Publishing high school research

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the kid is good, I'd try a pop sience ones, like Science or Nature. These have some level of scrutiny behind them and they don't care the age of the submitter. It does need to be peer reviewed though. They both have large readership.

A high schooler is not going to get a paper into Science or Nature, wtf.

[Anonymous]

I am posting this here because I found it in a giant document sent to me by a $$$ college counselor a few years ago.

I don't have any STEM kids left in the house (only humanities) so I want to pay it forward - like this site helped me a few years ago - it used to be a place to share with each other (and learn from one another)!! Hopefully others will continue that tradition.

https://www.youngscientistjournal.org/
https://cusjcolumbiascientist.weebly.com/
https://www.pghr.org/
https://emerginginvestigators.org/

Other things of interest:
https://glohea.org/
http://www.aysi.org/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the kid is good, I'd try a pop sience ones, like Science or Nature. These have some level of scrutiny behind them and they don't care the age of the submitter. It does need to be peer reviewed though. They both have large readership.

A high schooler is not going to get a paper into Science or Nature, wtf.

No kidding. PP is clueless. The two most famous science journals have “some level of scrutiny…” ?! Getting published in those is what career researchers with PhDs aspire to.

I think the overwhelming majority of high school published research is BS that a decent adcom sees through. It should be more common just to have a faculty member look at an academic work sample, imo.