't think she's posh or glam. Sure, she's a socialite. She has a very coastal California rich mom, elegant, but still casual style that is highly relatable. I think that's the opposite of posh and glam.

I’m not a Megan hater either, but she certainly makes herself an easy target. Megan’s style is inconsistent and ever changing… kinda like she’s still trying to figure who she wants to be when she grows up. And Interestingly, in the last year or so, she’s worn several very androgynous styles that weren’t flattering.

I literally can’t stand her, she’s ridiculous. Her fashion is terrible… And this thread is about British women, which she is not.
Let’s stick to the topic.

I agree. She is not British and thus not the subject of this thread.
DP