Not sure why you think this. I’m billing close to 9hr/day from 8:30-5:30, and then around 6 additional hours every week after 8:30pm if I work 2x/week post kids bedtime. Then 4 hours on the weekend. That’s 55hrs/week of billables. Even if I take 4 weeks of vacation, which I don’t do— that’s 2640 hours a year + the 6hrs per month of extra work time = 2712. Since I’m not billing every minute I’m working, my billables come out closer to 2400, with over 300 hours being non billable. The math works out pretty easily so why do you think I’m a troll? |
What’s your practice area? |
I mean I know very few practice areas where someone is able work 9 hours a day and also bill 9 full hours. Especially not on partner track, which involves business development. |
What your practice area? Where do you work now? |
Yes I’m sure your Harvard Med neighbor has an ‘average’ two bedroom house living down the street from mansions with servants. That’s definitely a typical US residential area. |
I have never seen anyone's billable requirements drop. If you take this road, you will be billing that amount of hours unless you become the rainmaker or managing partner. |
Key differentiators for me: I am WFH as my firm has no FaceTime requirement; my husband is very involved and supportive — so what you say about men with kids being able to do this is possible for me. I’m in a very busy practice group, so there’s just no downtime when it comes to billables. The math works out pretty easily per my last post, even not counting high billing days like trial + work travel (depos/hearings, where I work pretty much every minute I’m awake to maximize the time away from kids). |
| Just know that 1900 is seen as the minimum. You won't get pats on the back for consistently doing the minimum. |
People who are serious about their billables and want to have family life don't chat at work or run out for a sandwich. |
And you wear this as a badge of honor? |
My spouse is a big law partner and regularly bills 2400 or more a year. But he’s a well known workaholic and basically a billing machine. He also sees the averages and averages are all under 2K a year. Hes not a rainmaker so the fact that he is a total workhorse helps at comp time. For most people I agree that 2400 would be really hard to hit. 1900 could be okay or not depending totally on how flexible and consistent the work is. The problem is that if you have a month wheee you only hit like 125 because stuff is slow, you really need to work a lot in other months to make it up. |
Exactly. You say you bill "almost 9 hours" between 8:30 and 5:30, so that means you're basically billing from the minute you walk into the office until the minute you leave, which is very, very rare. Plus, unless you're on the West Coast, I have to point out that we are within that time frame right now so I hope you're not billing for this. Then there's the commute. |
Early retired Biglaw partner here. I agree with you 100 percent. I knew partners like your husband, and I think he and you are spot on on all counts. |
ok . . . so you're not in Biglaw then? I'm not aware of any Biglaw firm that currently allows 100 percent WFH. And if you're not Biglaw, how relevant is your experience/situation when it comes to OP? Clearly, the typical Biglaw firm has different and more complicated requirements -- billable, non-billable, facetime expectations, etc. -- than yours. OP is not going to get anywhere in her law firm not showing her face at work . . . |
Like I said, I’m WFH. Accounting for the 300 nonbillable hours from my math above is around 1.25 hours per weekday with 4 weeks of vacation that ends up nonbillable. So you are right, I am not billing the minute I am at my laptop to the minute I step away at 5:30. 20 mins of that per day is making lunch, and then an hour is probably admin work and admin emails or nonbillable work. Luckily am OOO this week at the beach so no, not billing right now though will probably work a few hours here and there so I don’t drown when I get back!
|