The power of the law rests entirely on the power to apply the law. There are endless laws that aren't really enforced because no one wants to bother enforcing them or it's not politically convenient to enforce them. Then there are laws that are utilized to be used in areas it never was really meant to serve but it works because the power to enforce it is there. Some of the Trump prosecutions in New York rested on this approach, which caused even legal analysts at CNN and MSNBC News to be hesitant about how novel it was. Just look at how the judge in the Trump trial directed the jury to find him guilty by setting the terminology that kinda made the jury to find him guilty, and then in the sentencing effectively cancelled everything despite a guilty verdict. Because he knew he'd lost the power when a much larger and serious jury found Trump innocent, aka the American electorate. It's all about the power to enforce the law and the mandate behind that power. Right now the Democrats don't have the power to enforce what laws may exist to slow down some of the EOs without trying to go through the courts, but the courts also have to find leverage to enforce their ruling, if they agree with the people bringing forward the suits. People know the Trump administration will fight back and escalate to a court that finds in their favor until it ends at the SCOTUS. Clutching on to the "law" as if it was a final arbitrator beyond reproach is missing entirely how laws operate. People may find out that the "law" may not agree with them because the ultimate court in America may rule differently. But I suspect that still wouldn't change their feelings on the lawfulness of the behavior. |
Yes, I don’t understand this either. Before the inauguration, people kept saying that DOGE was not government. So naive, unfortunately! |
Get help. Seriously. |
Everything OP wrote is completely true. So what help do you suggest he or she get? |
| It's all meant to provoke so Musk can declare Martial Law. |