Four years. |
The chances of "getting an honors slot out of a firm" are actually zero. HP attorneys are right out of law school or clerkship. If you have worked anywhere previously, you are not an HP candidate. You would be hired as a lateral. You would not be an HP hire. |
Do you know anything about what happens at DOJ in Republican administrations? |
| The clerkships “rule” of not turning down an offer is unique to clerkships - that rule was in place when I clerked in the 1990s. That said, someone might remember at DOJ but it might also be understandable given current situation. I think you can turn down unless you’ve already accepted and been through a high level clearance background check. Those are really expensive and people get mad when people bail after those. Doesn’t sound like that’s what he’s applying for though. |
Is there going to be a sea change in bankruptcy, tort, IP, national security …? Sure, civil rights, but that’s a small part of DOJ. |
| Unless your child has poop for brains, they should get the DOJ Honors program on their resume. Sounds like your kid could be qualified for DOJ’s SO or at least appellate program, which is a step towards the most prestigious and interesting legal jobs in the country. They should already know this. |
| PS And yes, I was an Assisrant Director in a litigating component of DOJ thru red and blue admins. |
+1. I wonder if OP’s kid goes to Columbia. Columbia is so focused on Wall Street that it doesn’t spend the kind of effort prepping students for clerkship and fellowships/honors like Harvard or Yale does. |
+1 I'm a former fed with similar credentials. DOJ is going to be destroyed this time, much worse than the first Adm. It's so sad to say this but I wouldn't recommend this path for him now. Go to a firm and apply for a job at DOJ in a few yrs. He will still have a great shot with his resume. If this were like a Jeb Bush administration, sure! Move past the partisan differences. But the issue now is much bigger - feds are going to be treated very poorly in the hopes they leave or just straight up fired, which is easiest when they are new. |
You are wrong. Lawyers in other divisions were pressed into working on immigration cases in the Trump years. |
I assure you that NSD will be impacted. |
Ok well, that’s actually helping to clear the immigration backlog. That’s not terrible. Plus it’s not like Obama and Biden had stellar progressive records on immigrant detention and deportation. If you think no immigrants should be detained or deported you probably shouldn’t work for DOJ as a prosecutor or in immigration at all. I’m sure I could have gotten hired as a prosecutor but I never tried because I personally don’t want to send people to jail. This has little to do with the administration but rather working as a prosecutor whenever. |
Sure but substantively differently? Did Biden and Obama not go after spies, international crime, etc? Sure there are some high profile areas that are more political but lots that are not. But whatever. This kid can take the absolutely most risk averse approach and go on the grind doing doc review defending KBR or helping insurance companies merge at Biglaw instead. |
No. It will not be "destroyed." And what is this "go to a firm" stuff where you claim "he will still have a great shot with his resume." What are you on about? No one has a "great shot" at DOJ, it is one of the hardest legal jobs to get, if not the hardest, and there is a huge abount of luck and timing involved. And most are applying from "a firm." OP, this person doesn't know what they are talking about. I'm guessing this "I'm a former fed with similar credentials" means they worked as a paralegal for a year at the Dept of Education or some such nonsense. |
Reread OP. Their kid is looking as US Trustee or Commercial branch. I’d take high end big law or a lot boutique over those. As someone who had better credentials than OP’s kid and chose not to do honors program, I’m glad I chose big law to start. |