Boycott our Sinclair affiliate and its advertisers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

And yet they fired the CEO and Fortune says…

“Target hasn’t gotten its mojo back after boycotts and backlash over retracted DEI efforts. Foot traffic and revenue are still down.”

“For the second quarter of 2025, Placer.ai reports that foot traffic at Target is down 3.1% YoY. That means that if the correlation between its foot traffic reporting and Target’s total revenues reporting in the previous five quarters is consistent, Target will report a total revenue decline compared to the second quarter of 2024 of between 1.8% and 4.4%.

Retail Brew asked Target to comment on Placer.ai’s estimate that its foot traffic is down 3.1% for Q2, and whether it will report YoY revenue declines close to that. Target did not respond.”

https://fortune.com/2025/08/19/target-hasnt-gotten-its-mojo-back-after-boycotts-and-backlash-over-retracted-dei-efforts-foot-traffic-and-revenue-are-still-down/

Based on the actual numbers, the Fortune article is wrong. Those quarters are already reported and there is no decline.

[Anonymous]

I think you can do both -- boycott and engage in the political process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

And yet they fired the CEO and Fortune says…

“Target hasn’t gotten its mojo back after boycotts and backlash over retracted DEI efforts. Foot traffic and revenue are still down.”

“For the second quarter of 2025, Placer.ai reports that foot traffic at Target is down 3.1% YoY. That means that if the correlation between its foot traffic reporting and Target’s total revenues reporting in the previous five quarters is consistent, Target will report a total revenue decline compared to the second quarter of 2024 of between 1.8% and 4.4%.

Retail Brew asked Target to comment on Placer.ai’s estimate that its foot traffic is down 3.1% for Q2, and whether it will report YoY revenue declines close to that. Target did not respond.”

https://fortune.com/2025/08/19/target-hasnt-gotten-its-mojo-back-after-boycotts-and-backlash-over-retracted-dei-efforts-foot-traffic-and-revenue-are-still-down/

Based on the actual numbers, the Fortune article is wrong. Those quarters are already reported and there is no decline.

Readers should take the word of some random who doesn’t show her source over an economic reporter. Okay. Got it👌🏾

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

Just go look at Target's quarterly reports. It isn't hard. Thisis from the second quarter report. Draw your own conclusions.

"Guidance

For fiscal 2025, the Company is maintaining its expectation of a low-single digit decline in sales, and GAAP EPS of $8.00 to $10.00. Adjusted EPS, which excludes the gains from litigation settlements in the first quarter, is expected to be approximately $7.00 to $9.00.

Operating Results

Net Sales of $25.2 billion in the second quarter were 0.9 percent lower than last year, reflecting a merchandise sales decrease of 1.2 percent, partially offset by a 14.2 percent increase in non-merchandise sales. Comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a comparable store sales decline of 3.2 percent, partially offset by comparable digital sales growth of 4.3 percent. Second quarter operating income of $1.3 billion was 19.4 percent lower than last year."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

Just go look at Target's quarterly reports. It isn't hard. Thisis from the second quarter report. Draw your own conclusions.

"Guidance

For fiscal 2025, the Company is maintaining its expectation of a low-single digit decline in sales, and GAAP EPS of $8.00 to $10.00. Adjusted EPS, which excludes the gains from litigation settlements in the first quarter, is expected to be approximately $7.00 to $9.00.

Operating Results

Net Sales of $25.2 billion in the second quarter were 0.9 percent lower than last year, reflecting a merchandise sales decrease of 1.2 percent, partially offset by a 14.2 percent increase in non-merchandise sales. Comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a comparable store sales decline of 3.2 percent, partially offset by comparable digital sales growth of 4.3 percent. Second quarter operating income of $1.3 billion was 19.4 percent lower than last year."

Heck, even Target reported that there’s a sales decline, and expecting a further decline in the future. The operating income is 19.4% lower than this time last year. What’s your argument again that Target was doing okay and the boycott did not have an impact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

Just go look at Target's quarterly reports. It isn't hard. Thisis from the second quarter report. Draw your own conclusions.

"Guidance

For fiscal 2025, the Company is maintaining its expectation of a low-single digit decline in sales, and GAAP EPS of $8.00 to $10.00. Adjusted EPS, which excludes the gains from litigation settlements in the first quarter, is expected to be approximately $7.00 to $9.00.

Operating Results

Net Sales of $25.2 billion in the second quarter were 0.9 percent lower than last year, reflecting a merchandise sales decrease of 1.2 percent, partially offset by a 14.2 percent increase in non-merchandise sales. Comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a comparable store sales decline of 3.2 percent, partially offset by comparable digital sales growth of 4.3 percent. Second quarter operating income of $1.3 billion was 19.4 percent lower than last year."

Heck, even Target reported that there’s a sales decline, and expecting a further decline in the future. The operating income is 19.4% lower than this time last year. What’s your argument again that Target was doing okay and the boycott did not have an impact.

Operating income went down because salaries went up and they paid down debt. The boycott has zero to do with that. They sold the same amount of product. The point of a boycott is for people not to buy there. That didn’t happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

And yet they fired the CEO and Fortune says…

“Target hasn’t gotten its mojo back after boycotts and backlash over retracted DEI efforts. Foot traffic and revenue are still down.”

“For the second quarter of 2025, Placer.ai reports that foot traffic at Target is down 3.1% YoY. That means that if the correlation between its foot traffic reporting and Target’s total revenues reporting in the previous five quarters is consistent, Target will report a total revenue decline compared to the second quarter of 2024 of between 1.8% and 4.4%.

Retail Brew asked Target to comment on Placer.ai’s estimate that its foot traffic is down 3.1% for Q2, and whether it will report YoY revenue declines close to that. Target did not respond.”

https://fortune.com/2025/08/19/target-hasnt-gotten-its-mojo-back-after-boycotts-and-backlash-over-retracted-dei-efforts-foot-traffic-and-revenue-are-still-down/

Based on the actual numbers, the Fortune article is wrong. Those quarters are already reported and there is no decline.

I keep seeing you post this and someone needs to inform you about how $10 in 2025 is less value than $10 in 2022 due to inflation. Read a book and learn some basic business concepts before showing everyone how foolish you are. This is some truly basic stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Boycotting Sinclair won't work. You're wasting your time in thinking that you're doing something.

Your better course of action is to bombard your local congress-person with constituent emails. Show up to his/her events in protest. Make campaign contributions to primary opponents, etc... Political process is the path to success.

Not when the country is run by corporations vs our representatives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

Just go look at Target's quarterly reports. It isn't hard. Thisis from the second quarter report. Draw your own conclusions.

"Guidance

For fiscal 2025, the Company is maintaining its expectation of a low-single digit decline in sales, and GAAP EPS of $8.00 to $10.00. Adjusted EPS, which excludes the gains from litigation settlements in the first quarter, is expected to be approximately $7.00 to $9.00.

Operating Results

Net Sales of $25.2 billion in the second quarter were 0.9 percent lower than last year, reflecting a merchandise sales decrease of 1.2 percent, partially offset by a 14.2 percent increase in non-merchandise sales. Comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a comparable store sales decline of 3.2 percent, partially offset by comparable digital sales growth of 4.3 percent. Second quarter operating income of $1.3 billion was 19.4 percent lower than last year."

Heck, even Target reported that there’s a sales decline, and expecting a further decline in the future. The operating income is 19.4% lower than this time last year. What’s your argument again that Target was doing okay and the boycott did not have an impact.

Operating income went down because salaries went up and they paid down debt. The boycott has zero to do with that. They sold the same amount of product. The point of a boycott is for people not to buy there. That didn’t happen.

How could they have sold the same amount of products while reflecting the same revenue costs. What kind of voodoo accounting are you imagining. Do you think Colgate toothpaste, Brawny paper towels, Target clothing, Charmin toilet tissue, Kenvue Tylenol, Corning tablewares, and other goods sold at Target kept their prices at last year’s prices with no inflation. Come on, please think a little bit before posting your financial illiteracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

Just go look at Target's quarterly reports. It isn't hard. Thisis from the second quarter report. Draw your own conclusions.

"Guidance

For fiscal 2025, the Company is maintaining its expectation of a low-single digit decline in sales, and GAAP EPS of $8.00 to $10.00. Adjusted EPS, which excludes the gains from litigation settlements in the first quarter, is expected to be approximately $7.00 to $9.00.

Operating Results

Net Sales of $25.2 billion in the second quarter were 0.9 percent lower than last year, reflecting a merchandise sales decrease of 1.2 percent, partially offset by a 14.2 percent increase in non-merchandise sales. Comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a comparable store sales decline of 3.2 percent, partially offset by comparable digital sales growth of 4.3 percent. Second quarter operating income of $1.3 billion was 19.4 percent lower than last year."

Heck, even Target reported that there’s a sales decline, and expecting a further decline in the future. The operating income is 19.4% lower than this time last year. What’s your argument again that Target was doing okay and the boycott did not have an impact.

Operating income went down because salaries went up and they paid down debt. The boycott has zero to do with that. They sold the same amount of product. The point of a boycott is for people not to buy there. That didn’t happen.

Listen Ms No-Nothing, read what Target had to say for itself. The then CEO recognized the boycotts were a problem for the company. Hint- You won’t like it and come up with another KellyAnne alternative fact.

https://www.thestreet.com/retail/target-ceo-admits-a-major-mistake-amid-boycotts-from-customers#comments

https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/08/21/the-quiet-part-out-loud-target-ditching-dei-cost-the-ceo-his-job-and-investors-12-billion/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

First, what is your source for the posted numbers? Anybody can just post some random numbers without any authoritative source for the reader to verify.

Second, revenue is not earnings. What were Target’s Earnings during the timeframes you referenced. Revenue is what they sold. Earnings is what the kept, the bottom line, after taxes, salaries, expenses , dividends, etc are all paid out from the Revenue. Salaries, utilities, and other expenses typically increase year over year due to inflation. If the Revenue remained the same year over year, that’s not stable or growth, but a decline in the company’s bottom line profits. The stock price dramatic decline is an indication that Target is hurting.

Just go look at Target's quarterly reports. It isn't hard. Thisis from the second quarter report. Draw your own conclusions.

"Guidance

For fiscal 2025, the Company is maintaining its expectation of a low-single digit decline in sales, and GAAP EPS of $8.00 to $10.00. Adjusted EPS, which excludes the gains from litigation settlements in the first quarter, is expected to be approximately $7.00 to $9.00.

Operating Results

Net Sales of $25.2 billion in the second quarter were 0.9 percent lower than last year, reflecting a merchandise sales decrease of 1.2 percent, partially offset by a 14.2 percent increase in non-merchandise sales. Comparable sales decreased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, reflecting a comparable store sales decline of 3.2 percent, partially offset by comparable digital sales growth of 4.3 percent. Second quarter operating income of $1.3 billion was 19.4 percent lower than last year."

Heck, even Target reported that there’s a sales decline, and expecting a further decline in the future. The operating income is 19.4% lower than this time last year. What’s your argument again that Target was doing okay and the boycott did not have an impact.

Operating income went down because salaries went up and they paid down debt. The boycott has zero to do with that. They sold the same amount of product. The point of a boycott is for people not to buy there. That didn’t happen.

How could they have sold the same amount of products while reflecting the same revenue costs. What kind of voodoo accounting are you imagining. Do you think Colgate toothpaste, Brawny paper towels, Target clothing, Charmin toilet tissue, Kenvue Tylenol, Corning tablewares, and other goods sold at Target kept their prices at last year’s prices with no inflation. Come on, please think a little bit before posting your financial illiteracy.

What's next? Amazon goes bankrupt?!

[Anonymous]

Who are DC Sinclair's Advertisers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've been boycotting Sinclair and channel 7 for years: the presenters look like stepford wives and there is always a tone of fear or urgency to their reporting, or with the scrolling news on screen.

Prefer other local channels where newscasters look and behave like actual real people.

So how has that worked out for you? Are they out of business yet?

It's worked out great because I found out I really like Wusa9.

I'm also saving a lot of money by not shopping at Target. Win win.

We just shopped at Target this afternoon. It's weird that some of you seem to think you destroyed them and made them go broke.

+1
The delusions of grandeur among this crowd are epic.

Target Revenue by 1./4


2nd 1/4 2024 - $25M
3rd 1/4 2024 - $25M
4th 1/4 2024 - $30M

1st 1/4 2025 - $24M
2nd 1/4 2025 - $25M

I guess you showed them…..

Let's see what happens in the next six months. You seem particularly fixated on my posts, when I am just one person with a dislike of Sinclair stations.

I just personally hated the way all the Sinclair stations made the on air personalities look and the fearful tone the stations have.

Most less sensitive people weren't really aware of all this, but once they switch to other news sources it will become more apparent.

And now they have a cause...so check back six months from now with some figures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, if you want businesses to operate as reflections of your political values instead of as enterprises intended to make money for their shareholders and to provide employment for their employees.

You do realize that if a business fails to make money, it becomes unavailable to provide employment for workers, and it stops paying taxes.

Or maybe you think businesses are actually social services, with profitability being irrelevant.

I know businesses care about profit, which gives us as consumers a way (ie a voice) to tell them that they are not serving us well when THEY chose to base THEIR decisions on politics.