LOL, if you think asking for additional bonus followed by a departure won’t poison your reputation in biglaw, you shouldn’t be giving people advice. I’m a partner. Have been one at three large firms. You are dead wrong. |
|
Why are people mean?
The joke is on the firm, OP because they are losing you and your talents. Enjoy tour new job and pregnancy. Chin up, head high. I think how you plan to leave is classy. You can still do exit interview and just say exactly what you said. |
The firm had decided, before pregnancy, that OP's work was not valuable to them. That's why OP wasn't getting enough work, and that's why her bonus is low. Both parties are getting what they ultimately want here. Not sure the issue. |
That’s not likely true. And two current lawsuits say it isn’t. So please stop taking out your frustrations on this woman |
| Try being pregnant sometime and we can talk |
You’re an unethical partner. Time to reup on the annual course. Signed Equity Partner |
You’re clearly projecting. Who stomped on your sand castle ahem bonus/partnership offer? |
| Lesson #1 for you dinosaurs. Do not threaten a woman, especially a pregnant woman, with bogus ostracism if she were to challenge the bonus decision that puts her at odds with her peers. |
Yes. Quite so. This is a lesson that has been demonstrated. We are all now trembling in fear that a semi-employed pregnant associate who didn’t meet her minimum hours requirement (and whom we don’t know) may request reconsideration of her bonus. At a firm we don’t work for. What? Honestly the OP, while seemingly immature and in need of some advice (which she received), has responded more or less reasonably. Probing for alternatives, what if I did this, etc. This one and maybe another who parachuted in to make this a women’s and/or trans rights issue? Bonkers. |
|
I find it perversely humorous how many people are absolutely convinced this is a case of sexism based on available facts. The only fact that supports this notion is the poster is a woman and pregnant. There are ample facts, provided by the poster, that indicate it’s because she’s an underperformer who was looking for another job.
Yet, people are CONVINCED it’s sexism. Conformation bias is a powerful force. |
|
OP here following up after giving notice: the partners reacted with shock and asked if I could push back the start date of my new job. One partner even told me I had to put my ethical duties to clients above my personal career plans.
I provided the notice period suggested in the firm handbook. Even if shameless flattering myself, I’m not irreplaceable on any of my matters. Can any partners here comment on this weird reception to my departure? This is a v50 firm. Is it normal to be guilted about leaving for greener pastures after being stiffed on a bonus??? This was not my expectation after seeing many people come and go over the years. |
There is no link. |
Perfect opportunity to push for a cash incentive to give them more time. They want your labor they can pay for it...or not. Also, partners have an ethical responsibility to have contingency plans in place so that's on them. |
| The small bonus was a message to you that you weren’t going to make the cut and it’s best to move on. Well, you got their message and are moving on. The jokes not on them as they are getting rid of a low performing employee without having to pay any severance. Don’t burn any bridges. |
Personal service firms will always push back on the date because they need to transition the work and that is always a pain. But, if you are staying for the handbook period you are fine. And the partner who said put ethical duties before personal career goals is a sanctimonious idiot. |