Where is USA headed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

[Anonymous]

Read the Bible... The end game is not a mystery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

Lol. Outside of armed MAGA, the population is out of shape, physically weak and on psych drugs.

Civil war over in a weekend.

[Anonymous]

Man, you people need to get off social media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

It won’t be like the first Civil War. Most Americans back then were subsistence farmers without modern mortgages and credit card debt. There is no way most Americans can go fight a war; they don’t have that much PTO. It will be MAGA doing terrorist attacks. They already had their first event.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not looking good until we (that is, the powers that be) decide that human life is more valuable than money.

Just curious..... do you support abortion?

Just curious…do you know the difference between an embryo and a 3 year old?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

Lol. Outside of armed MAGA, the population is out of shape, physically weak and on psych drugs.

Civil war over in a weekend.

Have you ever seen a maga rally? Outside of a few proud boys scrolling Grindr, maga is pathetic and weak, and they’ve proven again and again and again (and again) that they are cowards. Nobody is afraid of the lame incels and meal team six rednecks anymore.

HOWEVER, I was referring to states that would tell the Feds to suck it. How many people in the military, national guard, police forces, etc, do you really think are going to follow fascists into battle if push comes to shove?

Throw in the fact that maga is small compared to the overall population and what there is of maga (as mentioned) is laughable as a force, you might be right that it would be over quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

Lol. Outside of armed MAGA, the population is out of shape, physically weak and on psych drugs.

Civil war over in a weekend.

Have you ever seen a maga rally? Outside of a few proud boys scrolling Grindr, maga is pathetic and weak, and they’ve proven again and again and again (and again) that they are cowards. Nobody is afraid of the lame incels and meal team six rednecks anymore.

HOWEVER, I was referring to states that would tell the Feds to suck it. How many people in the military, national guard, police forces, etc, do you really think are going to follow fascists into battle if push comes to shove?

Throw in the fact that maga is small compared to the overall population and what there is of maga (as mentioned) is laughable as a force, you might be right that it would be over quickly.

White marxist libs have been shoved into a corner with their piles of aborted babies and psych drugs. It's a shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

It won’t be like the first Civil War. Most Americans back then were subsistence farmers without modern mortgages and credit card debt. There is no way most Americans can go fight a war; they don’t have that much PTO. It will be MAGA doing terrorist attacks. They already had their first event.

I think that it would be re-organized forces supplemented by volunteers. Regular people that were involved would just manufacture goods or live lives as best they can. People living under oppression would do the best they can and good ones would sabotage efforts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

Lol. Outside of armed MAGA, the population is out of shape, physically weak and on psych drugs.

Civil war over in a weekend.

Have you ever seen a maga rally? Outside of a few proud boys scrolling Grindr, maga is pathetic and weak, and they’ve proven again and again and again (and again) that they are cowards. Nobody is afraid of the lame incels and meal team six rednecks anymore.

HOWEVER, I was referring to states that would tell the Feds to suck it. How many people in the military, national guard, police forces, etc, do you really think are going to follow fascists into battle if push comes to shove?

Throw in the fact that maga is small compared to the overall population and what there is of maga (as mentioned) is laughable as a force, you might be right that it would be over quickly.

White marxist libs have been shoved into a corner with their piles of aborted babies and psych drugs. It's a shame.

See? MAGA is a joke. Wars are logistical battles. Can you imagine this paste eater trying to participate? Lolololol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

Lol. Outside of armed MAGA, the population is out of shape, physically weak and on psych drugs.

Civil war over in a weekend.

Have you ever seen a maga rally? Outside of a few proud boys scrolling Grindr, maga is pathetic and weak, and they’ve proven again and again and again (and again) that they are cowards. Nobody is afraid of the lame incels and meal team six rednecks anymore.

HOWEVER, I was referring to states that would tell the Feds to suck it. How many people in the military, national guard, police forces, etc, do you really think are going to follow fascists into battle if push comes to shove?

Throw in the fact that maga is small compared to the overall population and what there is of maga (as mentioned) is laughable as a force, you might be right that it would be over quickly.

White marxist libs have been shoved into a corner with their piles of aborted babies and psych drugs. It's a shame.

See? MAGA is a joke. Wars are logistical battles. Can you imagine this paste eater trying to participate? Lolololol.

Oh no here comes the USS Harvey milk with its pussy hats!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slow civil war. Not like the 1861-1865 version. More like the Sunni/Shiite conflicts in the Middle East. Political violence, bombings, assasinations. Stalemated political situation with Red and Blue alternating narrow national victories, leading to national decline relative to China.

We are now in a cold civil war, no doubt. All this bizarre talk of invading cities and nationalizing NYC or DC might set off the hot war if they actually try it.

Lol. Outside of armed MAGA, the population is out of shape, physically weak and on psych drugs.

Civil war over in a weekend.

Have you ever seen a maga rally? Outside of a few proud boys scrolling Grindr, maga is pathetic and weak, and they’ve proven again and again and again (and again) that they are cowards. Nobody is afraid of the lame incels and meal team six rednecks anymore.

HOWEVER, I was referring to states that would tell the Feds to suck it. How many people in the military, national guard, police forces, etc, do you really think are going to follow fascists into battle if push comes to shove?

Throw in the fact that maga is small compared to the overall population and what there is of maga (as mentioned) is laughable as a force, you might be right that it would be over quickly.

White marxist libs have been shoved into a corner with their piles of aborted babies and psych drugs. It's a shame.

See? MAGA is a joke. Wars are logistical battles. Can you imagine this paste eater trying to participate? Lolololol.

No, those babies you see are the ones who had their food assistance cut bc feeding poor live children is too woke for you. Congrats on greatness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you think it will be like in the country for the next decade? Climate deniers, health care vaccine deniers, data deniers. Add the type of deniers you have seen or you predict will emerge within the next 10 years. People from other countries and/or if you have lived extensively elsewhere : can you draw correlations to what you have seen in a different country, and if you have kids, do you advise your kid to move to the country from where you moved to the US even if the kid has never visited or lived in that country? Should people try to move to ...I don't know ...Mars?

Data deniers? That’s funny. Part of what we’re seeing is the use of big data by the Rs and Ds to identify and target increasingly refined subsets of people so that they can effectively message to them (read - activate people’s tribal instincts to separate into us v them / insider v outsider groups) and, therefore, build their pre-election coalitions of such groups under their respective tents.

In the short term, I think you’ll see the parties shift quickly (or more quickly than previously) between elections to refine their messaging and therefore coalitions. For example, the Rs will move on from MAGA identity / messaging quickly once it isn’t effective. They are already testing what their next “brand” will be.

Just beyond that, I think people will realize they’re being played / activated and that their “political identity” is simply one of many identities that they have, and will revert to the pragmatic wisdom of the past—refrain from talking about divisive topics like politics or religion in polite company; realize that people are more interesting than their politics or religion; realize you can be friends with folks that have different political or religious beliefs based on other shared interests (e.g., playing sports or other activities, non-political advocacy like rescuing animals). Pendulum swings back to folks being mostly polite because the alternative is to be a constantly activated nincompoop that is always looking to fight, and most people really don’t want to live that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The super wealthy are preparing to move to Mars, but unfortunately, they’ll only do it after they’ve killed off the rest of us by destroying everything on earth for their own profit.

They’re building walnut paneled, professionally decorated bunkers in New Zealand for a less severe disaster scenario.

I’m not kidding. Unless you’re a billionaire, you are not part of the class that will survive anything. Vote accordingly.

Are you buddies with the Comet Pizza conspiracy theorists?

A conspiracy simply means people are conspiring. That is absolutely happening. It's not a theory. Billionaires are in fact buying bunkers and making plans to leave the planet. Billionaires are aware that their money-making activities are destroying the planet and will make it unsirvivable if they do not reverse course. Billionaires have in fact decided not to reverse course, but instead, to abandon us to their mess. This is not theory, it is what is happening before our eyes.

LOL, leave the planet and go where exactly? There's currently no long term habitable place outside the Earth. Maybe one day, but not now or for the foreseeable future.

This is simply delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The super wealthy are preparing to move to Mars, but unfortunately, they’ll only do it after they’ve killed off the rest of us by destroying everything on earth for their own profit.

They’re building walnut paneled, professionally decorated bunkers in New Zealand for a less severe disaster scenario.

I’m not kidding. Unless you’re a billionaire, you are not part of the class that will survive anything. Vote accordingly.

Are you buddies with the Comet Pizza conspiracy theorists?

DP. You haven’t heard of the luxury bunkers in NZ? Thiel is planning his final days there. Well, buddy if your paranoid @ss didn’t mean you have to screw out the country with Vance to destroy he government and the planet, then you could live above ground and breathe natural air. He’s a freak, look at his last interview where he can’t decide if the human race should survive. WTF!

https://www.vice.com/en/article/billionaires-are-building-luxury-bunkers-to-escape-doomsday/

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/18/peter-thiel-refused-consent-for-sprawling-lodge-in-new-zealand-local-council

https://theconversation.com/billionaires-are-building-bunkers-and-buying-islands-but-are-they-prepping-for-the-apocalypse-or-pioneering-a-new-feudalism-223987