What are the academic programs each WASP is known for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In terms of particular programs at two of these colleges, Williams is notable for art history and Amherst is notable for neuroscience. Both offernational-level economics programs.

What does that mean? Amherst also seems to have very few permanent faculty and dedicated faculty to neuroscience.

With respect to the economics departments of Williams and Amherst, their faculty contribute research papers to economics journals at a rate greater than that of the faculty at some national universities over ten times their size.

They really don’t. The RePEc lists have multiple lists for this kind of thing, including ones that weight by the number of authors. Williams doesn’t crack the top 100 on any list. Amherst isn’t in the top 500.

Which is fine. They are LACs and they aren’t expected to. But let’s not overstate it.

Agree with the other poster though that Williams > Amherst in this field.

+1, if you’re that interested in economics and want to get into a top grad economics program, you shouldnt be afraid to work with the experts and attend Chicago, Princeton, Dartmouth etc. If you NEED a lac, Williams or Claremont Mckenna are the strongest bets.

You comment is nonsensical, more anti-SLAC bias from the peanut gallery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

Amherst is the number 1 lac for christs sakes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a valid question. They are known for being strong all around SLACs. They really aren’t known for each having a specific strength.

Agreed. You generally go to a SLAC for a well-rounded liberal arts education (which unfortunately no longer seems to be valued). Learn how to think. So though some might theoretically be better than others in particular areas, if you are going to college because you want to be 100% focused on bio or Spanish or Econ, these probably aren’t the places for you.

I work on Wall Street and I prefer to hire smart SLAC grads of all majors and we will teach them what we want them to know. Then when the world changes and they need to adapt, they tend to be the best at doing so. Unfortunately, fewer and fewer people agree with me.

+1 IYKYK

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a valid question. They are known for being strong all around SLACs. They really aren’t known for each having a specific strength.

Agreed. You generally go to a SLAC for a well-rounded liberal arts education (which unfortunately no longer seems to be valued). Learn how to think. So though some might theoretically be better than others in particular areas, if you are going to college because you want to be 100% focused on bio or Spanish or Econ, these probably aren’t the places for you.

I work on Wall Street and I prefer to hire smart SLAC grads of all majors and we will teach them what we want them to know. Then when the world changes and they need to adapt, they tend to be the best at doing so. Unfortunately, fewer and fewer people agree with me.

People disagree because we are in an era of necessitated specialization. No longer do we need general programmers- we have AI. We need highly trained thinkers. I’ll take a kid who has actually worked on Neural networks over the Williams kid who can just rattle off about knot theory.

Another dim CS drone. And when things change in a few years the Williams kids adapts…..the other one is now basically a doorstop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not a valid question. They are known for being strong all around SLACs. They really aren’t known for each having a specific strength.

Agreed. You generally go to a SLAC for a well-rounded liberal arts education (which unfortunately no longer seems to be valued). Learn how to think. So though some might theoretically be better than others in particular areas, if you are going to college because you want to be 100% focused on bio or Spanish or Econ, these probably aren’t the places for you.

I work on Wall Street and I prefer to hire smart SLAC grads of all majors and we will teach them what we want them to know. Then when the world changes and they need to adapt, they tend to be the best at doing so. Unfortunately, fewer and fewer people agree with me.

People disagree because we are in an era of necessitated specialization. No longer do we need general programmers- we have AI. We need highly trained thinkers. I’ll take a kid who has actually worked on Neural networks over the Williams kid who can just rattle off about knot theory.

Another dim CS drone. And when things change in a few years the Williams kids adapts…..the other one is now basically a doorstop.

Wrong, so so wrong. Neural networks takes many foundational skills and ties them together. The Williams kid is drowning because they can’t catch up to the modern day algorithms and training.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

The Amherst troll emerges. They are the only thing that is ugly and mediocre in this thread.

The troll is correct about no reason to go there over some others. But the reason for the accidental correctness is that there is no qualitative differEnce between the top dozen SLACs. They are all excellent including Amherst. Find the best fit and the student will thrive and be successful.

[Anonymous]

Some of the differences have to do with distinct distribution requirements. Depending on the student's interests and strengths, this might be a factor to consider. From my research so far: Amherst is the only open curriculum WASP school. Swarthmore requires three courses in each of the three academic divisions, with 20 credits outside of the major department. Williams is also three in three. Pomona has substantial distribution requirements too, if I recall correctly. If Bowdoin is also under consideration, it's one in each of its five areas (one of which is DEI).

Swarthmore's Honors program is distinct (and impressive), though students can write senior capstones at any SLAC. Some require, some don't.

OP, if you look up major numbers for each school, you'll have a good sense of the dominant majors. This will give you at least some sense of the academic culture of the school, eg which have the more robust humanities programs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

Amherst is the number 1 lac for christs sakes!

It’s not and you have proven time and time again to be a pretty weak booster. Leave the conversation to the adults please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

Amherst is the number 1 lac for christs sakes!

#2 actually, but the Amherst troll always finds these threads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

Amherst is the number 1 lac for christs sakes!

#2 actually, but the Amherst troll always finds these threads.

Nope, number 1. Most dedicated to the liberal arts, while not just committing to corporate finance. It sets up grads for their careers rather than pushing them into consulting and IB.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

Amherst is the number 1 lac for christs sakes!

#2 actually, but the Amherst troll always finds these threads.

Nope, number 1. Most dedicated to the liberal arts, while not just committing to corporate finance. It sets up grads for their careers rather than pushing them into consulting and IB.

Please stop. You can't make up arbitrary rankings. You're not helping your cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of the differences have to do with distinct distribution requirements. Depending on the student's interests and strengths, this might be a factor to consider. From my research so far: Amherst is the only open curriculum WASP school. Swarthmore requires three courses in each of the three academic divisions, with 20 credits outside of the major department. Williams is also three in three. Pomona has substantial distribution requirements too, if I recall correctly. If Bowdoin is also under consideration, it's one in each of its five areas (one of which is DEI).

Swarthmore's Honors program is distinct (and impressive), though students can write senior capstones at any SLAC. Some require, some don't.

OP, if you look up major numbers for each school, you'll have a good sense of the dominant majors. This will give you at least some sense of the academic culture of the school, eg which have the more robust humanities programs.

Yes, I encouraged DC to think about distribution requirements. Some are definitely more onerous than others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of the differences have to do with distinct distribution requirements. Depending on the student's interests and strengths, this might be a factor to consider. From my research so far: Amherst is the only open curriculum WASP school. Swarthmore requires three courses in each of the three academic divisions, with 20 credits outside of the major department. Williams is also three in three. Pomona has substantial distribution requirements too, if I recall correctly. If Bowdoin is also under consideration, it's one in each of its five areas (one of which is DEI).

Swarthmore's Honors program is distinct (and impressive), though students can write senior capstones at any SLAC. Some require, some don't.

OP, if you look up major numbers for each school, you'll have a good sense of the dominant majors. This will give you at least some sense of the academic culture of the school, eg which have the more robust humanities programs.

Pomona only requires 6 courses in different fields, less than Williams and Swat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs.

Amherst is the number 1 lac for christs sakes!

#2 actually, but the Amherst troll always finds these threads.

Nope, number 1. Most dedicated to the liberal arts, while not just committing to corporate finance. It sets up grads for their careers rather than pushing them into consulting and IB.

Please stop. You can't make up arbitrary rankings. You're not helping your cause.

I don’t care that you can’t take the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of the differences have to do with distinct distribution requirements. Depending on the student's interests and strengths, this might be a factor to consider. From my research so far: Amherst is the only open curriculum WASP school. Swarthmore requires three courses in each of the three academic divisions, with 20 credits outside of the major department. Williams is also three in three. Pomona has substantial distribution requirements too, if I recall correctly. If Bowdoin is also under consideration, it's one in each of its five areas (one of which is DEI).

Swarthmore's Honors program is distinct (and impressive), though students can write senior capstones at any SLAC. Some require, some don't.

OP, if you look up major numbers for each school, you'll have a good sense of the dominant majors. This will give you at least some sense of the academic culture of the school, eg which have the more robust humanities programs.

Pomona only requires 6 courses in different fields, less than Williams and Swat.

You’re missing the language requirement- so 3 extra courses unless you took an AP class, so swat, Williams, and Pomona share the same requirement load. Amherst has an open curriculum which has its pros and cons.