Mls Next going to school year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

We are the top product. We have the professional customers. They will keep buying our product no matter what features our competitors introduce.



Oops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

We are the top product. We have the professional customers. They will keep buying our product no matter what features our competitors introduce.



Oops.

I dont understand what youre trying to show.

MLS2 and ECNL are roughly the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

We are the top product. We have the professional customers. They will keep buying our product no matter what features our competitors introduce.



Oops.

I dont understand what youre trying to show.

MLS2 and ECNL are roughly the same thing.

If you think so, you are an idiot and will get scammed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

ECNL:MLSN as is apples:oranges
MLSN:MLS as is tortoise:hare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

We are the top product. We have the professional customers. They will keep buying our product no matter what features our competitors introduce.



Oops.

I dont understand what youre trying to show.

MLS2 and ECNL are roughly the same thing.

If you think so, you are an idiot and will get scammed.

You seem to have an age to grind with MLS. Whatever its not going to change the number of pro or college roster spots available. Both groups will be looking for the same type of player.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

I mean what’s to announce if they’re not changing?

I really don’t think MLSNext is going to loose much if they stay BY. This year, a few of our best players moved to other MSLNext clubs. And our ok and sub players moved to ECNL clubs where they got more playing time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

Uh, it’s all a form of glorified rec. You are holding on too tight dude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

P2P MLSN (90% of MLSN) is NOT equal to MLS Academy. Most of them are not qualified to play GA.

P2P MLSN is pushing for SY. At least that is what our coach said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

P2P MLSN (90% of MLSN) is NOT equal to MLS Academy. Most of them are not qualified to play GA.

P2P MLSN is pushing for SY. At least that is what our coach said.

This is the type of thing that makes no sense. MLSN is boys and GA is girls why would you compare the two?

Then you say that MLSN p2p is pushing for SY. Right after you ripped on MLS comparing them to a girls league. But at the same time you say your kid plays for MLS.

More likely you're a bitter ECNL player parent that hates MLS for some reason and is looking to stir the pot in whatever way possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

P2P MLSN (90% of MLSN) is NOT equal to MLS Academy. Most of them are not qualified to play GA.

P2P MLSN is pushing for SY. At least that is what our coach said.

This is the type of thing that makes no sense. MLSN is boys and GA is girls why would you compare the two?

Then you say that MLSN p2p is pushing for SY. Right after you ripped on MLS comparing them to a girls league. But at the same time you say your kid plays for MLS.

More likely you're a bitter ECNL player parent that hates MLS for some reason and is looking to stir the pot in whatever way possible.

In MLSN world, we call Generation Addidas Cup as GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

Uh, it’s all a form of glorified rec. You are holding on too tight dude.

Whats the percentage of MLS Next to ECNL players on USYNT?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for mlsn isn’t whether 1/1 or 8/1 is better. They’ve made it clear they prefer 1/1.

Mlsn needs to determine if staying 1/1 with everyone else going 8/1 will help or hurt them. Changing to 8/1 maintains status quo. Staying 1/1 with everyone else changing to 8/1 is a risk and they better be darn sure doing something different from everyone else will end up helping them.

There is zero risk to MLS Next

They are the top and superior league
Best players will gravitate there no matter the age cutoff

Acting on assumptions like this are how leagues go under. Can you imagine a business making a decision this way?

Mlsn is currently debating the pros and cons. If the above was correct they would have come out and announced they are staying BY a long time ago. It’s almost November and we are still waiting for a decision from them.

What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Club Academies?
What's the ECNL equivalent to Generation Adidas Cup?
What's the ECNL equivalent to MLS Next Cup with Scouts and College coaches?

Not rhetorical questions

Uh, it’s all a form of glorified rec. You are holding on too tight dude.

Whats the percentage of MLS Next to ECNL players on USYNT?

P2P MLSN (90% of MLSN) is 0%. Don't associate yourself with MLSN Academy. There is no connection except for one token game a year that we are playing down on a younger MLS Academy team now.