The stupidity of American vehicles.

[Anonymous]

Ok, so if I get a CDL then that means people like you have to STFU?

I’m in like Jeff Gillooly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Common sense tells you not to walk in front of any vehicle unless you can see the driver. I’m sure there are cameras and sensors as well.

This means we have to completely eliminate front tinted windows.
There are so many illegal ones out there where you can't see the driver.

WHY DOES THIS NOT GET MORE ATTENTION

[Anonymous]

Wow! I am surprised at how narrow minded city people are! We have a truck for towing our horses, hauling round bales and other stuff. For city people, yes our truck will be spotless when you encounter it. They are too expensive to trash.

The dems in Congress made trucks and SUVs a great write off to gain UAW support! Section 179 is just a regular tax law! None of the city folks on here own a business!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is absurd and needs to be banned:





The best part are the clowns driving these $90k monstrosities claiming they need it to haul stuff even though 99% of the time you always see these types of trucks in absolute prestine condition. They didn't need these behemoths back in the 70s or 80s. The size of US vehicles is absolutely out of control, and they're killing more people than ever before. Literally zero good reasons for these stupidly sized trucks and SUVs. They only exist because the car industry lobbies Congress to allow loopholes for these stupid vehicles so they're not regulated as commercial trucks where you'd need a CDL to drive them. Enough is enough. Banish these awful vehicles to hell where they belong.

Toyota and Nissan sell pick ups that are just as big. Why leave those out of your crazy rant?

Democrats need the UAWs support! Without they will always lose elections. Therefore Democrats support tax incentives for big trucks and SUVs!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I am surprised at how narrow minded city people are! We have a truck for towing our horses, hauling round bales and other stuff. For city people, yes our truck will be spotless when you encounter it. They are too expensive to trash.

The dems in Congress made trucks and SUVs a great write off to gain UAW support! Section 179 is just a regular tax law! None of the city folks on here own a business!

99.9% of suburbanites aren't hauling haybales nor are towing livestock. 99.9% of people are driving these dumbass vehicles to go to Costco, Home Goods, Target, Starbucks and the local McDonald's. Because a story exists that's probably 2-3 standard deviations from the norm doesn't really add much to the overall point that most of America lives in the city and burbs and are driving all of these stupidly sized cars that are completely unnecessary and are killing too many people. And all to line the pockets of automakers. Somehow 3 billion people from Europe to Asia are capable of having families, sports practices and haul around stuff, yet don't need stupidly sized vehicles to survive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I am surprised at how narrow minded city people are! We have a truck for towing our horses, hauling round bales and other stuff. For city people, yes our truck will be spotless when you encounter it. They are too expensive to trash.

The dems in Congress made trucks and SUVs a great write off to gain UAW support! Section 179 is just a regular tax law! None of the city folks on here own a business!

99.9% of suburbanites aren't hauling haybales nor are towing livestock. 99.9% of people are driving these dumbass vehicles to go to Costco, Home Goods, Target, Starbucks and the local McDonald's. Because a story exists that's probably 2-3 standard deviations from the norm doesn't really add much to the overall point that most of America lives in the city and burbs and are driving all of these stupidly sized cars that are completely unnecessary and are killing too many people. And all to line the pockets of automakers. Somehow 3 billion people from Europe to Asia are capable of having families, sports practices and haul around stuff, yet don't need stupidly sized vehicles to survive.

I guess no tradesmen or sportsmen live in the suburbs anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is absurd and needs to be banned:





The best part are the clowns driving these $90k monstrosities claiming they need it to haul stuff even though 99% of the time you always see these types of trucks in absolute prestine condition. They didn't need these behemoths back in the 70s or 80s. The size of US vehicles is absolutely out of control, and they're killing more people than ever before. Literally zero good reasons for these stupidly sized trucks and SUVs. They only exist because the car industry lobbies Congress to allow loopholes for these stupid vehicles so they're not regulated as commercial trucks where you'd need a CDL to drive them. Enough is enough. Banish these awful vehicles to hell where they belong.

Toyota and Nissan sell pick ups that are just as big. Why leave those out of your crazy rant?

That appears to be an HD pickup, which Nissan and Toyota don’t sell. It’s not that much bigger than the ones they do sell however.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I am surprised at how narrow minded city people are! We have a truck for towing our horses, hauling round bales and other stuff. For city people, yes our truck will be spotless when you encounter it. They are too expensive to trash.

The dems in Congress made trucks and SUVs a great write off to gain UAW support! Section 179 is just a regular tax law! None of the city folks on here own a business!

99.9% of suburbanites aren't hauling haybales nor are towing livestock. 99.9% of people are driving these dumbass vehicles to go to Costco, Home Goods, Target, Starbucks and the local McDonald's. Because a story exists that's probably 2-3 standard deviations from the norm doesn't really add much to the overall point that most of America lives in the city and burbs and are driving all of these stupidly sized cars that are completely unnecessary and are killing too many people. And all to line the pockets of automakers. Somehow 3 billion people from Europe to Asia are capable of having families, sports practices and haul around stuff, yet don't need stupidly sized vehicles to survive.

I guess no tradesmen or sportsmen live in the suburbs anymore.

I guess no trades people live in Europe all the way to Japan. Oh wait, that's right, they do, and almost none of them use these stupidly sized trucks. In fact, they often drive vans.

[Anonymous]

Trump announced all cds drivers must read English moron maga thinks he established that law he did not

The law requiring CDL drivers to speak and read English sufficiently to converse with the public was established in July 1937 with the establishment of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). Specifically, it's found in 49 CFR §391.11(b)(2). This rule has been in place for decades, with inspectors citing drivers for violations and placing them out of service

Dam fools cult of stupidity

As a person who has owned many trucks for Horse trailering yes the US could benefit from Japanese safety technology

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, infrastructure isn't built for them. Road surfaces degrade faster. Highway guardrails can't keep them from careening off a cliff. And even when there's no cliff, the guardrails are damaged beyond use when one of these monster trucks hits them, instead of just being scuffed/ dented.

Cars should be taxed by size/ weight, and the rates should be sharply progressive. If you insist on driving around in one of these dicks-on-wheels, you should pay A LOT to compensate the rest of us for the damage you're causing.

100% this.

[Anonymous]

I feel like if you can afford multiple horses and multiple horse trailers, then you can afford to have a smaller car for your day to day driving and use your giant truck just for hauling horses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, infrastructure isn't built for them. Road surfaces degrade faster. Highway guardrails can't keep them from careening off a cliff. And even when there's no cliff, the guardrails are damaged beyond use when one of these monster trucks hits them, instead of just being scuffed/ dented.

Cars should be taxed by size/ weight, and the rates should be sharply progressive. If you insist on driving around in one of these dicks-on-wheels, you should pay A LOT to compensate the rest of us for the damage you're causing.

100% this.

Why not add gas mileage to the mix?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel like if you can afford multiple horses and multiple horse trailers, then you can afford to have a smaller car for your day to day driving and use your giant truck just for hauling horses.

Another silly comment. Shows you do not have teenagers on your insurance! Or horses!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow! I am surprised at how narrow minded city people are! We have a truck for towing our horses, hauling round bales and other stuff. For city people, yes our truck will be spotless when you encounter it. They are too expensive to trash.

The dems in Congress made trucks and SUVs a great write off to gain UAW support! Section 179 is just a regular tax law! None of the city folks on here own a business!

99.9% of suburbanites aren't hauling haybales nor are towing livestock. 99.9% of people are driving these dumbass vehicles to go to Costco, Home Goods, Target, Starbucks and the local McDonald's. Because a story exists that's probably 2-3 standard deviations from the norm doesn't really add much to the overall point that most of America lives in the city and burbs and are driving all of these stupidly sized cars that are completely unnecessary and are killing too many people. And all to line the pockets of automakers. Somehow 3 billion people from Europe to Asia are capable of having families, sports practices and haul around stuff, yet don't need stupidly sized vehicles to survive.

I guess no tradesmen or sportsmen live in the suburbs anymore.

I guess no trades people live in Europe all the way to Japan. Oh wait, that's right, they do, and almost none of them use these stupidly sized trucks. In fact, they often drive vans.

Back to what is offered in America. Only two small pickups - the Maverick and Santa Cruz, which are both great but don’t safely fit everyone’s work or lifestyle needs.

Europe and Japan have different offerings. Plenty of Americans choose vans but they are not any smaller than the trucks you’re so offended by, are LESS safe and they don’t allow cross-use, like serving as a family vehicle.

Why don’t you just say you hate tradesmen… that theyre beneath you - stop explaining to others how they should manage their lives.

[Anonymous]

Every Farrier I've met from Europe owns a Full size American truck! Have never seen one with a van from Europe. Why???