I think the other source is based on feeder school stats, which are of course relevant to this question. Can one get into Harvard Med from Pomona? Of course. Is it more likely than gaining admission to a top West Coast feeder? No, based on the numbers. |
Agreed! You aren’t limited on where you want to go, it happens to be that people who go across the country to other states, like staying there. |
Exactly. It's a numbers game. |
Exactly, I think some people don’t get that preferences exist. It’s like saying Amherst grads are going to struggle to go to duke med, just because their students aren’t going there at the same rates. |
Not how stats works. |
Are you saying the numbers associated with feeder schools have no statistical relevance? |
You do understand that these preferences aren’t factored into admissions right? Like Harvard med doesn’t see Amherst versus Pomona and go! Oh we NEED that Amherst student. Nor does UCSF throw the Amherst app in the bin. 1/4 of a Pomona class is from California. They went to college in California for a reason, and California happens to also have one of the best medical schools in the nation. Same for many Amherst grads who want to be in New York or Boston over SF or Seattle. |
In the way you’re analyzing them, yes. They’re significant, in that, students at top lacs, given their size, go to grad schools at associated higher rates and particularly dammed good ones, no matter the lac. I doubt, if we actually had the data, that there’d be anything other than pure variation for the differences between Williams and swarthmore for med school admission, |
Are you suggesting that just because something is on the west coast, it isn’t automatically worse than an east coast choice! Sacrilege! How could that be true
|
PP wrote that Amherst, Williams, and Swarthmore are highly correlated in terms of outcome. Pomona too, just on a somewhat different feeder track. It stands to reason the statistical differences are small. |
Would you care to point out the slightest thread of evidence for this or are you just blithering? |
Still blithering…. |
Well then, we talles for no reason. I still would argue that there’s functionally no difference between these 4 and the difference in “feeder tracks” is just a condition of their locations. |
| Amherst: nothing. There's absolutely no reason to go there over WSP, or even Bowdoin and Middlebury. Ugly campus, mediocre outcomes, expensive tuition, overemphasis on DEI. Avoid at all costs. |
Wow, you’re seriously delusional if you think this is controversial. https://williamsrecord.com/463753/news/college-reckons-with-declining-interest-in-the-humanities/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://williamsrecord.com/463753/news/college-reckons-with-declining-interest-in-the-humanities/ https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2015/11/05/decline-in-humanities-majors-causes-concern-for-faculty-students/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2015/11/05/decline-in-humanities-majors-causes-concern-for-faculty-students/ https://tsl.news/news7320/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> https://tsl.news/news7320/ Read up! |