Angelina Jolie new Boyfriend?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was there with his GF. So either she's in a throuple or they're just friends.

His GF better look out. AJ loves the ego boost of being the other woman who takes the guy from his wife/girlfriend . . .

She is 49 now, past it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

She's always photographed wearing a trench coat. She's got black ones, camel-colored ones, long-sleeved, short-sleeved. It's her security blanket.

The gold sack dress is awful! It looks like a dress for a lounge act.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

Because she's emaciated and has unsightly big veins all over her arms and legs. Dress was nice but she should have worn gloves, a glamorous updo, and better makeup. She looks like a frail wraith, about to keel over.

She does not embody Callas in any way, shape or form. She's way too cold and reserved. Callas had a big bold effusive diva personality. Jolie can do intense and imperious but can't inhabit that kind of larger-than-life personality. Bad casting.

The producers released a clip from the Maria movie and she doesn’t nail Maria Callas’ accent and personality at all. She’s a terrible actress who can only play herself. The movie is getting poor reviews as well. It’s probably another bomb for her.

Lady Gaga should have played Maria Callas.

Maybe in a normal biopic, but Larrin's biopic aren't normal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

Because she's emaciated and has unsightly big veins all over her arms and legs. Dress was nice but she should have worn gloves, a glamorous updo, and better makeup. She looks like a frail wraith, about to keel over.

If you look at Jennifer Aniston untouched photos she also has veiny arms.

Veiny hands and feet, not arms. Completely different ballpark.

Look at third pic right arm

https://people.com/jennifer-aniston-gets-oil-thrown-on-her-while-filming-the-morning-show-8685530

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

Because she's emaciated and has unsightly big veins all over her arms and legs. Dress was nice but she should have worn gloves, a glamorous updo, and better makeup. She looks like a frail wraith, about to keel over.

Gross
If you look at Jennifer Aniston untouched photos she also has veiny arms.

Veiny hands and feet, not arms. Completely different ballpark.

Look at third pic right arm

https://people.com/jennifer-aniston-gets-oil-thrown-on-her-while-filming-the-morning-show-8685530

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

Because she's emaciated and has unsightly big veins all over her arms and legs. Dress was nice but she should have worn gloves, a glamorous updo, and better makeup. She looks like a frail wraith, about to keel over.

She does not embody Callas in any way, shape or form. She's way too cold and reserved. Callas had a big bold effusive diva personality. Jolie can do intense and imperious but can't inhabit that kind of larger-than-life personality. Bad casting.

The producers released a clip from the Maria movie and she doesn’t nail Maria Callas’ accent and personality at all. She’s a terrible actress who can only play herself. The movie is getting poor reviews as well. It’s probably another bomb for her.

Lady Gaga should have played Maria Callas.

Maybe in a normal biopic, but Larrin's biopic aren't normal.

Sabrina Imbracciatore looks a lot like Callas, would have been a more interesting choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was there with his GF. So either she's in a throuple or they're just friends.

His GF better look out. AJ loves the ego boost of being the other woman who takes the guy from his wife/girlfriend . . .

She’s been single for a decade now. Married men must not be reacting to her advances. I don’t think anyone significant, like BBT or Brad, would consider leaving their significant others for her today.

She's been in menopause since she hit 40 years old. I suspect that has a lot to do with it. Most post menopausal women have less of a sex drive.

[Anonymous]

She comes across as a deeply self-centered person in her new interview. Always in pain, always suffering, always the victim. Suffered betrayals, only one friend stood by the family "in their hour of need." Yeah because everyone, including her lawyer, thought her desire to cut out her kid's father was harmful to the family. She suffered making this film, but her kids took care of her. Because that's their job, treating her like the vulnerable child? Gah. Was this interview supposed to help her Oscar campaign?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/angelina-jolie-interview-maria-without-blood-hiatus-1235987297/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pitt has been dating for years. This is not a response to his having a GF.

+1
Ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

Yes Brad has dated. But this is the first time he’s had a steady GF and for quite some time now.

This is not serious. He's been vacationing all over Europe without her. She seems to have made one appearance and that's it. She's a cover for whatever he's really up to.

She's there for Venice. So either he's genuinely into her or wants to annoy Jolie. Or both.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13799439/Brad-Pitt-girlfriend-Ines-Ramon-Venice-Film-Festival.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She comes across as a deeply self-centered person in her new interview. Always in pain, always suffering, always the victim. Suffered betrayals, only one friend stood by the family "in their hour of need." Yeah because everyone, including her lawyer, thought her desire to cut out her kid's father was harmful to the family. She suffered making this film, but her kids took care of her. Because that's their job, treating her like the vulnerable child? Gah. Was this interview supposed to help her Oscar campaign?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/angelina-jolie-interview-maria-without-blood-hiatus-1235987297/

She is insufferable. She has no humility or self-awareness. And she has a massive victimhood complex. She is a perpetual victim in her own mind. She never takes any responsibility for her actions that have fractured her family and caused trauma for her children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pitt has been dating for years. This is not a response to his having a GF.

+1
Ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

Yes Brad has dated. But this is the first time he’s had a steady GF and for quite some time now.

This is not serious. He's been vacationing all over Europe without her. She seems to have made one appearance and that's it. She's a cover for whatever he's really up to.

She's there for Venice. So either he's genuinely into her or wants to annoy Jolie. Or both.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13799439/Brad-Pitt-girlfriend-Ines-Ramon-Venice-Film-Festival.html

She’s is there with him in Venice, and she’s been spending time with him at Chateau Miraval as well.

Ines looks great and Brad looks happy with her. Angelina is now as ugly on the outside as she is on the inside and Brad is well rid of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

She's always photographed wearing a trench coat. She's got black ones, camel-colored ones, long-sleeved, short-sleeved. It's her security blanket.

The gold sack dress is awful! It looks like a dress for a lounge act.

m

She emaciated, bony and veiny. She hides her body and wears padding to avoid showing how bad and unhealthy she looks. Her skin even looks unhealthy. The blonde hair washes her out. She looks bad and unwell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She comes across as a deeply self-centered person in her new interview. Always in pain, always suffering, always the victim. Suffered betrayals, only one friend stood by the family "in their hour of need." Yeah because everyone, including her lawyer, thought her desire to cut out her kid's father was harmful to the family. She suffered making this film, but her kids took care of her. Because that's their job, treating her like the vulnerable child? Gah. Was this interview supposed to help her Oscar campaign?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/angelina-jolie-interview-maria-without-blood-hiatus-1235987297/

She is insufferable. She has no humility or self-awareness. And she has a massive victimhood complex. She is a perpetual victim in her own mind. She never takes any responsibility for her actions that have fractured her family and caused trauma for her children.

Whoa, this interview was bad. Really bad. She does not come off well at all. She seems like someone who cuts off anyone who doesn't tell her what she wants to hear. I'm genuinely curious about how she navigates parenting young adults beginning to form their own opinions. At some point a few will have to see through her mommy martyr nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does she cover her entire body when she dresses?! Has anyone seen her in shorts in the last 10 years?

She's always photographed wearing a trench coat. She's got black ones, camel-colored ones, long-sleeved, short-sleeved. It's her security blanket.

The gold sack dress is awful! It looks like a dress for a lounge act.

m

She emaciated, bony and veiny. She hides her body and wears padding to avoid showing how bad and unhealthy she looks. Her skin even looks unhealthy. The blonde hair washes her out. She looks bad and unwell.

I think she's still beautiful but too thin. I love her highlighted hair..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She comes across as a deeply self-centered person in her new interview. Always in pain, always suffering, always the victim. Suffered betrayals, only one friend stood by the family "in their hour of need." Yeah because everyone, including her lawyer, thought her desire to cut out her kid's father was harmful to the family. She suffered making this film, but her kids took care of her. Because that's their job, treating her like the vulnerable child? Gah. Was this interview supposed to help her Oscar campaign?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/angelina-jolie-interview-maria-without-blood-hiatus-1235987297/

She is insufferable. She has no humility or self-awareness. And she has a massive victimhood complex. She is a perpetual victim in her own mind. She never takes any responsibility for her actions that have fractured her family and caused trauma for her children.

Agree. The kids would have bounced back just fine from one horrible day where their father had some kind of psychotic break--if she had simply permitted and encouraged it. He got sober and fought hard to be present in their lives, spending millions on legal fees and therapy bills. She reinforced and deepened their fear and anxiety instead of helping them heal and move forward with some kind of positive relationship with the man whose parenting she praised to the heavens for a number of years. That is abysmal parenting. Seems like the older girl is building her own life in college. Hope the rest can too at some point.