Michelle would have been such a better candidate

[Anonymous]

She is an amazing and inspiring speaker. She's not a politician, and she doesn't want to be one. Frankly, I think that's why she moves people. But I think she played exactly the right role.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She'd be a great candidate! I think what we've learned over the last month is that it turns out we have a DEEP bench of great people over on our side. We are rich in talent, these days.

Harris, it turns out, is also a great candidate! Made all the stronger with Walz by her side.

+1

[Anonymous]

I voted for Obama twice, for perspective.

Now. Would someone who knows please inform us if Michelle has ever represented or worked on the side of the opioid pharma companies?

[Anonymous]

Someone who adamantly doesn’t want a job really isn’t a “better candidate “.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than being first lady, she's never held a significant public office. I think she's a great public speaker and person but Harris is much more qualified.

Name three of Kamala’s top accomplishments.

Vice President
Senator, CA
2017–2021
Attorney General of California
2011–2017
District Attorney of San Francisco
2004–2011

Accomplishments by Office:

California Attorney General: https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/what-to-know-about-kamala-harris-record-as-california-attorney-general/
California Senator: https://voteview.com/person/41701/kamala-devi-harris
VP (Tie-breaking Votes Cast in the Senate): https://ballotpedia.org/Tie-breaking_votes_cast_by_Kamala_Harris_in_the_U.S._Senate

She spent most of her time as Attorney General putting Black people in prison on marijuana charges.

I guess you didn’t watch the DNC or check the actual data. DL Hughley’s public apology for believing and spreading crap, like your uninformed comment might educate you. If not, watching it will at least balance out your divisive trolling.

Funny, a post that on the surface seems complimentary, is really becoming quite divisive — pitting people’s impressions of one accomplished woman against another, and continuing this anti-Harris crap without data and without describing the groundbreaking programs that Kamala implemented to reduce recidivism and increase employment.

[Anonymous]

A thought it was curious that Michelle said her parents were skeptical of people who wanted to much.

What happened to her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than being first lady, she's never held a significant public office. I think she's a great public speaker and person but Harris is much more qualified.

Name three of Kamala’s top accomplishments.

Vice President
Senator, CA
2017–2021
Attorney General of California
2011–2017
District Attorney of San Francisco
2004–2011

Accomplishments by Office:

California Attorney General: https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/what-to-know-about-kamala-harris-record-as-california-attorney-general/
California Senator: https://voteview.com/person/41701/kamala-devi-harris
VP (Tie-breaking Votes Cast in the Senate): https://ballotpedia.org/Tie-breaking_votes_cast_by_Kamala_Harris_in_the_U.S._Senate

She spent most of her time as Attorney General putting Black people in prison on marijuana charges.

So doing one of the jobs for which she was elected? I would be she put white people in jail for the same thing. And Asians too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What practical executive or legislative experience does she have that you can point to?

She made a good speech and has several times. Biden makes crappy speeches but he has been a great president.

Democrats are obsessed with electing presidents based on who they are married to- if a woman is married to a former president, she instantly becomes qualified to be president. It’s so odd. Strong independent intelligent women who are the most qualified to run the world only because they sleep with a man who got elected lol sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A thought it was curious that Michelle said her parents were skeptical of people who wanted to much.

What happened to her?

What happened to her is that —unlike her parents — she grew up benefitting from the gains of the civil rights movement.
You’re genuinely surprised that deeply embedded racial segregation impacts someone’s outlook on life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than being first lady, she's never held a significant public office. I think she's a great public speaker and person but Harris is much more qualified.

Name three of Kamala’s top accomplishments.

Vice President
Senator, CA
2017–2021
Attorney General of California
2011–2017
District Attorney of San Francisco
2004–2011

Accomplishments by Office:

California Attorney General: https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/what-to-know-about-kamala-harris-record-as-california-attorney-general/
California Senator: https://voteview.com/person/41701/kamala-devi-harris
VP (Tie-breaking Votes Cast in the Senate): https://ballotpedia.org/Tie-breaking_votes_cast_by_Kamala_Harris_in_the_U.S._Senate

She spent most of her time as Attorney General putting Black people in prison on marijuana charges.

And admitting she was smoking loud while putting black ppl on prison for the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What practical executive or legislative experience does she have that you can point to?

She made a good speech and has several times. Biden makes crappy speeches but he has been a great president.

Democrats are obsessed with electing presidents based on who they are married to- if a woman is married to a former president, she instantly becomes qualified to be president. It’s so odd. Strong independent intelligent women who are the most qualified to run the world only because they sleep with a man who got elected lol sure.

There are Trump supporters who want Alina Hanna in some position of authority. For the stated reason of her looks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What practical executive or legislative experience does she have that you can point to?

She made a good speech and has several times. Biden makes crappy speeches but he has been a great president.

Democrats are obsessed with electing presidents based on who they are married to- if a woman is married to a former president, she instantly becomes qualified to be president. It’s so odd. Strong independent intelligent women who are the most qualified to run the world only because they sleep with a man who got elected lol sure.

There are Trump supporters who want Alina Hanna in some position of authority. For the stated reason of her looks.

Democrats ran Hillary “my turn” Clinton, and have asked Michelle Obama to run for president so many times (and she’s said no every time) that it’s giving desperate stalker.

Democrats want to get around the rule of a person only allowed to be elected president twice by electing the wives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What practical executive or legislative experience does she have that you can point to?

She made a good speech and has several times. Biden makes crappy speeches but he has been a great president.

Democrats are obsessed with electing presidents based on who they are married to- if a woman is married to a former president, she instantly becomes qualified to be president. It’s so odd. Strong independent intelligent women who are the most qualified to run the world only because they sleep with a man who got elected lol sure.

There are Trump supporters who want Alina Hanna in some position of authority. For the stated reason of her looks.

Democrats ran Hillary “my turn” Clinton, and have asked Michelle Obama to run for president so many times (and she’s said no every time) that it’s giving desperate stalker.

Democrats want to get around the rule of a person only allowed to be elected president twice by electing the wives.

Democrats believe in anointed heirs-line of succession via monarchy. RFK, Beau Biden, Michelle Obama, Hillary.

These were their prospects

[Anonymous]

Some even want Jimmy Carters grandson.

They don’t hide their non-democratic monarchy like ambitions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What practical executive or legislative experience does she have that you can point to?

She made a good speech and has several times. Biden makes crappy speeches but he has been a great president.

Right? She is not nearly as talented as her husband.

TBH, I think she has a rather inflated view of herself (and I say this as a female).