British Women and Their Fashion Mishaps: Part 1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok Meghan is not a royal and the York ladies are far more beautiful so there’s that.

There it is. Some of you losers can't let a page go by without slamming Meghan.

Anyway, I think the York sisters are attractive.

To be fair, I brought Meghan up when I was defending Bea. A true Meghan hater would bring her up out of the ether. ("Wow, it sure is a beautiful day today, the sky is so blue!" "You know what else was blue? The Safiyah Couture dress Meghan Markle wore during her 2018 tour of Australia and New Zealand where she so rudely announced her pregnancy even though Eugenie got married a week before and then the pregnancy was faked and blah de blah blah blah.")

I think Meghan and Kate are both beautiful in different ways. Kate is very much a sporty meets posh Modern Mom on the Go™️ and Meghan is a boho meets glam socialite. They've both worn things I'd love in my own closet, though I'd say if I had to pick I would say I'm more of a Kate just because a) I don't live in California and b) I have an office job. But Meghan has had some definite style wins in my book, although, again, given my skew towards Kate, my faves tend to be from when she was a working royal as opposed to doing a glam farmhouse vibe in Cali.

The Givenchy from her first engagement with the Queen comes to mind:



As does the goldenrod Brandon Maxwell:



Side note, I miss Kate's 2011-2016ish style. This was my favorite evening gown from that era:

Said no-one ever. Posh meets glam socialite? I'm not a Meghan hater, but this is absolutely not how I would ever describe her. I don't think she's posh or glam. Sure, she's a socialite. She has a very coastal California rich mom, elegant, but still casual style that is highly relatable. I think that's the opposite of posh and glam.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean like this?

LOVED THIS SHOW back in the day.

edi and pats forever! THE BOLLI DAHLING

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

Agree 100%. Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

I'm lmao at the boomerness of calling a twitter account a "site" lol.

I am not that poster but I think she just posts it because Remoulade is freakishly obsessed with Melania and Usha, so for the Trump women fashion thread it's just easy to get a pic of Melania or Usha's outfit from Rem's twitter. Not really sure how that's "boring," unless you find the content boring (which would be fair because there's only so much to say about Mel's coat dresses or Usha's whatever.) The point is to discuss their fashion so what does it matter where a pic of their outfit comes from? How is a pic from one twitter account more or less boring than a pic from a magazine?

Although who knows, the person who always gets weirdly defensive over the Trump women could be Rem. Maybe she noticed her traffic coming from here and got curious lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

I'm lmao at the boomerness of calling a twitter account a "site" lol.

I am not that poster but I think she just posts it because Remoulade is freakishly obsessed with Melania and Usha, so for the Trump women fashion thread it's just easy to get a pic of Melania or Usha's outfit from Rem's twitter. Not really sure how that's "boring," unless you find the content boring (which would be fair because there's only so much to say about Mel's coat dresses or Usha's whatever.) The point is to discuss their fashion so what does it matter where a pic of their outfit comes from? How is a pic from one twitter account more or less boring than a pic from a magazine?

Although who knows, the person who always gets weirdly defensive over the Trump women could be Rem. Maybe she noticed her traffic coming from here and got curious lol.

Not the above poster, but what is wrong with you? "Boomerness"? And the PP was talking about the British fashion for this thread, not the Trump women thread you seem to be obsessed with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

I'm lmao at the boomerness of calling a twitter account a "site" lol.

I am not that poster but I think she just posts it because Remoulade is freakishly obsessed with Melania and Usha, so for the Trump women fashion thread it's just easy to get a pic of Melania or Usha's outfit from Rem's twitter. Not really sure how that's "boring," unless you find the content boring (which would be fair because there's only so much to say about Mel's coat dresses or Usha's whatever.) The point is to discuss their fashion so what does it matter where a pic of their outfit comes from? How is a pic from one twitter account more or less boring than a pic from a magazine?

Although who knows, the person who always gets weirdly defensive over the Trump women could be Rem. Maybe she noticed her traffic coming from here and got curious lol.

Not the above poster, but what is wrong with you? "Boomerness"? And the PP was talking about the British fashion for this thread, not the Trump women thread you seem to be obsessed with.

I was explaining the source of the twitter account. That's how it found its way to DCUM, through the Trump women thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think Princess Beatrice is very pretty and I hate that she gets made fun of for being chubby, bug-eyed, etc. She's not some trashy fake blonde (I am a fake blonde, this is not a dig at my fellow untrashy fake blondes) but she has a very uniquely British look. I think her style is interesting, and she's clearly into fashion and the arts.

Zara and Mike are trashy; it's crazy to me that people make fun of Harry and Meghan for "falling from grace" for doing podcasts and television and yet, Mike has a podcast and does reality shows. Plus he cheats on her and is constantly name dropping that he's related to the P&P of Wales by marriage. Like, we know dude, you have a group chat with Kate Middleton about school pickup. That is the most interesting thing about you other than your brief stint on "I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!" so we definitely didn't forget. I don't think Zara dresses particularly well and she's mannish looking.

Anyway, this thread will not go well and be deleted by nightfall due to British royal family fans' inability to read ANYTHING critical of their precious Kate. (Who I also love and think is incredibly well dressed but I don't care if other people don't agree.)

Finding Princess Beatrice more attractive than Zara Tindall is a wild take. I think the press is mean to poor Beatrice about her looks (she didn't enter the pubic eye by choice), but she is objectively not pretty.

I do love British royal fashion in general and colorful wool coats in particular. Princess Catherine has amazing style and I love seeing an objectively beautiful woman dressing to be elegant without also needing to dress in a sexualized way.

So I don’t know who Zara Tindall is, but this is the first photo that came up when I googled her and I can’t believe anyone finds her objectively more attractive than Beatrice. Beatrice isn’t classically beautiful, but she’s pretty. Also, I thought the photo above had Zara with her husband and couldn’t figure out why he was so short! Lady Louise is my new favorite royal. Her old man getup makes her a doppelgänger for the senior volunteer docents at the zoo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

I'm the op and I only posted the first two photos. There's another fantastic photog poster. That said, I can only post from twitter and Remisagoodboy makes it easy for me and my life is all about me.

If you don't like it, scoot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really feel like there is one super lazy poster here who just posts from that Remoulade sauce site over and over again and it's SO. BORING. Find other sources, lady.

I'm lmao at the boomerness of calling a twitter account a "site" lol.

I am not that poster but I think she just posts it because Remoulade is freakishly obsessed with Melania and Usha, so for the Trump women fashion thread it's just easy to get a pic of Melania or Usha's outfit from Rem's twitter. Not really sure how that's "boring," unless you find the content boring (which would be fair because there's only so much to say about Mel's coat dresses or Usha's whatever.) The point is to discuss their fashion so what does it matter where a pic of their outfit comes from? How is a pic from one twitter account more or less boring than a pic from a magazine?

Although who knows, the person who always gets weirdly defensive over the Trump women could be Rem. Maybe she noticed her traffic coming from here and got curious lol.

Thank you for defending me! --OP Also, not a boomer. I'd love it if Ms. Rem was on here. If she's brave, she'd out herself. I"m sure we could have a very fun, productive convo.

[Anonymous]

Lets not forget that neither Diana, nor Kate, Meghan etc were raised as royalty so they aren't princesses in that regard with a privileged brought up.

[Anonymous]

Their headpiece, hats, headbands and scarfs are to avoid hair becoming a mess due to wind and rain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lets not forget that neither Diana, nor Kate, Meghan etc were raised as royalty so they aren't princesses in that regard with a privileged brought up.

Diana was part of the nobility and so definitely was born into great wealth and privilege. Kate's parents are self made with their business; Meghan's dad won the lottery but she wasn't brought up by parents who earned good money or inherited it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lets not forget that neither Diana, nor Kate, Meghan etc were raised as royalty so they aren't princesses in that regard with a privileged brought up.

Diana was part of the nobility and so definitely was born into great wealth and privilege. Kate's parents are self made with their business; Meghan's dad won the lottery but she wasn't brought up by parents who earned good money or inherited it.

+1. Diana's father, and now brother, was an Earl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You mean like this?

Love Chav fashion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lets not forget that neither Diana, nor Kate, Meghan etc were raised as royalty so they aren't princesses in that regard with a privileged brought up.

Some believe that Diana had a more aristocratic heritage than the royal family. The other two, sure.