|
If you are still monitoring this thread, I think something like these with the right shoes and accessories would work well in the burgundy color, and it’s something you could throw blazer or matching duster over to make it suitable for the office so it doesn’t just sit in your closet:
https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/product/demetra-dress/122759.html?dwvar_122759_color=33421 https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/product/sculpt-knit-section-dress/114564024.html The material is good for a day wedding, the color and off-the-shoulder elements make it festive for a November wedding along with fun jewelry, shoes, and handbag. And you won’t freeze. |
Neither of those are ball gowns. But OP, you do not want to wear either of those (horribly ugly) things for a 3pm wedding -- not appropriate. |
That is a beautiful dress on the right person, but that kind of cut looks like a sack on many body types. |
Which dresses are you calling ugly? Hard to tell. Curious. |
75 YO women don't wear $800 pumps. |
|
I like the first one. |
It looks like a bathrobe. |
Who is wearing this an afternoon wedding?! |
| Maybe the first one, but the second one seems too dressy for a restaurant reception where its cocktails and tapas, which to me implies informality |
Since you say that there will be tapas, I will assume that the one Mediterranean country is Spain. What about the other? If it is something like Greece or Lebanon, I think you are overestimating how conservative the dress will be. A 4PM wedding will likely still be going strong into the wee morning hours for folks from these countries, and the women do not dress "demurely". There will be sparkle, shine, fierceness. Throw out your notions of "DCUM appropriate" (i.e. boring AF) and have fun! |
I didn't think so. Not even for the more dowdy DC weddings I've been to. 3 or 4 pm is a common wedding time and guests often dress up. |